Are Tax Write-Offs Only For Businesses? – Avoid This Mistake + FAQs
- April 5, 2025
- 7 min read
No, tax write-offs aren’t exclusive to businesses – individual taxpayers can also claim deductions (“write-offs”) and credits to reduce their taxable income and save money on taxes.
According to a 2023 GOBankingRates survey, 90% of Americans don’t know the standard tax deduction amount, risking costly mistakes and missed savings on their tax returns.
🧐 Why tax write-offs aren’t just for corporations – discover how everyday taxpayers (not just companies) can benefit from tax deductions.
⚖️ Pros & cons of write-offs – understand how tax write-offs can save you money and where they might trigger IRS scrutiny if misused.
🚫 Costly tax deduction mistakes – learn the common pitfalls to avoid so you don’t miss out on savings or risk an audit.
💼 Real-life write-off examples – from freelancers to homeowners, see exactly how write-offs work in practice with detailed scenarios.
🌎 State-by-state write-off guide – find out how write-off rules differ in all 50 states, plus the key federal rules everyone should know.
Tax Write-Offs Explained: Not Just for Businesses (Immediate Answer)
Tax write-offs are not only for businesses.
A tax “write-off” is simply a deduction or expense that you are allowed to subtract from your taxable income. While the term often brings to mind business expenses, individuals can also take advantage of tax write-offs in many forms.
For example, when you claim the standard deduction on your personal tax return or deduct the interest on your mortgage, you’re using a tax write-off. In essence, any taxpayer – whether a sole proprietor, a big company, or an individual employee – can potentially claim some type of write-off if they meet the requirements.
Context: The confusion arises because businesses have a lot of obvious write-offs (like office supplies or equipment), and people often hear about companies “writing off” expenses.
But tax law provides plenty of deductions for individual taxpayers as well. These include personal itemized deductions (for things like charitable donations, medical expenses, or state taxes paid) and above-the-line adjustments (such as IRA contributions or student loan interest). Additionally, there are tax credits (distinct from deductions) for individuals, which are even more powerful than write-offs because they directly cut your tax bill.
Bottom line: Both businesses and individual filers can lower their tax bills through legitimate write-offs.
The key is understanding which expenses qualify, who can claim them, and how to do so properly. Next, we’ll dive deeper into the benefits and drawbacks of using these write-offs and clear up common misconceptions.
The Upsides and Downsides of Write-Offs (Pros & Cons)
Even though tax write-offs can save you money, it’s important to weigh the advantages and disadvantages. Not every deduction is a slam dunk – some come with trade-offs or limitations. Here’s a quick look at the pros and cons of using tax write-offs:
Pros of Tax Write-Offs | Cons of Tax Write-Offs |
---|---|
Lower taxable income: Write-offs reduce the income that’s subject to tax, so you pay less in taxes overall. For businesses, this can mean keeping more profit; for individuals, it can mean a higher refund or a smaller tax bill. | Strict rules and limits: Many deductions have complex rules or caps. For example, charitable contributions and medical expenses are deductible only up to certain limits, and the state and local tax deduction is capped (currently $10,000 on federal returns). You must follow IRS guidelines carefully. |
Encourages beneficial spending: Tax deductions often reward behaviors like buying a home, donating to charity, or saving for retirement. You get a financial break for doing things lawmakers consider socially or economically good. | Not a dollar-for-dollar benefit: A write-off is not free money – it only saves you the tax on the amount deducted. For instance, if you’re in the 22% tax bracket, a $1,000 deduction saves you $220 in tax, not the full $1,000. You still spent $780 out of pocket in that example. |
Available to individuals and businesses: Both personal and business expenses can qualify as write-offs if they meet the criteria. You don’t need a corporation to deduct eligible expenses (more on this later). Even a freelancer or a W-2 employee (through personal deductions) can utilize tax write-offs. | Record-keeping and paperwork: To claim deductions, you need documentation. That means saving receipts, bills, or mileage logs. More write-offs can make your tax return more complicated. If you itemize deductions, you’ll also need to file additional forms (like Schedule A for individuals or Schedule C for business income). |
Can lower tax brackets or unlock credits: Significant write-offs might drop you into a lower tax bracket or help you qualify for other tax benefits. For example, reducing your income via deductions could make you eligible for a tax credit or avoid phase-outs of certain credits. | Audit risks if misused: Overdoing or improperly claiming write-offs can raise red flags. For example, a small business owner writing off an excessive percentage of income as “business expenses” without proof could invite IRS scrutiny. It’s important to only claim legitimate expenses. |
As you can see, tax write-offs provide valuable savings, but they come with responsibilities. Keeping good records and understanding the rules is crucial. Next, we’ll look at mistakes to avoid so you stay on the right side of those rules.
Common Mistakes to Avoid With Tax Write-Offs
When it comes to claiming deductions, even well-intentioned taxpayers can slip up. Here are some common mistakes and misconceptions about tax write-offs that you’ll want to avoid:
Mixing Personal and Business Expenses: One big mistake is thinking you can write off personal expenses as business costs. For example, saying your vacation was a “business trip” without any work purpose, or trying to deduct everyday clothes as a “uniform.”
The IRS has clear rules – business write-offs must be ordinary and necessary for your trade or business. If you’re self-employed, keep a separate record (and bank account if possible) for business expenses to avoid blurring lines. Personal expenses (like your groceries or personal Netflix subscription) are never deductible as business costs.
Assuming “It’s a Write-Off” Means Free: There’s a popular myth (often joked about in TV shows) that if something is a write-off, it doesn’t cost you anything. This is false. As noted earlier, a write-off only saves you a fraction of the expense equal to your tax rate.
Spending money just to get a tax deduction is usually not wise. For instance, don’t go buying a luxury car at year-end purely “for the write-off” unless it truly serves a business need. You’ll still be out of pocket for most of the cost. In short, don’t spend $1 just to save 20¢ in tax.
Not Keeping Receipts or Proof: A deduction is not automatic – you need to substantiate it. A common mistake is forgetting to save documentation. If you claim a charitable donation, keep the letters/receipts from the charity. If you deduct mileage for work (as a self-employed person or for medical/charity purposes), maintain a mileage log. For business meals or travel, keep receipts and note the business purpose. In an audit, the IRS can deny write-offs that you can’t support with records. Good record-keeping throughout the year makes tax time much easier and defends your write-offs.
Overlooking Above-the-Line Deductions: Many individuals focus on itemized deductions and miss above-the-line deductions (adjustments to income) that anyone can take without itemizing. Common examples include contributions to a traditional IRA, HSA (health savings account), or the student loan interest deduction. A mistake is leaving these on the table. Always review the list of adjustments on Form 1040 Schedule 1 – you might qualify for some “write-offs” that reduce your Adjusted Gross Income directly. These can be valuable because they’re available whether or not you take the standard deduction.
Misclassifying Workers or Activities: Small business owners sometimes misstep by how they classify their work or workers, which affects deductions. For example, treating an employee as an independent contractor (or vice versa) can lead to deduction issues and penalties. Also, be careful with hobby activities. If you make a bit of income from a hobby (say you breed dogs or sell handmade crafts occasionally), you might assume you can write off all related costs.
However, if the activity isn’t a legitimate business with a profit motive, hobby loss rules will limit deductions to the amount of hobby income – you can’t deduct losses to offset other income. Essentially, don’t call something a business just for the deductions; the IRS can reclassify it as a hobby if it doesn’t meet the criteria (such as showing profit in at least 3 out of 5 years, for most activities).
By sidestepping these common errors, you’ll ensure your tax write-offs are both legal and optimized. Now, let’s reinforce your understanding with some concrete examples of how write-offs work for different taxpayers.
Detailed Examples of Tax Write-Offs in Action
Nothing makes taxes clearer than seeing real-world examples. Below are a few detailed scenarios illustrating how tax write-offs play out for both individuals and small business owners. These examples will show you who can claim what, and how much of a difference a write-off can make on the tax bill.
Example 1: Homeowner vs. Renter – Personal Deduction Scenario
Meet Jane and John. Jane is a homeowner who pays a lot of mortgage interest and property taxes. John is a renter with no major deductible expenses. Both have the same income.
Jane (Homeowner): Jane paid $8,000 in mortgage interest and $5,000 in property taxes in the year, and she also gave $2,000 to charity. These expenses are all potential itemized deductions. In total, Jane has $15,000 in itemized deductions. The standard deduction for her filing status (let’s say she’s single) is around $13,850 (for 2023). Since Jane’s itemized write-offs exceed the standard amount, she elects to itemize her deductions. By doing so, she reduces her taxable income by $15,000 instead of $13,850. If she’s in the 22% tax bracket, that extra write-off saves her roughly $253 more in tax than if she had taken the standard deduction. More importantly, Jane feels satisfied that she got to deduct expenses like property taxes and charity that she’s proud of – it slightly softens the sting of those big mortgage payments knowing some of it comes off her taxes.
