How to Fill Out Florida Order of Restoration of Capacity (w/Examples) + FAQs

A Florida Order of Restoration of Capacity is the signed court order that legally returns some or all civil rights to a ward after a circuit court guardianship judge finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the ward can again exercise those rights under Florida Statute 744.464. The order is prepared as a proposed order by the ward, the ward’s attorney, or the guardian, and then submitted to the judge for signature after the suggestion of capacity has been reviewed.

This document is the final piece of the restoration process that began when a Suggestion of Capacity was filed under Florida Probate Rule 5.560 and the Florida Probate Rules PDF. Florida courts close roughly 1,200 to 1,500 guardianship cases each year through restoration or termination, and clerks reject a meaningful share of proposed orders for missing findings, vague rights lists, or incorrect case captions, so getting every box right matters.

Here is what this guide will give you:

  • 📜 A line-by-line walkthrough of every section of the proposed order, written in plain English.
  • 🧾 Three full filled-out scenarios using named wards with realistic facts.
  • ⚖️ The exact statutes, rules, and deadlines that govern restoration in Florida.
  • 🗂️ A pre-filing checklist of attachments and information you must gather.
  • 🛡️ The most common mistakes filers make and how to avoid each one.

What the Order of Restoration of Capacity Is and Who Files It

The Order of Restoration of Capacity is a circuit-court order entered in the existing guardianship file that either restores all rights removed at the original adjudication of incapacity or restores only some of those rights, as authorized by section 744.464(3), Florida Statutes. The order is the judge’s written ruling, but in Florida practice the proposed order is almost always drafted by the moving party and uploaded with the Notice of Hearing or after the unopposed medical examination.

The people who actually prepare and submit the proposed order include the ward (who can file the suggestion of capacity pro se), a family member, the guardian, the guardian’s attorney, or the ward’s own attorney under Florida Probate Rule 5.550. The judge signs the final order; the filer’s job is to draft it correctly so the judge does not have to rewrite it.

The order matters because, until it is signed and recorded, the ward still legally cannot vote, marry, contract, sue, drive, choose a residence, consent to medical treatment, or manage money, depending on which rights were originally removed. A correctly drafted order on a form modeled after the Florida Courts self-help portal is the legal switch that turns those rights back on.

The order is filed in the same circuit court that issued the original letters of guardianship, under the same case number. It is not a new lawsuit, and it does not start a new probate file.

Before You Start: Documents and Information You Need

Restoration is a documents-heavy process, and the proposed order has to match the record exactly. Gathering everything before you draft saves the embarrassment of an order being rejected for clerical mismatch with the underlying Order Determining Incapacity.

Use this pre-filing checklist:

  • The ward’s full legal name, date of birth, and current address. The caption must mirror the original incapacity order; a single character mismatch can stall e-filing.
  • The probate case number (e.g., 2021-CP-001234-O). Without it, the clerk cannot route the order to the correct judge in the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal.
  • The original Order Determining Incapacity that lists every right removed. The new order must reference each right by the same wording.
  • The Suggestion of Capacity already filed under Fla. Stat. §744.464(1). The proposed order must cite the date it was filed.
  • The court-appointed physician’s medical examination report required by Fla. Stat. §744.464(2). Attach a filed-stamped copy.
  • Proof of service on the guardian, the guardian’s attorney, the ward, the ward’s attorney, and any next of kin who appeared, per Fla. Prob. R. 5.041.
  • The Notice of Hearing (if a hearing is set) showing date, time, courtroom, and Zoom link if applicable.
  • The guardian’s most recent annual guardianship report from Fla. Stat. §744.367, so the judge can confirm the current rights still being exercised by the guardian.
  • A government-issued photo ID for the ward if a hearing is scheduled, because some divisions ask the ward to identify themselves on the record.
  • The filing fee or a fee-waiver affidavit. Most counties charge a small motion fee; Miami-Dade and Broward sometimes charge nothing for restoration motions, while Orange and Hillsborough may bill a few dollars under the Florida Clerks fee schedule.

If any single one of these is missing, the judge will likely defer signing until the record is complete, and the 30-day clock under Fla. Stat. §744.464(3)(a) can lapse without an order being entered.

Where to Get the Form and How to Access It

Florida does not publish a single statewide fill-in-the-blank PDF for the Order of Restoration of Capacity the way it does for some family law forms. Instead, the proposed order is drafted from scratch using the structure required by Florida Probate Rule 5.560 and the findings mandated by Fla. Stat. §744.464. Many circuit clerks post local templates on their self-help pages.

