If you are in removal proceedings or have a case before the Board of Immigration Appeals, you must use Form EOIR-33 to update your address within five working days of any move. Failing to file this short form can lead to an in absentia removal order under INA § 240(b)(5)(A), even if you never received the hearing notice.
The Department of Justice reports that more than 30% of immigration court cases end in in absentia orders, and missed mail is one of the top reasons. The good news is that filing Form EOIR-33 takes only minutes when you know which boxes to check, where to send it, and how to serve the government.
Here is what you will learn in this guide:
- 📬 How to choose between the EOIR-33/IC and EOIR-33/BIA versions
- 🖊️ A line-by-line walkthrough of every field with real examples
- ⚖️ The legal consequences of late, missing, or wrong filings under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.15(d)
- 🧭 Court-specific filing quirks across all 70+ immigration courts and the BIA in Falls Church
- 🛡️ How to protect yourself from in absentia removal using Matter of M-R-A- and related precedent
What Form EOIR-33 Is and Why It Exists
Form EOIR-33 is the official Department of Justice document used to tell an immigration court or the Board of Immigration Appeals that your mailing address has changed. The form exists because INA § 265(a) requires every noncitizen to report a change of address within ten days, and 8 C.F.R. § 1003.15(d) tightens that deadline to five working days for anyone in removal proceedings. The Executive Office for Immigration Review created the form so respondents have a single, standard way to update the court record.
The plain-English meaning is simple: if the court cannot reach you, the court will assume you do not care. The consequence of skipping the form is severe, because under INA § 240(b)(5)(A), an immigration judge can order you removed in absentia if you miss a hearing after proper notice was sent to your last known address. A common misconception is that the Form AR-11 filed with USCIS also updates the court, but it does not. You must file a separate EOIR-33 with the court or the Board.
The Two Versions of EOIR-33
There are two distinct versions of Form EOIR-33, and choosing the wrong one is one of the most frequent filing errors. The EOIR-33/IC is for cases pending before an immigration court, and there is a separate PDF for each of the 70+ courts because each one has its own mailing address pre-printed on the form. The EOIR-33/BIA is for cases that have moved up on appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals in Falls Church, Virginia.
The consequence of filing the wrong version is that the receiving office may reject it, and your address will not update in the active record. For example, if your case is on appeal but you send an EOIR-33/IC to the immigration court, the court no longer has jurisdiction and the BIA will not see the update. A real-world tip is to check your most recent hearing notice or BIA briefing schedule to see which body has your case before you pick the form.
Who Must File the Form
Every person in removal, deportation, exclusion, or rescission proceedings must file Form EOIR-33 after a move, and that includes detained respondents who transfer between facilities. Represented respondents must still file the form themselves, although the attorney typically prepares it and signs as the preparer. Even if your attorney files an E-28 notice of appearance with a new attorney address, the respondent’s personal address must be updated separately on EOIR-33.
The consequence of assuming someone else will file is that the court still treats the respondent as the responsible party for receiving notices. A common scenario involves a respondent who moves in with a relative and assumes the relative’s address on the attorney’s letterhead is enough, but the court mails hearing notices to the address on file in EOIR-33, not to attorney letterhead. The misconception that ICE updates the court when a detainee transfers is also wrong, because ICE custody changes do not flow into the EOIR system automatically.
Step-by-Step: Filling Out the EOIR-33/IC
The EOIR-33/IC is a one-page form with a header block, a respondent information section, an address section, a certificate of service, and a signature line. The current revision is dated and posted on the EOIR forms list, and you should always download a fresh copy for the specific court rather than reusing an old one. Filling it out by hand in black ink is acceptable, but typing into the fillable PDF reduces rejection for illegibility.
The plain-English instruction is to treat each box as a question the judge will see. The consequence of leaving a field blank or mismatched with the Notice to Appear is that clerks may reject the filing or, worse, file it without linking it to your A-file. A common misconception is that you can write “same” or draw arrows between fields, but the EOIR clerk’s office routinely rejects shorthand entries.
Header: Court Location and A-Number
The top of the form lists the immigration court that has your case, and you must download the version pre-addressed to that court because filings sent to the wrong court can be discarded under local operating procedures. Your Alien Registration Number, or A-number, goes in the top-right box and must match the nine-digit number on your NTA, beginning with “A” followed by nine digits if you were issued one after May 2010.