John (Renter): John doesn’t have enough deductions to itemize – no mortgage interest, no property tax, and he only donated a small amount to charity. He takes the standard deduction of $13,850 available to all single filers. John still benefits from a tax write-off (the standard deduction is essentially a big write-off everyone gets), but beyond that he can’t deduct his rent or utilities, because those are personal expenses in the eyes of the tax code. John’s taxable income is reduced by $13,850 thanks to the standard deduction. He might playfully envy Jane’s additional deductions, but he’s also got a simpler tax return and he isn’t paying mortgage interest in the first place. In the end, both Jane and John utilized write-offs appropriate to their situation – Jane through itemizing, John through the standard deduction.
Example 2: Freelancer vs. Employee – Work Expense Write-Offs
Consider Alex and Sam. Both work in graphic design. Alex is a self-employed freelancer, while Sam is a W-2 employee at a design firm. This year, each spent $2,000 on a new computer and $500 on design software for their work.
Alex (Self-Employed): As a freelancer running his own business, Alex can write off the $2,500 he spent on equipment and software as business expenses on his Schedule C (Profit or Loss from Business). These are ordinary and necessary expenses for his trade. When Alex files his taxes, his business income will be reduced by that $2,500 in costs. If Alex made $50,000 in gross freelance income, after deducting the $2,500, he’ll only pay taxes on $47,500 of profit. Assuming a combined federal/self-employment tax rate around 30% for him, that write-off saves Alex roughly $750 in taxes. In effect, the government “subsidized” a portion of his new computer through this write-off, making the effective cost lower.
Sam (Employee): Sam uses the new computer for work as well, but because she’s an employee, she cannot deduct that cost on her federal return. Prior to 2018, employees could deduct unreimbursed job expenses (subject to certain limits) as an itemized deduction, but the tax law changed under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Now, unreimbursed employee expenses aren’t deductible on federal taxes (at least until 2026 when that provision sunsets, unless changed). Sam asked her employer if they could reimburse her or provide equipment – if the company had a program to cover it, that would be ideal (employers can deduct it on their side). But on her own return, Sam gets no write-off for the $2,500 out-of-pocket expense. She will simply take her standard deduction (or itemize if she has other big deductions like mortgage interest) and pay tax on all her wage income as usual. This example highlights a key disparity: self-employed individuals can write off business costs, whereas employees generally cannot deduct job-related expenses. Sam’s only consolation might be any state tax break (in a few states, unreimbursed employee expenses are still deductible – we’ll cover state nuances soon).
Example 3: Small Business Loss vs. Hobby Loss
Imagine Tony and Nina. Both love woodworking and sell handmade furniture. Tony runs it as a serious business, while Nina does it as a casual hobby on weekends. Each had $10,000 in sales this year. Each also spent about $12,000 on materials, tools, and a rented workshop space – meaning each had a net loss of $2,000 from their woodworking activities.
Tony (Business): Tony set up his woodworking as a business with the intention to profit. He operates under a business name, keeps accounting records, and actively markets his furniture. Even though he had a loss this year, Tony can deduct that $2,000 loss against his other income (say he or his spouse has a day job). On Tony’s tax return, he’ll file a Schedule C, showing $10,000 income and $12,000 expenses, for a $2,000 loss. This loss can then offset other taxable income he has, reducing his overall tax bill. The IRS will expect Tony to try to make a profit in future years, but having an occasional loss is normal for small businesses. Thanks to the write-offs, Tony doesn’t owe tax on his $10,000 of sales and he effectively gets to reduce, for example, his spouse’s W-2 income by $2,000 on the return, saving perhaps $2,000 * 22% = $440 in federal tax.
Nina (Hobby): Nina sells a few pieces to friends and at local fairs, but it’s more for fun. She isn’t actively trying to turn a consistent profit – it’s something she does out of passion in her spare time. For tax purposes, Nina’s activity is considered a hobby. She must report the $10,000 of income (all income is taxable unless specifically exempt), but hobby expenses are only deductible up to the hobby income and only if she itemizes (also subject to the prior 2%-of-AGI rule which is currently suspended). Practically, after 2018, hobby expenses are not deductible at all on federal returns. This means Nina has to report the $10,000 as other income and cannot deduct the $12,000 of costs at the federal level. She ends up paying tax on her hobby income even though she lost money overall – a frustrating result, but it’s the law. If Nina wants to deduct those costs in the future, she’d likely need to treat her venture more like a business (with profit motive). This scenario underscores why being classified as a business (with intent to make profit) is important for deducting losses. The IRS will look at factors like the frequency of profit, level of effort, and professionalism in operations to distinguish a business from a hobby.
These examples show how tax write-offs operate in concrete terms. The tax outcome can differ drastically based on your situation (business vs. employee, itemizing vs. standard, profit motive vs. hobby). Now, let’s apply these concepts to a few more real-world scenarios in a quick-reference format.
Real-World Application Scenarios
To further illustrate how tax write-offs work for different taxpayers, here are three common scenarios. Each scenario compares two situations side by side, highlighting who can take the write-off and who cannot (or how the rules differ). These will help you identify where you might fit and what you should be aware of:
Scenario 1: Remote Employee vs. Self-Employed Home Office
Many people work from home. Let’s compare a full-time remote employee with a self-employed person working from home, and how each handles home office expenses:
Remote W-2 Employee (Telecommuter) | Self-Employed Person (Home Office) |
---|---|
Situation: Works from home for a company due to office closures or remote hiring. Sets up a home office space and incurs expenses (desk, chair, extra utility costs). | Situation: Runs a small business (or freelancing) from a dedicated home office space. Incurs similar expenses for furniture, equipment, and a portion of household bills. |
Tax Write-Off: Cannot deduct home office expenses on federal taxes. The tax reform of 2018 suspended the itemized deduction for unreimbursed employee business expenses (which included home office for employees). Even if it’s required for the job, a W-2 employee gets no home office write-off. (One workaround: ask the employer for a telework stipend or reimbursement, which wouldn’t be taxable to the employee if done under an accountable plan.) | Tax Write-Off: Can deduct home office expenses on Schedule C (or Form 8829). The home office must be used regularly and exclusively for business. If eligible, the person can deduct a portion of rent or mortgage interest, utilities, homeowners insurance, and depreciation or rent of the home, proportional to the office’s square footage. There’s even a simplified home office deduction ($5 per square foot up to 300 sq ft). This write-off directly reduces self-employment income. |
Scenario 2: Personal Car Use vs. Business Vehicle Use
Cars can be a significant expense. Here’s how the tax treatment differs if a car is used personally versus for business:
Commuting in Personal Car | Using a Car for Business |
---|---|
Situation: You drive to and from your workplace (commuting) or use your car for personal errands. You’re an employee, not self-employed. | Situation: You use a vehicle as part of your trade or business – for example, a realtor driving to show houses, or a contractor hauling tools to job sites, or a rideshare driver. |
Tax Write-Off: No deduction for daily commuting or personal auto use. The cost of getting to your W-2 job is considered personal and not deductible. This includes gas, parking, and wear-and-tear commuting to work. (Exception: if you had to pay for parking or transit for work, those aren’t deductible federally either since 2018 for employees, though some employers offer pre-tax commuter benefits). Basically, the IRS treats commuting like personal living expenses. | Tax Write-Off: If you’re self-employed or using your car for business purposes, you can deduct vehicle expenses. Typically, you can choose between the standard mileage rate (e.g. ~$0.655 per mile in 2023) or actual expenses (a proportion of your gas, repairs, insurance, depreciation, etc. for the business use of the car). For example, if you drove 10,000 miles for business in a year, the standard mileage deduction would be about $6,550 off your taxable business income. Keep a log of business miles! Note: commuting miles (from home to your regular business location) aren’t considered business miles for anyone – but traveling between job sites during the day, or to meet clients, etc., counts if you’re a business owner or contractor. |
Scenario 3: Standard Deduction vs. Itemizing (Married Couple)
Choosing between the standard deduction and itemizing is a common situation each year. Let’s see how a married couple might decide:
Couple A – Takes Standard Deduction | Couple B – Itemizes Deductions |
---|---|
Situation: Married filing jointly with moderate income and typical expenses. They have a mortgage but it’s small, and their charity and other deductions don’t add up to more than the standard deduction. | Situation: Married filing jointly with significant deductible expenses – a large mortgage interest, high property and state taxes, and major charitable donations. |
Tax Write-Off: They claim the standard deduction for married filing jointly (for example, $27,700 for 2023). This is a fixed write-off that requires no tracking of actual expenses. It covers any combination of personal expenses implicitly. They don’t need to itemize records of every deduction category. If their potential itemized expenses total less than $27,700, the standard deduction gives them a bigger write-off and keeps things simple. Benefit: Simplicity and often a larger deduction than itemizing would yield for them. | Tax Write-Off: They choose to itemize deductions because the sum exceeds the standard amount. For example, suppose they paid $20,000 in mortgage interest (big loan), $10,000 in state/local taxes, and $5,000 to charity – totaling $35,000. By itemizing, they deduct $35,000 instead of $27,700. This $7,300 extra deduction might save them around $1,600 in tax (if in the 22% bracket). They will file Schedule A detailing these expenses. Trade-off: More paperwork and the need to keep proof (mortgage statements, receipts), but it pays off with a lower tax bill due to their high expenses. |
These scenarios highlight how the applicability of tax write-offs can change based on employment status, purpose of expenses, and personal financial situations. Now that we’ve covered scenarios, let’s compare some key tax concepts directly to solidify your understanding.