You can pull templates that judges in your circuit are used to seeing from the Ninth Judicial Circuit forms library for Orange and Osceola counties, the Eleventh Judicial Circuit for Miami-Dade, the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit for Broward, and the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit for Hillsborough. The Florida Courts forms hub is the starting point if your county has nothing posted.

The order is filed electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal under the existing probate case number. Self-represented wards register for a free portal account, while attorneys file under their Bar number.

If you cannot e-file because you lack internet access, Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.525 lets you file paper at the clerk’s intake counter; the clerk scans the document and uploads it to the docket.

Step-by-Step: How to Fill Out the Florida Order of Restoration of Capacity Line by Line

The proposed order has eleven distinct sections, each of which must mirror the structure approved in Fla. Prob. R. 5.560. Take them in order, top to bottom; the judge reads them in that order too.

1. Court Caption (Court Name, County, Division)

The caption sits at the very top of the page and tells the clerk which judge owns the case. It typically reads IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE [number] JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR [county] COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROBATE DIVISION.

To answer it, copy the caption verbatim from the original Order Determining Incapacity. Use ALL CAPS, center the text, and break each line where the prior order broke it.

A specific example: Maria Lopez, whose guardianship sits in Orange County, would type IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROBATE DIVISION.

A nuance to watch is the division designation. Some counties split probate into “Probate” and “Guardianship” sub-divisions, and Miami-Dade uses Division 01 through Division 05 for guardianship; using the wrong division code routes the order to the wrong judge.

A common mistake is pasting the caption from a different case in the same family (for example, a deceased parent’s probate). The clerk’s e-filing system flags the case number mismatch and bounces the document, costing days.

A frequent misconception is that the caption can be shortened to “Circuit Court, Orange County.” Florida’s e-filing portal pattern-matches the full statutory caption, and shortcuts trigger rejection.

2. Case Number

The case number anchors the order to the existing guardianship file so the order is docketed correctly. It is usually formatted YYYY-CP-XXXXXX-XX, where CP stands for Circuit Probate.

To answer, type the case number exactly as it appears on the most recent court order, including hyphens, leading zeros, and the division suffix. Place it on the right side of the caption block.

For example, Carlos Rivera’s case number reads 2019-CP-004127-O; he types it that way, with the trailing -O showing the Orange County division.

A nuance is that some counties dropped the alphabetic suffix in 2022 e-filing updates, while others kept it; check the most recent docket sheet on the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal before you draft.

A common mistake is transposing two digits in the middle of the number, which causes the proposed order to land in a stranger’s case file and forces a corrective filing under Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540.

A misconception is that you can “create” a new case number for the restoration; restoration is always filed under the same case number as the original incapacity adjudication, never a new one.

3. Title of the Order

The title tells anyone reading the docket what the document does. The standard title is ORDER OF RESTORATION OF CAPACITY in bold, ALL CAPS, centered.

To answer, type those exact words. If the order restores only some rights, you may title it ORDER PARTIALLY RESTORING RIGHTS TO WARD to signal scope, although either title is acceptable under Fla. Stat. §744.464(3)(c).

For example, Janet Pham, whose ward is regaining only the right to vote and marry, titles her proposed order ORDER PARTIALLY RESTORING RIGHTS TO WARD.

A nuance is that judges in some divisions prefer the term Order Restoring Some Rights; check the judge’s standing order before drafting.

A common mistake is using the title Order Granting Suggestion of Capacity, which is procedurally inaccurate because the court grants the capacity itself, not the suggestion.

A misconception is that the title controls the legal effect; in reality, it is the findings and decretal paragraphs that determine which rights are restored, regardless of how the title reads.

4. Preamble Recitals

The preamble identifies the matter that came before the court and the procedural history. It usually starts THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Suggestion of Capacity filed by [name] on [date], and the Court, having reviewed the file, the medical examination report, and being otherwise fully advised, finds as follows:.

To answer, fill in the suggester’s name, the date of filing of the suggestion, and any hearing date. Keep it to one sentence; judges dislike paragraph-long preambles.

For example, Aisha Bennett writes: THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Suggestion of Capacity filed by Aisha Bennett on March 14, 2026, and the medical examination report filed on April 2, 2026.

A nuance is that if the suggestion was filed by the ward themselves, the preamble should say filed pro se by the Ward, which signals to the judge that the ward exercised the right to file under Fla. Stat. §744.464(1).