The consequence of an incorrect A-number is that the clerk cannot match the form to your case in the ECAS electronic system, and the update will not post. Example: Maria Lopez has A 234-567-890 on her NTA, so she writes “A234-567-890” exactly, with no extra digits. A common misconception is that an old eight-digit A-number from a prior case can be used, but the court only links updates to the A-number associated with the active proceeding.
Respondent Name and Aliases
Write your full legal name exactly as it appears on the NTA, last name first, then first name, then middle name. If you have used aliases, list them in the alias field, because the clerk searches the system by all known names and a missed alias can cause the address update to fail. The consequence of using a married name when the NTA shows a maiden name, without listing both, is that the system may not match the filing.
Example: Carlos Hernández-Pérez, listed on the NTA as “HERNANDEZ PEREZ, CARLOS,” writes the name in that exact order on EOIR-33. A common misconception is that diacritical marks like accents or ñ matter; the EOIR system stores names in plain ASCII, so write the name to match the NTA’s spelling even if your passport uses accents. If your name is misspelled on the NTA, file a separate motion to correct the record instead of changing the spelling on EOIR-33.
Old and New Address Fields
The form asks for your current mailing address and, in some versions, the prior address on file. Use a street address whenever possible because P.O. boxes can delay delivery of certified hearing notices, although they are accepted. The consequence of using a friend’s address without permission to receive mail is that hearing notices may be returned undeliverable, which the court treats as constructive receipt under Matter of M-R-A-, 24 I&N Dec. 665.
Example: Aisha Rahman moves from 100 Main St., Apt 2, Houston, TX 77002 to 4500 Westheimer Rd., Unit 14, Houston, TX 77027 and writes the new address in full, including apartment number, ZIP+4 if known, and a working phone number. A common misconception is that you can list multiple addresses; the form accepts only one mailing address, and that single address controls all future notices. If you live in a shelter, write the shelter name and full street address, not just “shelter.”
Telephone Number and Language
Provide a phone number where the court or your attorney can reach you, even though hearing notices arrive by mail. The language line tells the court which interpreter to schedule, and changing your stated language without filing a separate notice can cause hearing delays. The consequence of leaving the language line blank is that the court defaults to the language listed on the NTA, which may no longer be your preference.
Example: Jean-Baptiste Pierre updates his number to a new cell and lists “Haitian Creole” as his best language, even though the NTA listed “French.” A common misconception is that the language box updates the interpreter for past hearings; it only affects future scheduling. If you need a rare-language interpreter, also file a written request through the EOIR Policy Manual interpreter procedures.
Certificate of Service
The bottom of EOIR-33 includes a Certificate of Service, where you swear that you mailed or delivered a copy to the ICE Office of the Principal Legal Advisor attorney handling your case. You must list the OPLA office address, the date of service, and the method, such as first-class mail or hand delivery. The consequence of skipping service on DHS is that the court will reject the filing under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.32(a), which requires service of every filing on the opposing party.
Example: If your case is in the Chicago Immigration Court, you serve a copy on OPLA Chicago at 525 W. Van Buren Street, and you write that address in the Certificate of Service. A common misconception is that emailing OPLA is enough; most local OPLA offices require paper service unless a standing order authorizes email service. Always keep your stamped or signed proof of service for at least the duration of your proceedings.
Step-by-Step: Filling Out the EOIR-33/BIA
The EOIR-33/BIA is similar to the IC version but is mailed to the Board of Immigration Appeals in Falls Church, Virginia. You use this form only after the immigration judge has issued a final order and either party has filed a Notice of Appeal Form EOIR-26. Filing the BIA version while your case is still before the immigration court is a frequent and consequential error.
The plain-English rule is that whichever office currently has your case is the office that must receive the address update. The consequence of sending a BIA form before an appeal is filed is that the BIA has no record of you and will return or discard the form. A common misconception is that filing both versions “to be safe” helps; it does not, because only the office with active jurisdiction posts the update.
Cover Letter and Captioning
Although the BIA does not require a cover letter, including one with the BIA case number, A-number, and a one-line description (“Respondent’s Change of Address”) helps the BIA mailroom route the form. The caption inside the form should match the BIA briefing schedule, which lists the parties and case number exactly. The consequence of mismatched captions is delayed docketing, which can affect the running of briefing deadlines.