Key Comparisons and Distinctions in Tax Write-Offs
In the world of taxes, not all tax reductions are created equal. It’s important to distinguish between similar-sounding terms and different types of tax breaks. Here are some key comparisons that often cause confusion:
Tax Write-Off (Deduction) vs. Tax Credit
A tax write-off (deduction) reduces your taxable income. In contrast, a tax credit reduces your tax liability (the tax you owe) dollar-for-dollar. For example, a $1,000 deduction saves you maybe $220 if you’re in the 22% bracket, but a $1,000 credit saves you the full $1,000 in tax, regardless of your bracket. Credits are generally more powerful. Typical deductions (write-offs) include things like the standard deduction, charitable contributions, or business expenses. Typical credits include the Child Tax Credit or the American Opportunity Credit for education. Both are valuable, and individuals can often claim a combination of deductions and credits. Remember: Deduction = income reduced; Credit = tax bill reduced. (In everyday speech, people sometimes say “write-off” broadly to mean any tax break, but technically a write-off usually refers to a deduction.)
Business Expenses vs. Personal Itemized Deductions
Business expenses are write-offs you claim on a business schedule (Schedule C for sole proprietors, or corporate tax returns, etc.). They must be directly related to earning business income. These include costs like inventory, advertising, business travel, and salaries you pay employees. Personal itemized deductions are claimed on Schedule A (on your Form 1040) and aren’t tied to a business activity; they’re personal expenses that the tax code allows you to deduct to calculate your taxable income. Examples of itemized deductions are medical expenses (over a certain threshold), mortgage interest, property taxes, state income taxes, charitable donations, etc. The key difference: Business expenses offset business income (and you can deduct them even if you don’t itemize personal deductions), whereas personal itemized deductions require forgoing the standard deduction and only benefit you if their total exceeds that standard amount. Also, personal deductions often have more limits (for instance, you can’t deduct personal commuting, but a business can deduct vehicle use for work as we saw).
Standard Deduction vs. Itemizing
The standard deduction is a flat amount that anyone can deduct from income, based on filing status. It’s basically a no-questions-asked write-off that the IRS gives you to cover normal living expenses. Itemizing means listing specific deductible expenses on Schedule A. You would itemize if your allowed expenses (like medical, taxes, interest, charity, etc.) add up to more than the standard deduction. About 90% of taxpayers now take the standard deduction since it was increased in recent tax reforms, but if you have large deductible expenses (like a big mortgage or very high medical bills in a year), you might be among the minority who itemize. Key comparison: Standard deduction is simpler and guaranteed, while itemizing can yield a bigger tax break but requires having significant qualifying expenses and doing more paperwork. You have to choose one or the other in a given tax year – you cannot take both. Also, note that the standard deduction amount is indexed to inflation and varies by filing status (and age/blindness), whereas itemized deductions have individual category limits but no overall flat amount cap (though in the past, high incomes had “Pease” phase-outs that trimmed itemized totals).
Bonus: Taxable Income vs. Adjusted Gross Income (AGI)
This isn’t a direct “vs” in terms of write-offs, but it’s worth comparing these terms as they relate to deductions. Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) is your income after “above-the-line” deductions (adjustments) but before the standard or itemized deduction. Taxable income is what’s left after all deductions (and after subtracting the standard or itemized deduction and any qualified business income deduction, etc.). Many tax benefits’ eligibility is based on your AGI or a modified AGI – for instance, the ability to contribute to a Roth IRA or deduct traditional IRA contributions depends on AGI. When you claim write-offs, some reduce your AGI (e.g., a self-employed health insurance deduction or IRA contribution reduces AGI), which can have a domino effect of making you eligible for other things. Other write-offs (like itemized deductions) don’t affect AGI but still reduce taxable income. So, the distinction: AGI is an intermediate figure that is important for phase-outs; taxable income is the final number on which your tax is calculated. Deductions can come into play at different stages of getting from total income down to taxable income.
By understanding these comparisons, you can better navigate tax discussions and know exactly what someone means by a “write-off” versus a credit, or a business expense versus a personal deduction. Next, we’ll clearly define some key terms that have come up, to ensure you’re fluent in the tax lingo.
Defining Key Tax Terms
To make sense of tax write-offs, it helps to grasp the terminology. Here are clear definitions of some key terms we’ve been discussing:
Tax Write-Off (Tax Deduction): A write-off is an informal term for any expense or amount that you can subtract from your income to reduce the amount of tax you owe. In tax language, this is a deduction. For individuals, common write-offs include things like the standard deduction, charitable contributions, or medical expenses. For businesses, it includes business-related expenses. A write-off does not directly reduce your tax dollar-for-dollar, but it lowers your taxable income, which then lowers your tax.
Standard Deduction: A fixed dollar amount that most taxpayers can subtract from their income without having to list out expenses. The amount depends on your filing status (and adjusts each year for inflation). For example, for 2023, the standard deduction is $13,850 for single filers and $27,700 for married joint filers (with slightly higher amounts if you are 65+ or blind). You can’t take any itemized deductions if you take this – it’s one or the other. It’s essentially the government’s way of giving everyone a basic tax break to cover non-specific necessities.
Itemized Deductions: Specific eligible expenses that you can deduct in lieu of the standard deduction. You list these on Schedule A of your tax return. Itemized deductions include categories such as home mortgage interest, state and local taxes (SALT) up to $10k, charitable contributions, medical and dental expenses (the portion that exceeds 7.5% of your AGI), and a few others. If the total of these expenses is more than your standard deduction, you would itemize to get a bigger write-off. Itemizing requires saving receipts and documentation for those expenses. It makes sense for taxpayers who have significant deductible expenses (like homeowners in high-tax states, for instance).
Above-the-Line Deduction: Also known as an adjustment to income, this is a deduction that you can take before determining your Adjusted Gross Income (AGI). It doesn’t require itemizing. Examples include contributions to a traditional IRA, HSA contributions, the student loan interest deduction, educator expenses (for teachers), and self-employed health insurance or retirement plan contributions. These are valuable because they reduce your AGI, which can affect many other parts of your tax return (credits, phase-outs, etc.). The term “above-the-line” comes from the fact that on the tax form, these deductions come before the line where AGI is calculated.
Adjusted Gross Income (AGI): Your total income (wages, interest, business income, etc.) minus above-the-line deductions. AGI is a key figure on your tax return because many credits and further deductions are limited or phased out based on AGI. For instance, medical expenses are deductible only to the extent they exceed 7.5% of AGI – so the lower your AGI, the easier to deduct medical costs. Many credits (like the Child Tax Credit or education credits) have income phase-out ranges based on AGI. In short, AGI is your income after certain adjustments, and it sets the stage for what deductions or credits you can take next.
Taxable Income: The amount of income that is actually subject to tax after all deductions and exemptions. You arrive at taxable income by taking your AGI, then subtracting either the standard deduction or total itemized deductions (plus any Qualified Business Income deduction or personal exemptions, as applicable – note that personal exemptions are currently $0 through 2025 due to tax law changes). Your tax brackets and tax calculation are applied to this taxable income number. All write-offs ultimately aim to lower this taxable income.
Ordinary and Necessary (Business Expense): This phrase comes from tax law (Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code) and defines what business expenses are deductible. An ordinary expense is common and accepted in your type of business, and a necessary expense is helpful and appropriate for your business. For example, for a freelance photographer, buying a camera is ordinary and necessary; for a bakery, buying flour and sugar is ordinary and necessary. These expenses can be written off against business income. Expenses that are lavish or predominantly personal wouldn’t qualify. “Necessary” doesn’t mean absolutely indispensable, just appropriate and helpful in running the business.
Schedule A, Schedule C, etc.: These are tax forms (schedules) attached to your Form 1040 to report certain types of deductions or income. Schedule A is where you detail itemized deductions (medical, taxes, interest, charity, etc.) for individuals. Schedule C is where a sole proprietor (self-employed person) reports business income and expenses (business write-offs). Understanding these forms is useful because it tells you where the write-off is taken. For instance, a home office deduction for a self-employed person actually gets reported on Schedule C or a Form 8829 (which flows to Schedule C), not on Schedule A.
Internal Revenue Service (IRS): The IRS is the U.S. government agency responsible for administering federal tax laws, processing tax returns, and enforcing rules – including what qualifies as a deduction. When we talk about “IRS rules” for write-offs, it includes the laws passed by Congress (Internal Revenue Code) and the IRS regulations and guidance on how to apply those laws. If you claim a questionable write-off, the IRS is the body that may challenge it, ask for proof, or audit your return. They also publish guidelines every year (like what the standard mileage rate is, or inflation-adjusted deduction limits).
Understanding these terms gives you the language to navigate tax discussions and IRS instructions. Now, let’s explore the players and entities involved in the realm of tax write-offs and how they relate to one another.
Related Entities and Organizations in the Tax Write-Off World
Tax write-offs involve a web of entities, people, and organizations – from lawmakers to tax authorities to the taxpayers themselves. Here we identify some of the key players and their relationships in the context of U.S. tax deductions:
Congress and the Tax Code: The U.S. Congress (House and Senate) passes tax laws that define what is deductible and what isn’t. For example, Congress sets provisions like “mortgage interest is deductible” or “the standard deduction is $X”. These laws are codified in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). So when we talk about allowable write-offs, ultimately Congress has legislated those rules. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (a law passed by Congress) is what significantly changed the standard deduction and many itemized deductions. Thus, Congress is the source of tax policy, creating or removing write-offs through legislation.