A common mistake is forgetting to list the medical exam date; without it, the judge cannot confirm the 30-day decision clock under Fla. Stat. §744.464(3)(a).

A misconception is that the preamble must recite every prior order in the case; only the suggestion of capacity, the medical exam, and any objection are required.

5. Findings of Fact

This is the most important block and the one judges scrutinize hardest. Fla. Stat. §744.464(3)(b) requires specific findings of fact on a preponderance of the evidence standard.

To answer, write numbered findings such as: 1. The Ward, [name], is the subject of the guardianship established by Order Determining Incapacity entered on [date]. 2. A Suggestion of Capacity was filed on [date]. 3. A court-appointed physician examined the Ward on [date] and filed a written report on [date]. 4. The medical examination establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that the Ward has regained capacity to exercise the rights listed below. 5. No timely objection has been filed (or, if filed, was overruled at hearing on [date]).

For example, Marcus Greene’s findings note that Dr. Sandra Liu examined him on April 18, 2026, found his bipolar disorder fully managed, and concluded he can manage his own finances and contracts.

A nuance is the partial-restoration finding: if only some rights are returning, the judge must find that the ward has capacity for those specific rights, not capacity in general, per Fla. Stat. §744.464(3)(c).

A common mistake is using the catch-all phrase “the Ward has regained capacity” without tying it to specific rights, which fails the specific findings requirement and may be reversed on appeal, as appellate panels have flagged in cases like In re Guardianship of Sapp.

A misconception is that the medical report alone is enough and the order can simply say “the Court adopts the report”; the statute requires findings by the court, not adoption-by-reference.

6. List of Rights Being Restored

This is the operative checklist that controls what the ward can legally do tomorrow morning. The rights track Fla. Stat. §744.3215, the rights-of-persons-with-developmental-disabilities and incapacity statute.

To answer, list each right being restored on its own line. Common rights include: to marry; to vote; to personally apply for government benefits; to have a driver license; to travel; to seek or retain employment; to contract; to sue and defend lawsuits; to apply for government services; to manage property or make gifts; to determine residence; to consent to medical treatment; and to make decisions about social environment.

For example, Maria Lopez has all rights restored, so her order lists each right from §744.3215 verbatim, in numbered form.

A nuance is that the right to vote and the right to manage property are often restored separately; the judge can return one without the other, and the Florida Division of Elections will not re-register the ward to vote until the right is specifically named.

A common mistake is restoring “all rights previously removed” without listing them; the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, the Social Security Administration, and banks frequently refuse to act on a generic order, which forces a corrective motion.

A misconception is that restored rights apply retroactively; they apply prospectively from the date the order is signed, never backward.

7. Rights, If Any, Retained by the Guardian

If the restoration is partial, this paragraph spells out which rights the guardian still holds. It is required by Fla. Stat. §744.464(3)(c).

To answer, list every right the guardian continues to exercise, again tracking the §744.3215 list. If full restoration is granted, write None. The guardianship is terminated upon entry of this Order.

For example, Janet Pham’s ward keeps the right to have the guardian manage real property and make gifts, so those two rights are listed and all others fall back to the ward.

A nuance is that retained rights trigger a new annual plan; the guardian must file a fresh guardianship report within 60 days under Fla. Stat. §744.464(3)(c).

A common mistake is leaving this paragraph blank when only some rights are restored, which creates ambiguity and can void the order on collateral attack.

A misconception is that the guardian automatically loses all authority once any right is restored; the guardian keeps every right not specifically returned in this paragraph.

8. Discharge or Continuation of the Guardian

This paragraph tells the clerk whether to close the guardianship file or keep it open. It must be unambiguous.

To answer, write either The guardianship is hereby terminated, and [Guardian Name] is discharged upon filing the final guardianship report and accounting under Fla. Stat. §744.527 or The guardianship shall continue as a limited guardianship over the rights retained above.

For example, Marcus Greene’s order discharges his guardian, his sister Dana, after she files a final accounting within 45 days.

A nuance is that the discharge is not effective until the guardian files the final report and the court enters a separate order of discharge; restoration alone does not relieve the guardian of fiduciary duty.

A common mistake is writing “the guardian is discharged effective immediately” without conditioning discharge on the final accounting; that language has been struck by appellate courts because it leaves the ward’s assets unaccounted for.

A misconception is that termination of guardianship erases the guardian’s bond; the bond stays in place until the final accounting is approved by the Florida circuit court clerks.