Example: If your appeal is captioned “Matter of Maria LOPEZ, A234-567-890,” your cover letter and form caption must use that spelling and number. A common misconception is that the BIA tracks address updates by name alone; the BIA tracks by A-number, so the A-number must be correct. Always send the BIA form by a tracked method like USPS Certified Mail because the BIA does not issue receipt confirmations.
Service on OPLA Appellate
For BIA filings, service goes to the OPLA Appellate Division in Falls Church, not to the local OPLA office that handled your trial-level case. The Certificate of Service must list the Appellate Division’s current address, which the BIA Practice Manual updates periodically. The consequence of serving the wrong OPLA office is that the BIA may strike the filing for improper service.
Example: Hassan Ali, whose case was tried in Atlanta but is now on appeal, serves OPLA Appellate in Falls Church rather than OPLA Atlanta. A common misconception is that DHS shares filings internally between trial and appellate offices, but each office maintains its own filing inbox. Confirm the current Appellate Division address in the latest BIA Practice Manual Chapter 3 before mailing.
Where and How to File Form EOIR-33
You can file EOIR-33 by mail, in person at the court window, or, in many courts, electronically through the EOIR Courts and Appeals System (ECAS). Mail is the universal default, in-person filing is allowed at most courts during clerk hours, and ECAS is mandatory for registered attorneys but optional for pro se respondents. The consequence of mailing to the wrong court address is delay or loss, because EOIR forms are not forwarded between courts.
The plain-English rule is to use the address pre-printed on the version of EOIR-33 you downloaded for your specific court. A common misconception is that ECAS is open to everyone; pro se filers can only use it if their court participates in the pro se ECAS pilot. When in doubt, certified mail with return receipt remains the safest paper-trail method.
Filing in Detained Cases
Detained respondents file EOIR-33 with the immigration court that has jurisdiction over the detention facility, not the court closest to their lawyer’s office. When ICE transfers a respondent to a new facility in another state, the case is often transferred under a motion to change venue filed on Form EOIR-33 plus a separate motion. The consequence of filing only EOIR-33 after a transfer is that the case stays at the original court while your address says you are elsewhere.
Example: Diego Morales is transferred from the Stewart Detention Center in Lumpkin, Georgia, to an Arizona facility, so his attorney files both an EOIR-33 with the Stewart court and a motion to change venue to the Eloy Immigration Court. A common misconception is that transfer alone changes venue automatically, but venue change requires a written motion under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.20.
Filing While Represented
Attorneys filing through ECAS upload the EOIR-33 as a PDF and select the “Change of Address” event. The respondent must still sign the form, even though the attorney files it, because the address attestation is personal to the respondent. The consequence of an attorney signing the respondent line is potential bar discipline and rejection of the filing under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.102, which governs attorney conduct.
Example: Attorney Sarah Kim e-signs as the preparer, but she sends the form to her client Priya Patel for a wet signature scan before uploading. A common misconception is that an Form G-28 on file allows the attorney to act as the respondent for address purposes, but G-28 is a USCIS form and does not apply to EOIR proceedings; the EOIR equivalent is Form EOIR-28.
Three Common Scenarios
Real-world filings rarely look like a perfect textbook example, so the table below walks through three of the most popular EOIR-33 scenarios. Each row pairs the move with its filing consequence so you can pattern-match your situation. The scenarios assume the respondent is in active removal proceedings.
| Move Situation | Filing Consequence |
|---|---|
| Respondent moves to a new apartment in the same city | File EOIR-33/IC with the same court within 5 working days; service on local OPLA |
| Respondent relocates to another state with a different immigration court | File EOIR-33/IC with current court plus a motion to change venue under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.20 |
| Respondent is detained and transferred between ICE facilities | File EOIR-33/IC with the court over the new facility plus a venue motion; serve OPLA at the new location |
The plain-English takeaway is that the form alone is enough only when the court stays the same. The consequence of relying on EOIR-33 alone after a cross-state move is that your case stays at the old court, where you will not appear, leading to an in absentia order. A common misconception is that DHS will move the case for you because they know you transferred, but DHS handles custody, not court venue.