Internal Revenue Service (IRS): The IRS is the administrative agency that implements and enforces the tax laws from Congress. The IRS issues regulations and guidance to interpret the tax code, processes tax returns, and can audit taxpayers. For example, Congress might allow a home office deduction, and the IRS then provides a form and guidelines on how to calculate it. The relationship: IRS acts under the laws Congress makes. If there’s ambiguity in what counts as an “ordinary” business expense, the IRS might clarify through rulings or publications. In a sense, the IRS is the referee that makes sure taxpayers are playing by the rules when claiming write-offs.
Taxpayers (Individuals and Businesses): These are you and me – anyone who files a tax return. Individual taxpayers claim personal deductions on their 1040. Business entities (like corporations, partnerships, self-employed individuals) claim business expenses on their returns. Taxpayers are the ones who benefit from write-offs (by paying less tax) but also must comply with requirements. There’s a dynamic relationship of give-and-take: taxpayers try to maximize their legitimate deductions, and the IRS monitors compliance. Within this, you also have tax professionals (CPAs, tax attorneys, enrolled agents) who advise taxpayers and often act as intermediaries in dealing with the IRS.
State Tax Agencies: Each U.S. state that has an income tax has its own tax agency (for example, California Franchise Tax Board (FTB), New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, Illinois Department of Revenue, etc.). These agencies administer state tax laws, which sometimes mirror federal rules and sometimes diverge. When it comes to write-offs, state rules can differ from federal (as we’ll detail in the next section). These agencies have relationships with taxpayers similar to the IRS’s role, but for state-specific taxes. States might allow or disallow certain deductions on the state return. They also sometimes piggyback on IRS auditing – e.g., if the IRS adjusts your federal return for a denied deduction, the state may follow suit on your state return.
Tax Courts and Judiciary: If there’s a dispute about a write-off – say the IRS denies a deduction and the taxpayer believes it was legitimate – it can end up in Tax Court (or even higher courts). The United States Tax Court is a federal court where taxpayers can litigate with the IRS over tax issues before paying the disputed amount. There are also federal district courts and appeals courts that handle tax cases (and the Supreme Court for major issues). These courts make decisions that interpret tax laws and set precedents. For instance, various court cases have established guidelines on what counts as a deductible expense (you’ll see some examples in the next section). The relationship: courts provide a check on IRS interpretations and clarify grey areas of the law, which in turn influences how future taxpayers’ write-offs are treated.
Tax Preparation and Software Companies: Organizations like TurboTax (Intuit), H&R Block, and others aren’t government entities, but they play a big role for many taxpayers. They incorporate the tax rules into their software or services. They educate users on what deductions they might qualify for (often asking interview questions like “Did you have any of these expenses…?”). While not authoritative like the IRS, they often work closely with IRS forms and regs. Their relationship: they serve as facilitators, helping taxpayers identify and claim write-offs properly. In doing so, they also interact with the IRS systems (e-filing returns, etc.).
Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) and Tax Advisors: These professionals are individuals or firms that help taxpayers comply with tax laws and plan affairs in a tax-efficient way. They stay up-to-date with current deduction rules and strategies. A tax advisor might suggest to a small business owner how to maximize deductions or warn an individual if a write-off is not allowed. They often represent taxpayers in dealings with the IRS as well. Their role underscores that the tax ecosystem isn’t just between the government and a lone taxpayer – many people rely on experts to navigate their deductions and credits.
Nonprofit Organizations (e.g., Charities): Oddly enough, certain organizations factor into the deduction world – for example, 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. When you donate to a qualified charity, you as the donor potentially get a tax write-off (if you itemize). So there’s a relationship: charities provide documentation of donations, and taxpayers claim those as deductions. The tax incentive exists to encourage support of these nonprofits. Charitable organizations are “related” in the sense that their status (being recognized by the IRS as tax-exempt and eligible to receive deductible contributions) directly affects donors’ write-off ability.
Small Business Administration (SBA) & Other Agencies: Indirectly, agencies like the SBA (Small Business Administration) or the Department of Commerce can influence the landscape by providing guidance or education to businesses about taxes. For example, SBA often has resources about small business tax deductions, and as seen in recent initiatives, they might coordinate with the IRS to improve small business tax literacy. They’re not involved in enforcement, but they are part of the network that helps businesses understand what they can deduct.
All these entities interact in the sphere of tax write-offs. For instance, Congress might change a law (like raising the standard deduction), the IRS then updates forms and guidance, tax software incorporates the changes, tax professionals advise clients accordingly, taxpayers claim the new deduction, and state agencies decide whether to conform to that change for state taxes. It’s a complex ecosystem, but each piece has its role in shaping how write-offs are ultimately used.
Now that we’ve covered the groundwork at both federal and individual levels, let’s dive into how write-offs work at the state level, and outline the nuances for all 50 states in one handy guide.
Federal vs. State: Tax Write-Off Rules Across the 50 States
When you pay taxes, you typically file a federal return and, if applicable, a state return. Federal tax rules for deductions apply to your federal return, but states can set their own rules for state income tax. Some states follow the federal system closely, while others have quirky differences. First, let’s summarize the federal rules in place:
Federal Tax Write-Off Rules (Quick Recap)
Every filer can take either the federal standard deduction or itemize federal deductions. The standard deduction amounts are set by federal law (and are currently large due to recent tax law changes). Itemized deductions on the federal level have limits like the SALT (state and local tax) $10k cap and restrictions such as only medical expenses above 7.5% of AGI count.
Above-the-line deductions (like IRA contributions, student loan interest) are available to reduce federal AGI.
Many employee deductions (miscellaneous itemized) were suspended from 2018-2025, meaning things like unreimbursed job expenses, tax prep fees, etc., aren’t deductible on the federal return in that period.
Business expenses are fully deductible federally as long as they’re ordinary and necessary, subject to specific rules (e.g., 50% limit on meals, no deduction for entertainment expenses, etc.).
There are no more personal exemptions (through 2025) on the federal return, which simplified some parts of itemizing vs standard decision.
Federal law has special provisions like the alternative minimum tax (AMT) which can limit the benefit of certain deductions for higher-income taxpayers.
Now, when it comes to state income taxes, each state can decide how much of the federal system to adopt. Some states start their tax calculation with the federal Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) or federal taxable income, then make adjustments from there. Others have their own definitions of income and deductions. Below is a table of all 50 states and a brief note on how each one handles personal tax write-offs (like standard deductions, itemized deductions, and any unique state twists). This will give you a sense of state-level nuances:
State | State Tax Write-Off Rules (Personal Income Tax) |
---|---|
Alabama | Has its own standard deduction (ranging up to ~$4,000 single/$7,500 joint, depending on income) and also allows itemized deductions similar to federal. Uniquely, Alabama allows taxpayers to deduct their federal income tax paid on the state return – one of the few states to do so (which can significantly reduce state taxable income for those who pay high federal tax). Itemized deductions in AL follow many federal rules (including the SALT limit of $10k). |
Alaska | No state income tax. Alaska does not tax personal income, so there’s no need for state deductions or write-offs on an Alaska return (since there’s no return!). |
Arizona | Offers a state standard deduction (around $12,950 single/$25,900 joint for 2023, slightly lower than federal) or itemized deductions. Arizona largely mirrors federal itemized deductions but with an extra perk: if you take the standard deduction, you can still increase it by claiming an extra 25% of your charitable contributions (this encourages giving even for standard deduction filers). Arizona allows you to itemize on your state return even if you took the standard on the federal return. |
Arkansas | Has a state standard deduction (about $2,200 single/$4,400 joint) and allows itemized deductions similar to the old federal rules. Arkansas lets you choose to itemize or not regardless of your federal choice (they’re decoupled). Arkansans can deduct things like mortgage interest, property taxes, etc., on the state return if they itemize. |
California | Provides a standard deduction for state (approximately $5,202 single/$10,404 joint in 2023) or the option to itemize deductions. California’s itemized deductions start from federal itemized, but with some differences: CA does not allow a deduction for state income taxes (you can deduct real estate taxes and vehicle license fees, but not state income tax on the CA return), and it doesn’t conform to some federal changes (for example, CA still allows miscellaneous itemized deductions that were suspended federally, and CA did not conform to the federal mortgage interest limit drop to $750k for new loans – it’s still $1 million for CA). High-income Californians also face a reduction in itemized deductions (a revival of Pease limitation) since CA did not conform to its repeal. So, itemizing can be a little different in CA, but the big ones like mortgage interest and property taxes (up to certain limits) and charitable contributions are deductible. |
Colorado | Uses federal taxable income as the starting point for state taxes. Colorado does not have its own standard or itemized deduction – it simply takes whatever your taxable income was federally (which already accounts for your standard or itemized deduction choice) and then makes a few state-specific modifications. In practice, this means Colorado automatically respects your federal write-offs. There’s no need to recalculate deductions for CO. (Colorado does allow some subtractions like for pension income or 529 contributions, but those are separate from the standard/itemized concept.) |