9. Effective Date

The effective date controls when the ward can walk into a bank, the supervisor of elections, or the DMV and exercise the restored right.

To answer, write This Order is effective immediately upon entry by the Court. Avoid future effective dates unless there is a tactical reason, such as aligning with a benefits redetermination.

For example, Aisha Bennett’s order is effective the moment the judge signs, which lets her register to vote that same afternoon at the Florida Division of Elections.

A nuance is that some agencies, including the Social Security Administration, require a certified copy of the signed order before they will recognize the restoration, so the effective date should not be earlier than the date the certified copy is reasonably obtainable.

A common mistake is leaving the effective date blank, which creates an argument that the restoration never legally took hold.

A misconception is that the effective date is the date the suggestion of capacity was filed; it is always the date the judge signs the order.

10. Signature Block (Judge)

The signature block is reserved for the judge. The filer formats it but does not sign it.

To answer, type DONE AND ORDERED in [County] County, Florida, on the date stamped below. Leave a signature line and below it type CIRCUIT JUDGE.

For example, Carlos Rivera’s proposed order ends with DONE AND ORDERED in Orange County, Florida, on the date stamped below. ________ CIRCUIT JUDGE.

A nuance is that since 2012, Florida judges sign electronically through the Florida Courts e-signature system, and the date stamp appears at the top of the order, not next to the signature.

A common mistake is including the judge’s printed name in the signature block; if the judge is reassigned before signing, the printed name will be wrong, and the clerk will reject the order.

A misconception is that you can sign for the judge as “approved as to form”; only the parties’ attorneys may sign approval-as-to-form blocks, never the judge’s signature itself.

11. Certificate of Service

The certificate of service confirms that every interested person received a copy. It is required by Fla. Prob. R. 5.041 and Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.516.

To answer, list the name, role, address, and email of every person served, plus the date and method of service (E-portal, email, U.S. mail). Sign and print your name beneath the list.

For example, Maria Lopez serves the guardian, the guardian’s attorney, the court-appointed physician, and the Office of Public and Professional Guardians under Fla. Stat. §744.2001.

A nuance is that the Office of Public and Professional Guardians must be served whenever a professional guardian is involved.

A common mistake is omitting the ward’s own attorney from the service list; the ward is always entitled to notice, even when they are the moving party.

A misconception is that e-filing alone counts as service; e-filing only files the document, while service requires separate delivery to each party’s email of record.

Three Filled-Out Examples Using Real Scenarios

Each of the three named filers below walks through the proposed order from caption to certificate of service.

Scenario 1: Maria Lopez — Full Restoration After Mental Health Recovery

Form Section What Maria Enters
Caption IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROBATE DIVISION
Case Number 2021-CP-004127-O
Title ORDER OF RESTORATION OF CAPACITY
Preamble THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Suggestion of Capacity filed pro se by the Ward, Maria Lopez, on February 10, 2026.
Findings of Fact Dr. Helena Park examined the Ward on March 1, 2026, and concluded by a preponderance of the evidence that the Ward has regained full capacity.
Rights Restored All rights previously removed are hereby restored, including the rights to vote, marry, contract, sue and defend, drive, manage property, determine residence, and consent to medical treatment.
Rights Retained by Guardian None. The guardianship is terminated upon entry of this Order and the filing of the final accounting.
Effective Date Effective immediately upon entry.
Signature Block DONE AND ORDERED in Orange County, Florida, on the date stamped below. _____ CIRCUIT JUDGE
Certificate of Service Served via E-portal on guardian James Lopez, his attorney, and Dr. Park on April 5, 2026.

Scenario 2: Carlos Rivera — Partial Restoration for an Adult with Developmental Disability

Form Section What Carlos’s Mother Enters
Caption IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROBATE DIVISION
Case Number 2018-CP-002001-FC-04
Title ORDER PARTIALLY RESTORING RIGHTS TO WARD
Preamble THIS CAUSE came on the Suggestion of Capacity filed by Sofia Rivera as natural mother on January 8, 2026.
Findings of Fact Dr. Aaron Klein found by a preponderance of the evidence that Carlos Rivera has capacity to vote, marry, and choose his social environment.
Rights Restored The rights to vote, to marry, and to determine social environment are restored to the Ward.
Rights Retained by Guardian The guardian retains authority to manage property and to make medical decisions involving surgery.
Effective Date Effective immediately upon entry.
Signature Block DONE AND ORDERED in Miami-Dade County, Florida. _____ CIRCUIT JUDGE
Certificate of Service Served on the guardian, OPPG, and the examining committee via E-portal on February 20, 2026.