Legal Framework Behind the Form
Form EOIR-33 sits at the intersection of three important legal sources, and understanding each one helps you see why the deadlines are so short. INA § 265(a) creates a general 10-day reporting duty for all noncitizens, 8 C.F.R. § 1003.15(d) shortens that to 5 working days for those in proceedings, and INA § 240(b)(5)(A) authorizes in absentia removal for missed hearings.
The plain-English version is that Congress wanted the courts to be able to find you, and the regulations make missing the form expensive. The consequence of ignoring the framework is that even if you have a strong asylum or cancellation case, an in absentia order can wipe out your day in court. A common misconception is that you can fix any problem later with a motion to reopen, but reopening under INA § 240(b)(5)(C) is limited to specific grounds and tight deadlines.
Notice and Pereira / Niz-Chavez
The Supreme Court held in Pereira v. Sessions, 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018), and reaffirmed in Niz-Chavez v. Garland, 141 S. Ct. 1474 (2021), that a Notice to Appear must contain the time and place of the hearing in a single document to trigger certain stop-time consequences. While these cases focus on cancellation of removal eligibility, they also reinforce that defective notice can be a defense to in absentia removal.
The plain-English consequence is that even if you missed filing EOIR-33, you may still defend an in absentia order if the original NTA was defective. Example: Fatima Diallo received an NTA without a hearing time, then moved without filing EOIR-33; her attorney can argue improper notice under Niz-Chavez. A common misconception is that Pereira/Niz-Chavez excuses the duty to file EOIR-33; it does not, but it can blunt the worst consequence.
Matter of M-R-A- and Constructive Notice
In Matter of M-R-A-, 24 I&N Dec. 665 (BIA 2008), the Board held that a respondent who provides a correct address and does not receive notice may rebut the presumption of delivery. The case matters for EOIR-33 because the protection only applies if you actually filed a current address with the court. The consequence of not filing EOIR-33 is that you cannot use M-R-A- because there is no clean record of a current address.
Example: When Jorge Ramos filed EOIR-33 promptly but the post office returned the notice, he successfully reopened his in absentia order using M-R-A- factors. A common misconception is that any address on file is enough; the BIA looks at whether the address was current at the time of mailing, which depends on timely EOIR-33 filings.
Mistakes to Avoid
Most rejected EOIR-33 filings fail for a small set of repeated reasons, and each one carries a distinct consequence that can ripple through the entire case. The list below covers the seven most common mistakes practitioners and pro se filers make.
- Filing the wrong version, EOIR-33/IC instead of EOIR-33/BIA, after an appeal is filed, which leaves the BIA record stale and risks missed briefing deadlines.
- Skipping the Certificate of Service to OPLA, which violates 8 C.F.R. § 1003.32 and triggers rejection of the filing.
- Using a P.O. box without a working forwarding plan, which can lead to undelivered hearing notices and constructive receipt under M-R-A-.
- Writing the A-number incorrectly or using an expired number, so the clerk cannot match the filing to your active case in ECAS.
- Relying on a Form AR-11 USCIS filing to update the court, which does not transmit to EOIR and leaves the court with the old address.
- Forgetting to file a motion to change venue when moving across court jurisdictions, which keeps the case at the old court and risks an in absentia order.
- Letting the attorney sign the respondent line, which violates the personal-attestation rule and can lead to discipline under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.102.
Do’s and Don’ts
The following do’s and don’ts come from current EOIR practice and the latest EOIR Policy Manual. Each item carries a brief reason so you can apply the rule to unusual fact patterns.
Do: – Do download the court-specific PDF from the EOIR forms page every time, because court mailing addresses change. – Do file within 5 working days of moving, because 8 C.F.R. § 1003.15(d) is strict and clerks count business days. – Do keep a stamped copy or ECAS confirmation, because you may need to prove timely filing later. – Do serve OPLA every time, because failure to serve is independent grounds to reject. – Do file a separate venue motion when the move crosses jurisdictions, because EOIR-33 alone does not transfer cases.
Don’t: – Don’t write “same as before” in the new address field, because clerks read the form literally and may reject it. – Don’t list two addresses, because the system stores only one mailing address of record. – Don’t use the BIA form before an appeal is filed, because the BIA has no jurisdiction yet. – Don’t ignore the language box, because interpreter scheduling depends on it. – Don’t rely on email to OPLA unless a local standing order authorizes it.