Connecticut | Does not use the federal standard deduction; instead, Connecticut has its own system. CT provides a personal exemption that phases out at higher incomes and a credit that effectively acts like a deduction phaseout recapture for high earners. Connecticut does not allow federal itemized deductions. Instead, CT has certain targeted deductions/credits (like a property tax credit up to $300 for property taxes paid, and an exemption for Social Security income below certain AGI). So, there’s no itemizing of mortgage interest or charity on CT’s return – the state tax is calculated primarily from income with some specific subtractions/credits. |
Delaware | Allows a standard deduction (around $3,250 single/$6,500 joint) or itemized deductions on the state return. Delaware generally follows federal itemized deduction definitions and limits. However, if you itemize in Delaware, you must have itemized on the federal return as well. Conversely, if you took the standard federally, you’ll take Delaware’s standard. Delaware also allows additional deductions like for contributions to Delaware college savings plans, etc., but those are smaller adjustments. Overall, fairly aligned with federal rules. |
Florida | No state income tax. (Florida has none on individuals, so no deductions necessary at state level.) |
Georgia | Offers a standard deduction (about $5,400 single/$7,100 head of household/$7,400 joint for 2023) or allows itemized deductions. Georgia largely conforms to federal itemized deductions, including the SALT cap and other limits. One catch: If you claim the standard deduction on your federal return, Georgia requires you to take the standard on the state return as well. If you itemize federally, you can itemize in Georgia. In summary, GA’s deductions mirror federal, but with its own standard deduction amounts which are lower than the federal ones (so some Georgia taxpayers who take the federal standard might actually benefit from itemizing on the state if GA allowed it, but GA says you must follow the federal choice). |
Hawaii | Has a standard deduction (around $2,200 single/$4,400 joint) or itemized deductions. Hawaii’s itemized deductions generally follow federal definitions, but Hawaii imposes its own limits: for instance, it has a lower cap on state and local tax deduction ($5,000 cap for joint filers on state return, irrespective of federal $10k), and high-income residents ($200k+ single, $400k+ joint) can’t deduct state taxes at all on the HI return. Also, Hawaii did not conform to the TCJA’s suspension of miscellaneous deductions – but it did implement a limitation: itemized deductions (except charity, medical, etc.) are capped at a percentage of AGI for high earners. It’s a bit complex, but generally, Hawaii taxpayers benefit from similar write-offs, with some extra state-imposed caps for the wealthy. |
Idaho | Allows the federal standard deduction or itemized deductions on the state return. In fact, Idaho’s standard deduction is tied to the federal amount (so it’s the same $13,850 single, etc.). Idaho thus conforms closely: if you took standard on federal, you’ll take standard on Idaho (the same amount); if you itemized, you can itemize Idaho. Idaho does have a few unique adjustments (like a deduction for health insurance premiums if not taken federally, and Idaho education savings account contributions), but in terms of main deductions, it’s mostly federal conformity. |
Illinois | No broad itemized deductions on the state return. Illinois uses federal AGI as a starting point and then allows a personal exemption (around $2,425 per person in 2023) but does not allow you to deduct things like mortgage interest or charity on the IL return. However, Illinois does offer a couple of specific write-offs: notably, a property tax credit (which is 5% of the property taxes you paid on your primary residence, up to certain limits) and certain retirement contributions or withdrawals adjustments. Essentially, IL has a flat tax and keeps it simple – you don’t itemize deductions. Everyone’s getting taxed on their income after just the personal exemption (and maybe credits). |
Indiana | Doesn’t allow federal itemized deductions, but it provides some state-specific deductions. Indiana has a flat tax on AGI. You get a $1,000 personal exemption (per taxpayer and dependent) and a dependent child exemption additionally. There’s no standard deduction per se, but there are common deductions such as: up to $2,500 of property taxes paid on your home can be deducted, and up to $3,000 of rent paid can be deducted (one or the other, not both). Indiana also had a mortgage interest deduction similar to the property tax one, but it was repealed for 2023 onward (they folded some of that benefit into a lower tax rate). Other deductions include things like some college savings contributions. Bottom line: IN doesn’t let you itemize the way federal does; instead it offers targeted deductions (like the property tax and rent deduction) to everyone. |
Iowa | Offers both a state standard deduction (around $2,210 single/$5,450 joint for 2022; note Iowa is in the midst of tax reforms increasing these) or itemized deductions. Importantly, until 2022 Iowa allowed a full deduction of federal taxes paid (like Alabama). Starting in 2023, Iowa has reformed its tax code: it eliminated the federal tax deduction and moved to a flatter tax system. For deductions: Iowa now largely aligns with federal itemized deductions (with SALT cap etc.) if you itemize. If you claimed federal itemized, you likely itemize Iowa; if you took federal standard, Iowa requires standard. Iowa’s standard deduction amounts were smaller but are being phased out as they flatten the tax (by 2026 Iowa will have a flat rate and no federal deductibility; standard vs itemize may become moot if they switch fully to just taxable income starting point). For now, an Iowa taxpayer can still choose to itemize or not at the state level, but the options mirror federal categories. |
Kansas | Has a standard deduction ($3,500 single/$8,000 joint in 2023) or allows itemized deductions. Kansas used to require matching the federal choice, but a recent change now allows Kansans to itemize on their state return even if they took the standard federally. Kansas itemized deductions are limited though: currently, Kansas allows itemized deductions for charitable contributions, mortgage interest, and property taxes only, and they phase in the percentage allowed (in 2023, you could claim 100% of those three categories; previously it was partial). Other federal itemized categories (like medical or casualty losses) aren’t deductible on Kansas returns. So essentially, Kansas narrowed the scope to the big three itemized deductions. |
Kentucky | Offers a standard deduction (about $2,770 per filer in 2023) or the choice to itemize. However, Kentucky requires that if you itemize on the state, you must have itemized federally. Kentucky’s itemized deductions follow federal rules, with one notable difference: KY allows full deduction of medical expenses using the 7.5% AGI threshold even if federal moves that threshold (Kentucky often sticks with older rules until updated). Also, Kentucky does not allow state income tax to be deducted on the KY return (you can deduct local property taxes etc., but not Kentucky income tax). Kentucky also provides a credit for sales tax on large purchases in lieu of income tax deduction for those who don’t itemize, but that’s a bit niche. Overall, fairly close to federal itemizing. |
Louisiana | Has a standard deduction (built into personal exemptions – effectively $4,500 single/$9,000 joint as a combined exemption) or itemized deductions. Louisiana used to allow full deduction of federal income taxes (like AL) but eliminated that in 2022 as part of reforms. Now LA offers itemized deductions similar to federal – with one twist: Louisiana still allows deduction for federal income tax, but capped at $5,000 single/$10,000 joint (this replaced the unlimited one). Also, if you take the federal standard, you must take LA standard; if you itemize federal, you can choose LA itemized or standard. LA’s itemized categories mirror federal (including SALT cap etc.), but with the above cap on deducting federal tax. |
Maine | Provides a standard deduction and itemized deductions, both of which have unique calculations. Maine’s standard deduction is set at 15% of Maine adjusted gross income, with minimum and maximum limits (for 2023, min ~$2,300 single, max ~$9,200; double for joint). Maine also gives personal exemptions (which federal doesn’t currently). If a taxpayer itemizes federally, they can itemize in Maine, but Maine imposes its own limits: Maine conforms to the federal $10k SALT cap and $750k mortgage cap. However, Maine also has a general cap: total itemized deductions cannot exceed $80,000 (adjusted for inflation) for high-income taxpayers, except medical and charitable are excluded from that cap. Also, Maine allows a special deduction for student loan interest that exceeds the federal limit. It’s a bit complex, but for most, Maine follows federal itemized with a state-specific twist on the standard method and a cap for high earners. |
Maryland | Offers a standard deduction (ranging from $2,400–$2,550 single / $4,850–$5,100 joint as a range) or itemizing. Maryland’s rule: you must use the same method as your federal return. So if you took federal standard, you cannot itemize in MD; if you itemized federal, you must itemize MD (well, technically you could take MD standard but it’s usually smaller than fed, so you wouldn’t if you itemized fed). Maryland’s itemized deductions start with federal itemized allowed amount, with one big difference: MD lets you deduct state income tax on the MD return (yes, a bit circular). Actually, Maryland is one of the few that does: it allows deduction of MD income tax paid, but then immediately imposes an “Optional Local Tax Limitation” which effectively limits how much benefit you can get. Maryland also limits overall itemized deductions for high incomes by phasing them out (somewhat akin to the old Pease limitation). In short, MD encourages most folks to just follow whatever they did federally, with only small tweaks. |
Massachusetts | No standard deduction. Massachusetts does things differently: it provides personal exemptions (such as $4,400 for single, $8,800 joint in 2023) instead of a standard deduction. MA does not allow you to itemize deductions like federal; instead it permits a limited set of specific deductions. For instance, MA allows a deduction for rent paid (50% of rent up to $3,000), allows deduction for Massachusetts state income tax refunds (if taxed federally), and starting in 2023, allows charitable contributions as a deduction (with no limit, a new change). MA also allows deductions for things like college tuition (up to certain amount), and certain medical savings or commuter costs. But notably, Massachusetts does NOT allow deduction of mortgage interest or property taxes on the state return – those are not deductible in MA (except property tax maybe indirectly via the Circuit Breaker credit for seniors). So, Massive differences: It’s essentially a separate system. People in MA mostly just take their personal exemption and then any of those state-allowed deductions. |
