Who Can Really Claim the Section 179 Deduction? – Don’t Make This Mistake + FAQs

Lana Dolyna, EA, CTC
Share this post

If you could save thousands on your taxes this year, would you do it?

An estimated 78% of small businesses use Section 179 deductions to offset their tax bills. That’s a huge number, and it shows how popular this tax break is. But the real question is: can you claim a Section 179 deduction?

Who Can Claim the Section 179 Deduction? 🎯 (The Quick Answer)

Almost any business owner who purchases qualifying business equipment can claim a Section 179 deduction. If you run a trade or business and buy or finance tangible assets (like machinery, computers, or vehicles) for use in that business, you’re likely eligible.

Section 179 isn’t restricted to certain types of businesses or industries—it’s available to sole proprietors, LLCs, partnerships, S-corporations, C-corporations, and any other form of business entity. Even a one-person freelancer or a side hustler can use Section 179, as long as the purchase is for business use.

However, eligibility comes with a few important conditions:

  • The asset must be used more than 50% for business purposes. (No, you can’t write off your personal car you barely use for work—business use needs to be predominant.)
  • The property has to be purchased and placed into service within the tax year you’re claiming the deduction. In other words, you must buy it (or finance it) and start using it before year-end.
  • It must be qualifying property (more on that below, but think tangible items like equipment, vehicles, software—not real estate or stocks).
  • You must have business income to absorb the deduction. Section 179 can’t create a tax loss — it can only bring your taxable business income down to zero (any excess can usually be carried forward to next year).
  • The total amount you deduct can’t exceed the annual Section 179 limit (for example, $1,250,000 for 2025 under federal law). This is a high ceiling aimed at benefiting small and mid-sized businesses; if you spend more than the threshold (about $3.13 million in 2025), your Section 179 benefit starts to phase out.

In plain terms: if you’re actively running a business and you buy stuff for that business, you can probably use Section 179 to deduct the cost upfront. It doesn’t matter if your business is full-time or a side gig, nor whether it’s profitable or just breaking even—though profitable is where Section 179 really shines. The deduction is designed to encourage investment by letting you expense (write off) the full cost of assets immediately instead of depreciating over years.

💡 Pro Tip: Even used equipment qualifies for Section 179 now, as long as it’s new to you and not purchased from a related party. You don’t have to buy brand-new assets to benefit from this tax break.

So, who can’t claim it? Generally, individuals who are not business owners cannot claim Section 179 on their personal taxes. For example, if you’re a W-2 employee with unreimbursed work expenses, Section 179 won’t apply (and post-2018, you usually can’t deduct those expenses at all). It’s a perk meant for business investments, not personal purchases.

Now that we’ve covered the basics of who qualifies, let’s make sure you avoid some common mistakes that could derail your deduction.

🚫 Avoid These Section 179 Pitfalls (Who Can’t Claim It and Why)

Even if you’re eligible, there are some easy-to-miss pitfalls that can prevent you from claiming Section 179 or reduce your benefit. Don’t fall into these traps:

  • Using Property <50% for Business: To claim Section 179, you must use the asset more than half the time for business. If it’s 50% or less, it’s disqualified. For example, a vehicle you drive 40% for deliveries and 60% for personal errands won’t get a Section 179 deduction. Always track your business use (mileage logs for vehicles, usage logs for equipment) to prove it’s over 50%. ⚠️

  • Trying to Write Off Personal Expenses: This one’s a no-brainer, but worth stating: personal purchases don’t qualify. Only assets used in a trade or business count. You can’t buy a new bedroom TV and call it “office equipment” just because you sometimes answer emails from bed. The IRS is pretty sharp about sniffing out personal items claimed as business expenses. Keep it honest and save yourself an audit headache. 🙅‍♂️

  • Claiming Section 179 Without Income: Remember, Section 179 can’t put you into a loss. If your business has no taxable income for the year (or very little), your deduction is limited. Don’t try to deduct more than your net business income (which includes wages and income from all your active businesses combined). For instance, if your business shows $10,000 of profit and you bought a $20,000 machine, you can only claim up to $10,000 as Section 179 this year. The remaining $10k isn’t lost—you can carry it forward to next year—but you won’t get an immediate tax benefit beyond your income. Plan your purchases accordingly so you’re not left with unused deductions.

  • Exceeding the Annual Cap: The IRS sets a maximum dollar limit each year for Section 179. If you try to expense more than that, the excess won’t be allowed (though, again, you might carry it into future years or use other depreciation methods). For example, if the cap is $1.25 million and your company buys $1.5 million of equipment, you can Section-179 up to $1.25M but not the extra $250k (that portion can be depreciated normally or possibly taken as bonus depreciation). Also, if you go on a spending spree that exceeds the phase-out threshold (around $3.13M in purchases for 2025), your Section 179 limit reduces dollar-for-dollar. Extremely large investments (think big corporations buying an entire fleet of machinery well above the threshold) might phase out the deduction completely. The rule is there to target the tax break to small and mid-size businesses. Be aware of these limits before you count on a full write-off.