Pros and Cons of Filing Methods
Each filing method has trade-offs that matter for proof and speed. The points below summarize the main pros and cons of mail, in-person, and ECAS filing.
Pros: – Certified mail provides a return receipt that proves the filing date for M-R-A- defenses. – In-person filing at the court window gives you a date-stamped copy on the spot. – ECAS filing is instant and timestamps the upload to the second. – Attorney ECAS filings link directly to the case docket and the eRegistry. – Mailed filings work for pro se respondents in every jurisdiction.
Cons: – Certified mail is slower and can arrive after the 5-day deadline if you wait too long. – In-person filing requires travel to the court, which is hard for detained respondents. – ECAS is not open to all pro se filers, and account approval can take days. – Email service to OPLA is inconsistent across districts and risks rejection. – Paper filings can be lost in the mailroom, especially at high-volume courts like New York and Los Angeles.
Court-Specific Nuances Across Jurisdictions
Although the EOIR-33 form is uniform, local immigration courts apply different operating procedures, and ignoring those procedures can cause rejection even when the form itself is perfect. Courts like San Francisco, Boston, and Arlington maintain their own filing windows and clerk hours. The consequence of arriving after hours is that the filing is treated as received the next business day, which can blow the 5-working-day window.
The plain-English rule is to read the latest Operating Policies and Procedures Memoranda for your court before filing. A common misconception is that all 70+ courts handle EOIR-33 identically; some courts require a self-addressed stamped envelope for return of a stamped copy, while others use ECAS-only intake. Example: The Houston Immigration Court processes paper EOIR-33 through a centralized mailroom, while Hyattsville prefers ECAS uploads.
Detained Court Quirks
Detained dockets operate on accelerated schedules, and courts at facilities like Stewart, Eloy, and Adelanto handle EOIR-33 through facility legal mail. The consequence of using regular ICE mail rather than legal mail is that the form may be opened and delayed.
Example: Maria Vega’s attorney sends the EOIR-33 to Stewart marked “Legal Mail” so it bypasses the general inmate mail queue. A common misconception is that a free legal services list provider can file from outside without the respondent’s signature; the respondent must still sign.
BIA Falls Church Quirks
The Board of Immigration Appeals in Falls Church, Virginia, accepts paper filings at its dedicated address listed in the BIA Practice Manual, and the form must be three-hole punched at the top, although missing punches rarely cause rejection. The consequence of mailing to the immigration court instead of the BIA after appeal is loss of the filing.
Example: When attorney Robert Chen files for client Lin Wei after a notice of appeal, he uses the BIA Falls Church mailing address from the BIA Practice Manual. A common misconception is that the BIA accepts ECAS filings from all attorneys; ECAS for the BIA expanded in stages, so verify your case is ECAS-eligible.
Three Named Examples in Practice
The examples below show how three different respondents handled EOIR-33 in real-world conditions. Each example illustrates the rules above and the consequence of the choices made.
First, Carlos Hernández moved within Houston and filed an EOIR-33/IC with the Houston Immigration Court within three days, served OPLA Houston, and kept his certified mail receipt. When ICE later claimed his hearing notice was returned, Carlos used Matter of M-R-A- to defeat an in absentia motion.
Second, Aisha Rahman relocated from Texas to Virginia for a new job and filed both an EOIR-33/IC with Houston and a motion to change venue to the Arlington Immigration Court under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.20. The judge granted venue change, and Aisha’s hearings continued without disruption.
Third, Jean-Baptiste Pierre transferred from a Florida ICE facility to one in Louisiana, and his attorney filed EOIR-33/IC with the new court along with a venue motion. The consequence of acting within five days was that no hearing was missed, and the case proceeded on the detained docket at the Oakdale Immigration Court.
Key Entities You Should Know
Several agencies and offices touch EOIR-33 filings, and knowing their roles prevents costly routing errors. The Executive Office for Immigration Review houses the immigration courts and the BIA. The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor is the DHS prosecuting arm that must be served. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services handles AR-11 but not EOIR address updates.
The plain-English mapping is: EOIR is the court, OPLA is the prosecutor, USCIS is a separate benefits agency. The consequence of confusing them is filing the right form with the wrong office, which is treated as no filing at all. A common misconception is that the Department of Homeland Security and EOIR share systems; they do not, and EOIR-33 must reach EOIR directly.