Michigan | No standard or itemized deduction like federal. Michigan starts with federal AGI and then allows personal exemptions ($5,000 per exemption in 2023) to all. Michigan doesn’t let you deduct mortgage interest, charity, etc., on the state return. However, MI provides some targeted subtractions (for example, certain retirement income can be subtracted, and there’s a special additional exemption for seniors). Also, Michigan has a Homestead Property Tax Credit (income-based) rather than a deduction. Essentially, Michigan’s individual income tax is flat and does not utilize itemized deductions. It keeps it straightforward: no itemizing on MI return; just claim your personal exemptions and calculate tax. |
Minnesota | Offers both a standard deduction (same as federal amounts) or itemized deductions. Minnesota largely conformed to the federal system but with some differences after TCJA: It allows itemizing on the state even if you took standard federally (so you have flexibility). Minnesota’s itemized deductions follow federal definitions, including the $10k SALT cap and $750k mortgage cap, but Minnesota still allows certain deductions that federal cut (like unreimbursed employee expenses, through 2025 MN taxpayers can subtract some of those as an adjustment). Also, MN has its own addition: it has a refundable K-12 education expense credit/deduction. In general, though, Minnesota is closely aligned with federal write-off rules for itemizing and uses the same standard deduction values. One more nuance: MN has a somewhat unique alternative minimum taxable income addition called the add-back of state deductions for AMT, but that’s beyond our scope here. For most people: you likely do the same on MN as you do on federal, unless you have a reason to differ. |
Mississippi | Has a standard deduction ($2,300 single/$4,600 joint for 2023) or allows itemized deductions. Mississippi’s itemized deductions generally follow federal rules (including mortgage interest, taxes, charity, medical). MS does not impose the federal SALT cap of $10k on the state return – you can deduct state taxes fully on the MS return (since it’s a separate jurisdiction). However, Mississippi is one of a few states that allow deducting federal income tax paid, and Mississippi currently allows it for itemizers (it’s somewhat built into the tax table for standard deduction users). In short, MS is fairly traditional: if your itemized (including fed tax paid) exceed the standard, you itemize. If not, you take standard. They require you to use the same method as federal in most cases (especially if you’re married filing separately, there are conditions). Mississippians thus enjoy the older style itemization. |
Missouri | Offers a standard deduction (matching the federal amount by law) or itemized deductions. Missouri follows federal itemized deductions with a few exceptions: MO is one of the six states that allowed deduction of federal taxes – Missouri still does, but caps it at $5,000 single/$10,000 joint, and phases it out for higher incomes (if Missouri AGI > $125k single/$250k joint, the federal tax deduction is phased out). Also, if you claimed the standard on the federal return, Missouri does not allow you to itemize on state (you must also take standard for MO). If you itemized federal, you can choose MO itemized or standard (whichever is beneficial). Missouri’s itemized categories are similar to federal (with SALT cap, etc.). So, MO residents usually mirror their federal deductions, with the bonus of that federal tax deduction if applicable. |
Montana | Has a state standard deduction (20% of Montana AGI, capped at $5,140 single/$10,280 joint for 2023) or itemized deductions. Montana historically allowed deduction of federal taxes up to $5,000/$10,000, but as of 2024, Montana’s tax reform repealed the federal tax deduction to simplify the code. Now, Montanans who itemize can deduct basically the same things as federal (mortgage interest, charitable, medical, etc.), and Montana’s itemized deduction is actually claimed on the federal Schedule A form attached to state return (with a few adjustments like no state tax deduction on state return). If federal standard was taken, you can still choose to itemize for Montana if it benefits you. Montana also provides a personal exemption ($2,800 each in 2023). In summary, Montana gives flexibility in choosing standard vs itemize and aligns largely with federal definitions post-reform. |
Nebraska | Offers a standard deduction (which matches the federal amounts for each status) or itemized. Nebraska has mostly conformed to federal itemized rules (including the post-2018 changes). If you take the federal standard, you also take NE standard; if you itemize federal, you have the option in Nebraska to take whichever (but usually you’d also itemize NE if you did federally). NE doesn’t do anything exotic like federal tax deduction. It does allow some adjustments like a subtraction for Social Security income depending on AGI. Overall, straightforward: use federal approach. |
Nevada | No state income tax, so no deductions needed at the state level. |
New Hampshire | No broad wage income tax. (NH taxes only interest and dividends over certain amounts, at a flat rate that is being phased out by 2027). So for earned income, there’s no NH tax and thus no standard or itemized deductions. Even for the interest/dividend tax, there are no deductions except a flat exemption amount. Effectively, for normal purposes, NH has no personal income tax system to worry about. |
New Jersey | New Jersey does not allow federal itemized deductions or the federal standard deduction. Instead, NJ has its own set of exclusions and deductions. NJ provides a personal exemption ($1,000 per taxpayer/dependent, and an additional $1,500 for age 65+ or blind) and also allows a few specific deductions: e.g., medical expenses (exceeding 2% of NJ income), property taxes (up to $15,000 can be deducted, or you can take a refundable credit up to $50 instead), and contributions to NJ-based 529 college savings. There’s no deduction for mortgage interest or charitable contributions on the NJ return. New Jersey essentially has a simpler tax base for state tax – wages, interest, etc., minus those limited deductions. The state income tax form has separate lines for each allowed deduction category, but it’s nowhere near the comprehensive list of federal Schedule A. So if you’re used to itemizing federally, expect that NJ might tax more of your income because they don’t mirror those deductions (except property tax and medical to some extent). |
New Mexico | Uses options of standard deduction or itemized in line with federal. NM’s standard deduction equals the federal standard. NM allows itemized deductions and actually piggybacks on federal: New Mexico’s tax form starts with federal taxable income (like Colorado does). This means whatever you did federally (standard or itemized) is already baked into that number, and New Mexico mostly accepts it. NM does have a deduction for state income tax refunds and some other tweaks, but in general, if you itemized federally, that benefit carries into NM automatically; if you took standard, likewise. New Mexico also provides a personal exemption of $4,000 each (since federal personal exemptions are gone, NM lets you subtract an amount for each exemption). Summed up: NM aligns closely with federal definitions and simply adjusts from federal taxable income. |
New York | Offers a state standard deduction ($8,000 single, $16,050 joint for 2023) or itemized deductions. New York requires that if you itemized on the federal return, you must itemize for NY; if you took federal standard, you must take NY standard. NY’s itemized deductions begin with your federal itemized total, but NY makes certain adjustments: For example, state and local income taxes are not deductible on the NY return (since that would be NY letting you deduct NY tax – they disallow that, though you can still deduct property taxes up to the federal cap). New York also has its own limitation for high-income taxpayers called the “Pease” add-back – effectively, if your NY AGI is above about $1,079,250 (2023), most of your itemized deductions get phased out except 50% of charity. Also, NY does not allow the deduction for foreign taxes that was taken on federal Schedule A (they treat it differently). In essence, below those high-income thresholds, NY itemized is similar to federal (just drop state income tax deduction). Above that, itemized deductions get severely limited in NY. Many NY filers in practice just take the state standard if they took federal standard, which is fairly generous for a state standard. |
North Carolina | Has a standard deduction ($12,750 single/$25,500 joint for 2023, which is close to federal) or itemized deductions, but with limitations. North Carolina only allows itemized deductions for: charitable contributions (100% allowed), mortgage interest and property taxes (combined capped at $20,000). Medical expenses, casualty losses, etc., are not deductible on the NC return at all. Also, if you take the federal standard deduction, NC law requires you take the NC standard (you can’t itemize in NC if you didn’t federally). So essentially, NC narrowed itemizing to the big three categories. As a result, many NC taxpayers either take the large NC standard or, if they have a lot of charity/mortgage, they itemize but only count those specific things. This is a result of a tax reform NC did in 2014 to simplify the code and lower rates. |
North Dakota | Uses federal taxable income as a starting point, similar to Colorado and New Mexico. ND’s tax form starts with your taxable income from your federal 1040, then applies its lower flat-ish tax rates. North Dakota doesn’t have its own itemized system; it essentially inherits your federal deductions automatically. ND does offer a couple of subtractions (like a portion of federal tax if you itemized, I believe ND still had a minor adjustment allowing a deduction of federal income tax to a limited extent, but after TCJA and ND reforms, not sure if that still applies). In general, an ND taxpayer doesn’t have to separately calculate a state standard or itemize – it’s done by virtue of the federal starting point. |
Ohio | Ohio does not use itemized deductions. Instead, Ohio provides a personal exemption (around $2,400 per person, varying by income level) and a handful of credits. Ohio starts from federal AGI, subtracts the personal exemptions, and taxes the remaining income with its brackets. It does not allow deductions for things like mortgage interest or charity on the state form. Ohio does have a popular joint filer credit if both spouses work, and a retirement income credit, but those are credits, not deductions. So, your federal write-offs don’t explicitly carry to Ohio except that if you took a big deduction federally, it lowered AGI which then flows to Ohio’s start. But no separate Ohio itemizing. |