Scenario 3: Janet Pham — Restoration After Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation

Form Section What Janet’s Attorney Enters
Caption IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROBATE DIVISION
Case Number 2023-CP-000877-A
Title ORDER OF RESTORATION OF CAPACITY
Preamble THIS CAUSE came on the Suggestion of Capacity filed by the Ward, Janet Pham, on March 4, 2026, following 18 months of rehabilitation.
Findings of Fact Dr. Priya Shah, neurologist, found cognitive function fully restored by a preponderance of the evidence.
Rights Restored The rights to drive, contract, sue and defend, manage property, and consent to medical treatment are restored.
Rights Retained by Guardian None. The guardianship is terminated upon final accounting.
Effective Date Effective immediately upon entry.
Signature Block DONE AND ORDERED in Hillsborough County, Florida. _____ CIRCUIT JUDGE
Certificate of Service Served on guardian Linh Pham via email and U.S. mail on April 1, 2026.

How to File the Completed Order

Florida accepts the proposed order through three primary channels, and the channel you choose affects how fast the judge sees it.

Online (preferred). Upload the proposed order as a Microsoft Word file through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal under the existing probate case number. Most counties charge no extra fee to upload a proposed order, although filing the underlying suggestion of capacity may carry a small motion fee under the Florida Clerks of Court fee schedule. Processing time is usually 7 to 21 days, and your proof of filing is the portal’s automated email receipt.

By mail. Send the proposed order in Word format on a USB drive plus a hard copy to the clerk of the circuit court for the county where the guardianship is open; for example, the Orange County Clerk of Courts at 425 N. Orange Avenue, Orlando, FL 32801. Include a self-addressed stamped envelope so the clerk can return a conformed copy. Processing typically takes 14 to 30 days; payment is by check or money order.

In person. Walk the proposed order into the clerk’s intake counter at the courthouse. The clerk will scan it, give you a stamped copy, and route it to the assigned probate judge. Same-day filing is possible if you arrive before 4:00 p.m.

By fax. A small number of counties still accept fax filings under emergency circumstances; check the local administrative order before relying on this channel.

Always keep the conformed-stamped copy in your records; it is your proof that the order was lodged with the court.

What Happens After You File

Once the proposed order is in the docket, the judge reviews the file, the medical examination report, and any objections. If no objection has been filed and the medical report is satisfactory, Fla. Stat. §744.464(3)(a) directs the judge to enter the order, with most divisions doing so within 14 to 30 days.

If an objection has been filed, the case is set for an adjudicatory hearing under Fla. Stat. §744.1095. The ward bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that restoration is warranted, and the examining committee members may be called to testify.

After the order is signed, the clerk e-mails a conformed copy to every party of record. The ward should immediately request two certified copies from the clerk; agencies like the Social Security Administration and the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles require certified copies, not plain printouts.

Within 60 days of a partial restoration, the guardian must file a new guardianship report addressing only the retained rights, per Fla. Stat. §744.464(3)(c). If restoration is full, the guardian files a final accounting under Fla. Stat. §744.527, and the court enters a separate order of discharge.

Mistakes to Avoid When Filling Out the Form

Restoration orders are bounced more often for clerical errors than for substantive ones; here are the recurring traps.

  • Wrong case number. Even one transposed digit sends the order to the wrong file and forces a corrective filing.
  • Generic rights list. Saying “all rights previously removed” without enumerating them will be refused by banks, the DMV, and the supervisor of elections.
  • Missing findings of fact. Skipping the specific findings required by Fla. Stat. §744.464(3)(b) is grounds for reversal on appeal.
  • No medical exam reference. The order must cite the date the report was filed, or the judge cannot confirm jurisdiction to act.
  • Forgetting OPPG service. Failing to serve the Office of Public and Professional Guardians when a professional guardian is involved invalidates service.
  • Discharging the guardian immediately. Discharge must be conditioned on the final accounting; otherwise assets go unaccounted for.
  • Future effective date. Picking a date weeks out gives bad actors a window to challenge or unwind restoration.
  • Pasting the wrong caption. Copying from a different family case (such as a parent’s probate) triggers automatic e-portal rejection.
  • Omitting the certificate of service. Without it, the order is procedurally incomplete and clerks will not docket it as ready for judicial review.
  • No signature line for the judge. A draft without a signature line will be returned for reformatting, costing days.
  • Failing to attach the medical report. The judge cannot enter the order without it in the file.
  • Misnumbering the rights. Skipping a number in the §744.3215 list creates ambiguity that follows the ward to every agency.