Comparing EOIR-33 With Related Forms
Several immigration forms touch on address or appearance changes, and confusing them is one of the top reasons cases go off the rails. The table below compares the four most commonly confused forms.
| Form Name | Primary Purpose |
|---|---|
| EOIR-33/IC | Change respondent address with an immigration court |
| EOIR-33/BIA | Change respondent address with the Board of Immigration Appeals |
| Form AR-11 | Change address with USCIS for benefits cases under INA § 265 |
| Form EOIR-28 | Attorney notice of appearance before an immigration court |
The plain-English rule is to file the form that matches the office holding your matter. The consequence of filing only AR-11 when you are in removal proceedings is that the court still mails to the old address. A common misconception is that EOIR-28 updates the respondent’s address; it updates only the attorney’s contact information.
Recap of Relevant Rulings
Several BIA and federal court rulings shape how EOIR-33 issues play out, and knowing them helps you and your attorney plan a defense. Matter of M-R-A-, 24 I&N Dec. 665 (BIA 2008) lets a respondent rebut the presumption of delivery with sworn affidavits and corroborating evidence. Matter of G-Y-R-, 23 I&N Dec. 181 (BIA 2001) holds that in absentia removal is improper when the NTA was sent to an address the respondent never received and could not reasonably have known about.
Matter of Bulnes, 25 I&N Dec. 57 (BIA 2009) addresses motions to reopen based on lack of notice. Pereira v. Sessions and Niz-Chavez v. Garland limit the stop-time effect of defective NTAs. The consequence of knowing these cases is that even a missed EOIR-33 filing may not be fatal if notice was defective from the start.
FAQs
Do I have to file EOIR-33 if I only moved to a new apartment in the same building?
Yes. Any change in unit number, street, or ZIP code triggers the 5-working-day duty under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.15(d), regardless of distance moved.
Does filing Form AR-11 with USCIS update my immigration court address?
No. AR-11 updates only USCIS records, and you must file a separate EOIR-33 with the immigration court or BIA to update your court address.
Can my attorney sign EOIR-33 for me?
No. The attorney can prepare and file the form, but the respondent must personally sign because the address attestation is personal under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.15.
Is EOIR-33 the same as a motion to change venue?
No. EOIR-33 only updates your address, while a motion to change venue is needed to move the case to a new immigration court.
Will I be ordered removed in absentia if I miss the deadline?
Yes. Under INA § 240(b)(5)(A), missing a hearing after notice was sent to your last filed address can result in in absentia removal.
Can I file EOIR-33 by email?
No. Most courts do not accept email filings of EOIR-33 from pro se respondents, although attorneys can file via ECAS if registered.
Do I need to serve ICE every time I file EOIR-33?
Yes. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.32(a) requires service on OPLA for every filing, including address changes, with a Certificate of Service.
Can I reopen an in absentia order if I forgot to file EOIR-33?
Yes. A motion to reopen under INA § 240(b)(5)(C) may succeed if you can show lack of notice or exceptional circumstances, though it is harder without a current EOIR-33 on file.
Is the EOIR-33/BIA form different from the EOIR-33/IC?
Yes. They are separate PDFs on the EOIR forms page, and you must use the version matching the office that currently holds your case.
Can detained respondents file EOIR-33 on their own?
Yes. Detained respondents can file through facility legal mail to the immigration court overseeing the detention site, ideally with help from a pro bono provider.
Does filing EOIR-33 stop the running of any deadlines?
No. EOIR-33 only updates your address and does not toll briefing, appeal, or motion deadlines set by the EOIR Policy Manual.
Can I list a P.O. box on EOIR-33?
Yes. P.O. boxes are accepted, but a street address is preferred because some certified hearing notices require physical delivery confirmation.
Related reading
- How to Fill Out USCIS Form AR-11 (w/Examples) + FAQs
- How to Fill Out DOJ Form EOIR-26 (w/Examples) + FAQs
- How to Fill Out DOJ Form EOIR-28 (w/Examples) + FAQs
- How to Fill Out DOJ Form EOIR-29 (w/Examples) + FAQs
- How to Fill Out DOJ Form EOIR-42A (w/Examples) + FAQs
- How to Fill Out DOJ Form EOIR-42B (w/Examples) + FAQs
- How to Fill Out USCIS Form I-821 (w/Examples) + FAQs