Oklahoma | Offers a standard deduction (which matches federal: $13,850 single, etc.) or itemized deductions. Oklahoma requires that you use the same method as on your federal return. So if you did federal standard, you must do OK standard; if you did federal itemized, you can do itemized in OK. Oklahoma’s itemized deductions mostly follow federal, with one key difference: Oklahoma allows deduction of state and local sales or income taxes but uncapped. That said, since you have to have itemized federally to itemize in OK, you were already limited to $10k SALT on the federal. Oklahoma will let you deduct the full amount of property taxes and state income taxes you paid (so effectively, in Oklahoma, the SALT cap doesn’t apply – you can add back what you couldn’t deduct federally due to the cap). Also, OK (like some other states) does not allow deduction of foreign taxes on state return. Oklahoma does allow the deduction for federal income tax paid, but only for corporation tax, not individual – individuals do not deduct federal tax in OK. So for most individuals, just follow the federal itemized, but you get a slight bump if you had >$10k of state/local taxes; you can deduct the full amount on your OK Schedule A. |
Oregon | Provides a standard deduction ($2,420 single/$4,840 joint for 2023) or itemized deductions. Oregon’s itemized deductions are similar to federal with significant state-specific caps: Oregon allows medical deductions (with a lower AGI threshold of 7.5% or possibly no threshold for seniors), allows mortgage interest, charity, etc. However, Oregon has a $10,000 cap on state/local taxes same as federal, AND Oregon has an additional limit: most itemized deductions (except medical, charity, and gambling losses) are capped at $18,000 total for state purposes. Furthermore, high-income earners in OR see their itemized deductions phased out entirely if income is above certain levels. Oregon is one of the few that still allows a deduction for federal income tax paid, but it’s capped at $6,950 (2023) and phased out as income increases above ~$125k. In practice, if you itemize in Oregon, you take your federal itemized worksheet, then apply Oregon’s caps and include up to $6,950 of federal tax as a deduction too. If you took the standard federal, you likely take Oregon standard (since you must have itemized fed to itemize OR). Oregon also has no personal exemption (they replaced it with a credit). Summed up: OR taxpayers often end up using the standard deduction unless they have significant deductions, because of these caps. |
Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania has a unique tax system. No standard or itemized deductions in the traditional sense for PA. Pennsylvania’s income tax is a flat tax on certain classes of income (wages, interest, etc.) with very limited deductions. PA only allows specific deductions from each class of income (for example, certain employee contributions to retirement can be deducted, unreimbursed employee business expenses can be deducted but only in very narrow categories like travel, etc.). There’s no deduction for mortgage interest, property tax, or charity on PA’s return – those concepts don’t exist in PA’s tax code. No personal exemptions either (though everyone gets a relatively low flat rate of 3.07% tax). PA basically taxes gross income with few adjustments (one example: you can deduct medical savings account contributions). For most people, your PA taxable income is almost the same as your wage income reported, without a big standard deduction to reduce it. |
Rhode Island | Offers a standard deduction (around $9,300 single/$18,600 joint for 2023) or itemized. Rhode Island’s rules: If you itemized federally, you have a choice to itemize or take RI standard (whichever benefits you); if you took federal standard, you must take RI standard. The RI standard deduction amounts phase out at higher incomes. If itemizing, RI starts with your federal itemized deductions but disallows the state income tax portion (so only allows property tax from the SALT, plus other categories). Also, RI has personal exemptions (which phase out above certain income). In short, pretty close to federal, with some extra phase-out math for higher earners. Many Rhode Islanders end up taking the standard deduction unless they have significant itemizables, similar to federal outcome. |
South Carolina | Conforms heavily to federal rules. South Carolina uses federal taxable income as a starting point, effectively incorporating whatever standard or itemized deduction you took federally. SC then makes a few adjustments (for example, SC allows deducting all military retirement income, etc., as a subtraction). But SC does not have a separate standard or itemized calculation – it relies on the federal decision. One nuance: SC does allow a deduction for state income tax paid (which is weird since federal taxable income wouldn’t include state tax due to SALT cap). Actually, SC starts with federal taxable, then adds back the state tax you deducted federally (since federal limited to $10k, SC adds back whatever you did deduct for state tax, then allows a full deduction of state taxes paid as its own line item). End result: South Carolina basically gives unlimited SALT deduction on the state return. But aside from that, you don’t recalc your mortgage or charity; it’s already in the federal number. In summary, SC honors your federal write-offs and even sweetens it by giving back the full state tax deduction. |
South Dakota | No state income tax on individuals, so no deductions to worry about. |
Tennessee | No state income tax on wages/salaries. (Tennessee used to tax interest/dividends via the Hall Tax, but that was fully repealed as of 2021. Now TN has no personal income tax at all.) |
Texas | No state income tax on personal income. |
Utah | Does not have itemized deductions per se; instead, Utah uses a credit system. Utah has a flat income tax. Rather than allowing you to deduct itemized expenses, Utah gives a non-refundable tax credit equal to 4.85% (the tax rate) of certain federal deduction amounts. In practice, Utah takes your federal standard or itemized deduction (whichever you claimed) plus your federal personal exemptions (which are zero currently, but UT has its own dependent exemption credit), and then multiplies that sum by 4.85% to give you a credit against Utah tax. This effectively yields the same benefit as a deduction would under a flat tax. So while you won’t “itemize” on a Utah form, you do get the equivalent benefit. If you donate more to charity or have mortgage interest, it increases your federal itemized, which then increases this credit. Utah residents thus still reap write-off benefits, just delivered as a credit. (Also, UT’s credit phases out for very high incomes.) |
Vermont | No itemized deductions allowed. Vermont underwent tax reform after 2017: it eliminated state itemized deductions entirely. Instead, Vermont now provides a Vermont standard deduction (same as federal standard amounts) and Vermont personal exemptions ($4,500 each in 2023). Everyone uses the standard (because itemizing isn’t an option in VT). So, a Vermont return will start with federal AGI, subtract the VT standard deduction and exemptions, and calculate tax. This means if you used to itemize with big mortgage interest, for Vermont it no longer matters – you just take the standard like everyone else. They did this to simplify and to avoid raising state taxes when federal law changed. |
Virginia | Offers a standard deduction ($8,000 single/$16,000 joint for 2023, Virginia recently raised these) or itemized. Virginia requires you to use the same method as federal – if you itemize on federal, you must itemize VA; if you took federal standard, you must take VA standard. Virginia’s itemized deductions generally follow federal rules, with the exception that VA does not allow deduction of state/local income taxes on the VA return (so effectively if you itemize in VA, you might take your federal itemized total and subtract out the state income tax portion, leaving mostly mortgage interest, property tax up to $10k, charity, etc.). VA also has a unique subtraction for Virginia 529 contributions (up to $4k per account per year) and some other subtractions, but regarding write-offs, it mirrors federal pretty closely aside from the SALT tweak. Many more Virginians might take the standard now that VA’s standard deduction has increased significantly, unless they have large charitable or mortgage expenses. |
Washington | No state income tax for individuals. (Though WA has a capital gains tax on certain investment profits as of 2022, but that’s a separate system and doesn’t use deductions like standard/itemized – it allows a $250k exemption and that’s about it.) |
West Virginia | Allows a standard deduction (about $2,000 single/$4,000 joint, plus $500 for each age 65 or older) or itemized. West Virginia follows federal itemized deduction definitions fairly closely, including the SALT cap and so on. You can choose to itemize on WV even if you didn’t on federal (WV is decoupled in that regard). WV also still allows some deductions that federal suspended, like an investment interest or unreimbursed employee expenses to some extent (subject to state regs). Overall, WV’s system resembles the pre-TCJA federal one with standard or itemize option. Many WV taxpayers with modest incomes will take the small standard deduction plus personal exemptions (since WV also has $2,000 per person personal exemption), whereas those with large deductible expenses can itemize. |
Wisconsin | Does not allow federal itemized deductions; instead, Wisconsin uses a special formula. WI provides a sliding-scale standard deduction that decreases as income rises (phasing out around ~$127k for single). In addition, Wisconsin offers an itemized deduction credit: you calculate your federal Schedule A itemizable expenses (but excluding state income tax since WI doesn’t allow that, and some other minor tweaks), then you take 5% of the amount by which those expenses exceed the standard deduction as a credit against Wisconsin tax. In short, rather than reducing taxable income, Wisconsin’s approach is to give you a credit equal to 5% of your would-be itemized excess. For example, if you had $10,000 more in itemizable expenses than the standard deduction, you’d get a $500 credit off your WI tax. This effectively gives a benefit similar to a deduction at the top WI tax rate (~5%). WI’s method is unique but ensures everyone at least gets the standard deduction benefit, and then some credit if their itemizables are higher. |
Wyoming | No state income tax on individuals, so no deductions at state level. |
That comprehensive table shows that state tax write-off rules vary widely. Some states conform almost entirely to federal deductions (making life easy), while others have their own sets of allowable deductions or credits. Always check your state’s rules – a deduction you claim on your federal return might not be allowed on your state return, and vice versa.