Do’s and Don’ts

A handful of habits separate clean orders from rejected ones.

  • Do copy the caption from the most recent court order so it matches the file character-for-character.
  • Do list each restored right on its own numbered line so agencies can cite the specific paragraph.
  • Do request two certified copies from the clerk the moment the order is signed.
  • Do serve the Office of Public and Professional Guardians whenever a professional guardian is involved.
  • Do keep the conformed-stamped copy and the e-portal receipt in one folder.
  • Do condition the guardian’s discharge on the filing of the final accounting under Fla. Stat. §744.527.

  • Don’t use “all rights previously removed” as a shortcut; enumerate them.

  • Don’t sign for the judge or backdate the order.
  • Don’t skip the certificate of service; e-filing is not service.
  • Don’t open a new case number for restoration; use the existing guardianship case.
  • Don’t rely on a homepage form; use your circuit’s local template.
  • Don’t forget that partial restoration triggers a new annual report within 60 days.

Pros and Cons of Filing on Your Own vs. With Help

Restoration is one of the few guardianship steps where pro se filing is realistic, but professional help still has value.

Pros of filing pro se:

  • No attorney fees, which can save the ward thousands.
  • The ward controls timing and tone of the suggestion.
  • The Florida Courts self-help portal and circuit clerks provide guided forms.
  • The statute itself, Fla. Stat. §744.464, expressly permits the ward to file.
  • A successful pro se filing reinforces the ward’s autonomy on the record.

Cons of filing pro se:

  • Drafting specific findings of fact is hard without legal training.
  • Service of process under Fla. Prob. R. 5.041 is unforgiving.
  • Contested hearings under Fla. Stat. §744.1095 require evidentiary skill.
  • Mistakes can delay restoration by months.
  • Banks and agencies often demand more polished orders than what pro se filers produce.

FAQs

Do I need a lawyer to file an Order of Restoration of Capacity?

No. Fla. Stat. §744.464 lets the ward file pro se, but most wards benefit from a lawyer for contested hearings or drafting precise findings.

How long does it take to get the order signed?

Yes, there is a 30-day target. Under Fla. Stat. §744.464(3)(a), the court should sign within 30 days of the medical report when no objection is filed.

Can I write “all rights previously removed” in the rights paragraph?

No. Agencies and banks need each right named individually, and judges routinely strike vague catchall language as inconsistent with specific-findings requirements.

What goes in the case number box?

Yes, use the original guardianship case number, not a new one; the format is YYYY-CP-XXXXXX-XX, copied from the most recent court order in the file.

Do I list the right to vote separately from the right to contract?

Yes. Each civil right under Fla. Stat. §744.3215 is treated as a distinct right, and listing them separately avoids agency confusion.

Should I include the judge’s printed name in the signature block?

No. Leave only a blank line and the words CIRCUIT JUDGE; reassignments happen often, and a printed name can force a redraft.

Is the order effective the day the suggestion was filed?

No. It is effective the day the judge signs, never the date the suggestion of capacity was filed.

Can the order restore some rights but not others?

Yes. Fla. Stat. §744.464(3)(c) expressly allows partial restoration, with the guardian retaining the rights not specifically returned.

Do I need to serve the Office of Public and Professional Guardians?

Yes, whenever a professional guardian serves the ward, OPPG must receive a copy under the regulatory framework administered by the Florida Department of Elder Affairs.

What happens if the guardian objects to the restoration?

Yes, the case proceeds to an adjudicatory hearing under Fla. Stat. §744.1095, where the ward must prove capacity by a preponderance of the evidence.

Will my Social Security representative payee status change automatically?

No. The Social Security Administration requires a certified copy of the order plus a separate request to terminate representative-payee status.

Do I write the date of the original incapacity order in the findings?

Yes. Reference it by date in finding number 1 so the judge can confirm the order being modified, which is required for specific findings under Fla. Stat. §744.464(3)(b).

Can I e-file from home?

Yes, through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal using a free self-represented account; uploads are accepted 24 hours a day.

Does the order automatically discharge the guardian’s bond?

No. The bond stays in effect until the final accounting is approved and a separate order of discharge is signed under Fla. Stat. §744.527.