One notable pattern: states with no income tax (like Alaska, Florida, Texas, etc.) eliminate the issue entirely by not taxing personal income. States with income tax often start from federal definitions (AGI or taxable income) but may add back certain items or not adopt certain deductions. A few states use credits instead of deductions (Utah and Wisconsin notably). And some states have scrapped itemizing to simplify their system (Indiana, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Vermont, Michigan, New Jersey to varying degrees).
Knowing your state’s stance can help you plan – for instance, if your state doesn’t allow an itemized deduction for something, the benefit of that expense is only on the federal side (or not at all). Or if your state has a lower standard deduction, you might end up itemizing on state when you didn’t on federal. It’s an extra layer to keep in mind.
Notable Court Rulings and Precedents on Tax Write-Offs
Over the years, numerous court cases have helped define the boundaries of what is (and isn’t) a valid tax write-off. Here are a few summarized court rulings that shed light on deductions:
The “Home Office” Case – Commissioner v. Soliman (1993): In this U.S. Supreme Court case, a self-employed anesthesiologist claimed a home office deduction. The Supreme Court initially ruled against him, setting a strict interpretation of “principal place of business” (since he performed surgeries at hospitals, not at home). The case highlighted how narrowly the IRS and courts viewed home office write-offs at the time. (Congress later relaxed the rule in 1997, allowing a home office if it’s for administrative tasks and you have no other fixed location for that work.) Impact: Home office deductions must meet specific criteria (regular and exclusive use, principal place of business), and this case prompted clearer rules. Now, thanks to law changes, more self-employed folks can qualify, but employees still generally cannot (unless that law changes post-2025 or by state law).
The “Breast Implants as a Business Expense” case – Hess (Tax Court, 1994): In an infamous Tax Court decision, an exotic dancer (stage name “Chesty Love”) deducted the cost of her breast augmentation surgery as a business expense, claiming the implants were essentially stage props that increased her income. The Tax Court actually agreed that in her unique circumstance, the surgery was a deductible medical expense for her business (as it was not done for personal cosmetic reasons, but to enhance her performance career). Impact: This case illustrates the principle that an expense that might seem personal can be deductible if it’s sufficiently related to the business and not a normal personal need. It’s a quirky example, but it underscores the “ordinary and necessary” standard – in her line of work, the expenditure was considered ordinary and necessary.
The “Work Clothes” cases – Pevsner (5th Cir. 1980) & Mallary (Tax Court, 1987): Taxpayers have often tried to deduct clothing they wear for work, and courts have generally shut it down unless the clothing is a uniform or not suitable for street wear. In Pevsner, a saleswoman for Yves Saint Laurent sought to deduct the expensive designer clothes she was required to buy and wear at the boutique. She argued she wouldn’t otherwise buy them (not her style). The court denied the deduction because the clothes were adaptable to general use (even if she personally wouldn’t wear them elsewhere, they theoretically could be). Similarly, in Mallary, a TV news anchor tried to deduct the cost of her on-air wardrobe – the Tax Court disallowed it, saying the clothes could be worn outside of work. Impact: These cases cemented the rule that work clothing is only deductible if it’s a uniform or costume not suitable for everyday wear (e.g., a firefighter’s gear, a nurse’s scrubs, or a costume). Just because you wear a suit only to the office doesn’t make it a write-off.
Hobby Loss Rule Reinforced – (Multiple Tax Court cases, e.g., Engdahl v. Commissioner 1988): The Tax Court has seen many cases where taxpayers try to write off losses from activities that the IRS says are hobbies, not businesses. In Engdahl, a couple ran a horse breeding farm that lost money year after year; they claimed deductions for those losses against their other income. The Tax Court allowed their deductions, finding they did have a profit motive (they had a business plan, expertise, and the horse activity showed improving metrics). Conversely, in other cases, like a gentleman deducting boat racing expenses or a person with a sporadically profitable craft sales, the courts denied deductions beyond income, classifying them as hobbies due to lack of profit motive and businesslike practices. Impact: These rulings underscore the factors in Section 183 (“hobby loss” rules). To deduct losses beyond income, you must demonstrate a genuine intent to make a profit. Courts will look at things like: Do you conduct it in a businesslike manner? Do you maintain books, have expertise, devote sufficient time? Do you have a history of profits (or at least efforts to improve)? If not, your deductions can be limited to the hobby income.
Cohan Rule – Cohan v. Commissioner (2nd Cir. 1930): An old but famous case, involving George M. Cohan (a Broadway producer and entertainer). Cohan had deducted a number of travel and entertainment expenses but lacked full receipts. The court established that if a taxpayer can convincingly show they incurred some deductible expense but cannot substantiate the exact amount, the court can make an approximation. This “Cohan Rule” allows approximate deductions in some cases where documentation is lacking (except now there are strict record requirements for certain expenses like meals, lodging, gifts, and listed property – so the rule has limits). Impact: While you should always keep good records, if you end up in court and can prove you did spend money on deductible items (just maybe not the precise amount), the court might allow a reasonable estimate rather than disallowing everything. The IRS, however, is not obliged to apply Cohan during audits – it’s more a litigation principle.
Illegal Businesses and Deductions – Commissioner v. Sullivan (US Supreme Court, 1958) and subsequent law: This line of cases addressed whether expenses of illegal activities are deductible. In Sullivan, a bookmaker running an illegal gambling business tried to deduct rent and wages. The Supreme Court allowed those ordinary business expenses (the logic being the tax law doesn’t punish by denying normal expenses – tax law is separate from legality of business). However, later Congress enacted specific provisions (like disallowing deduction of expenses for drug trafficking in Schedule I or II substances under §280E, and no deduction for fines or bribes). Impact: Generally, if you’re doing something illicit, you might still have to pay taxes on your income (ask Al Capone), but you cannot deduct expenses that are illegal payments (bribes, fines, etc.). Ordinary necessary business expenses might technically be deductible unless a specific law says otherwise (though you’d be self-incriminating to claim them). This is a niche area, but an interesting boundary of “write-offs.”
These rulings (and many others) have shaped the landscape of tax write-offs. The takeaway is that the IRS and courts look at the substance of a situation. If an expense is genuinely business-related (even if unusual), it may be allowed; if it’s personal in nature, it will be denied, even if you try to weave it into a business context. Over time, Congress often codifies responses to court decisions (as they did with the home office and hobby loss rules). Staying within the well-established rules is the safest bet – straying into gray areas could land you in Tax Court trying to defend a deduction.
FAQs About Tax Write-Offs (Based on Common Questions)
Finally, let’s address some frequently asked questions that people (on forums and elsewhere) have about tax write-offs. These quick answers will clear up typical points of confusion:
Q: Are tax write-offs only for businesses or can individuals have them too?
A: NO. Tax write-offs are not exclusive to businesses. Individuals can also claim deductions (like the standard deduction or specific itemized expenses) to reduce their personal taxes.
Q: Do I need to own a business or LLC to write off expenses on my taxes?
A: NO. You don’t need an LLC or formal business to deduct expenses. If you have income from self-employment (even as a sole proprietor), you can write off ordinary expenses on a Schedule C without an LLC.
Q: If I take the standard deduction, does that mean I have no write-offs?
A: NO. The standard deduction is a write-off – it’s a built-in deduction everyone gets. You’re still benefiting from a tax reduction, just without listing specific expenses. (And you may have above-the-line deductions too.)
Q: Is a tax write-off the same as a tax credit?
A: NO. A write-off (deduction) reduces taxable income, whereas a credit reduces the tax you owe directly. Both save you money, but credits generally save you more per dollar. (Example: $1,000 credit saves $1,000 in tax; a $1,000 deduction might save $200–$370 in tax depending on your bracket.)
Q: Can I deduct work expenses as an employee (W-2)?
A: NO (not on federal taxes currently). From 2018 through 2025, employees cannot deduct unreimbursed job expenses on their federal return. Only self-employed workers can. (A few states still allow it, but federal doesn’t.)
Q: If I have a side gig, can I write off the expenses even if it’s not a formal business?
A: YES. Income from a side gig (freelance or “1099” work) is considered self-employment income. You can deduct related expenses (equipment, supplies, mileage, etc.) on Schedule C. Just treat it like a business on your taxes.
Q: My hobby earns a little money – can I write off what I spend on it?
A: YES, but only up to the hobby income amount (and NO if it exceeds income). You can’t deduct hobby losses against other income. To deduct more, run it as a business with intent to make profit; otherwise, hobby expenses beyond hobby income aren’t deductible.
Q: Do I get a tax refund for the full amount of a write-off?
A: NO. A write-off reduces your taxable income, not a dollar-for-dollar refund. It lowers your tax by your marginal rate. (E.g., a $500 deduction might save you about $100 in tax, not give $500 back.)
Q: Can too many write-offs trigger an audit?
A: YES, it could raise suspicion if write-offs are unusually high relative to income. The IRS uses algorithms to flag returns. Always ensure your deductions are legitimate and well-documented to withstand any scrutiny.
Q: Are medical expenses tax-deductible?
A: YES, but only if you itemize AND the expenses exceed 7.5% of your AGI. Even then, only the portion above that threshold is deductible. Many people’s medical costs won’t be high enough to write off.
Q: Can I claim both the standard deduction and itemized deductions together?
A: NO. It’s one or the other on your federal tax return. Take whichever gives you the bigger tax break. (One exception: certain above-the-line deductions are allowed even if you take the standard.)