  • Buying Ineligible Assets: Not everything is fair game for Section 179. Some common non-qualifiers include:

    • Real estate and buildings (you generally cannot Section-179 a building itself or land). However, certain improvements to non-residential buildings (like a new roof, HVAC system, or security system) do qualify under Section 179 since recent tax law changes—so check the list of qualifying property (see the Key Terms section below for details).
    • Inventory or property held for sale (Section 179 is for assets you use in your business, not those you sell to customers).
    • Intangible assets like trademarks or goodwill. (Section 179 mostly covers tangible personal property and some computer software.)
    • Property acquired from related parties or by gift/inheritance. If you bought the asset from your spouse, your parents, your kids, or a business/entity you control, the IRS says “no deduction.” The purchase needs to be an arm’s-length, legitimate business acquisition.
    • Certain vehicles have special limits (more on that in a moment).
  • Ignoring Vehicle Limits: Vehicles used for business can qualify for Section 179, but there are extra rules. If it’s a passenger vehicle (like a car, SUV, or light truck under a certain weight), the tax code caps how much you can deduct in the first year, even with Section 179. For heavy SUVs (those weighing over 6,000 lbs but still classified as passenger vehicles), there’s a specific Section 179 limit of $28,900 (for 2023), adjusted annually for inflation (around $31,000 for 2025). So, if you buy a heavy SUV for $60k and use it 100% for business, the most Section 179 can immediately expense is about $30k — the rest would follow normal depreciation or bonus depreciation. For regular passenger cars under 6,000 lbs, the limits are even lower (roughly $10k–$12k in the first year, plus bonus depreciation if available). 🚗 Bottom line: don’t assume you can write off a luxury car or SUV all at once. Know the vehicle depreciation limits so you’re not surprised.

  • Forgetting to “Elect” Section 179: Section 179 is not automatic — you have to elect it by claiming it on your tax return (usually by filling out Part I of Form 4562 for each asset you want to expense). Most tax software or accountants will handle this if you indicate you want the deduction. But if you simply don’t include the election, you’ll miss out and default to regular depreciation. Always double-check that your return properly claims Section 179 for the assets you intended. It sounds basic, but paperwork slip-ups happen, especially for new business owners self-preparing taxes. ✅ Tip: Work with a CPA or use reputable tax software to ensure you fill out the deduction correctly. It’s a one-time formality that unlocks significant savings.

By steering clear of these mistakes, you’ll ensure that you’re firmly on the right side of the rules and able to reap the full benefits of Section 179. Next, let’s clarify some terminology and rules so you know exactly what counts as a qualifying purchase.

🤔 Key Terms and Concepts for Section 179 (Decoded)

To truly master Section 179, you need to understand a few key tax terms and rules that come up in this context. Let’s break them down in plain language:

  • Section 179 Deduction: A tax deduction that allows you to immediately expense (write off) the cost of qualifying business property. It’s named after Section 179 of the Internal Revenue Code. Think of it as taking all your depreciation upfront in one tax year. You elect this deduction on your tax return for each asset you want to fully expense.

  • Qualifying Property (Section 179 Property): Not every asset qualifies. Generally, tangible personal property used in business qualifies. This includes:

    • Equipment and machinery (from manufacturing machines to coffee makers in your office).
    • Computers and office equipment (printers, desks, etc.).
    • Business vehicles (with the >50% business use caveat and special dollar caps for certain vehicles as discussed).
    • Furniture and fixtures for business use.
    • Software that’s “off-the-shelf” (mass-produced, not custom-coded solely for you).
    • Qualified improvements to real property: Certain improvements to non-residential buildings, like HVAC systems, roofs, fire alarms, and security systems can be deducted under Section 179. (This was expanded by law in recent years—good news for storefronts and offices updating their facilities).
    • Portable structures like certain storage sheds or manufacturing modules (if not considered a building).

    Excluded property: Land, building structures, land improvements (like paving), and assets used outside the U.S. are not eligible. Also, any property used for lodgings (i.e., residential rental property) generally doesn’t qualify for Section 179, with some exceptions for things like furnished corporate apartments (this gets into gray areas – when in doubt, ask a tax advisor).

  • Placed in Service: The date when an asset is ready and available for business use. This is key. You must place the item in service within the tax year to deduct it. For example, if you buy a machine in December but it’s stuck in transit and you only install it in January, technically you can’t claim Section 179 for it in December’s tax year. Make sure you receive and start using the asset by December 31 if you’re aiming for that year’s deduction.

  • Deduction Limit (Annual Cap): The maximum amount you can deduct under Section 179 in a single year. Federally, this is $1,250,000 for tax year 2025 (it was $1,160,000 for 2023, and it generally increases slightly each year for inflation). This cap applies to the combined total of all Section 179 deductions you take, not per asset. So you could buy ten $100k assets and still deduct $1M+, as long as you don’t exceed the overall limit. It’s a “use it or carry it forward” situation each year — you can’t deduct above the cap in the current year (excess just waits for future years).

  • Phase-Out Threshold: The spending level at which the Section 179 deduction starts being reduced. In 2025, this threshold is $3,130,000 in total qualifying purchases. For every dollar you spend above that on qualifying property, your maximum deduction limit drops by a dollar. Essentially, if you go big on equipment spending, Congress says, “okay, at a certain point, you’re not a small business anymore for this tax break.” If you spend enough to hit about $4,380,000 in 2025, your Section 179 deduction would completely phase out ($4.38M being $1.25M over the threshold). Very few small businesses hit this, but it’s possible for larger ones. Note that this is total spent on Section 179-eligible property — it doesn’t matter if you plan to Section 179 all of it or not; the calculation looks at your spending to decide if your deduction limit should shrink.

  • Business Income Limitation: This rule says your total Section 179 deduction cannot exceed your net business income for the year. Net business income means the taxable profit from all your trades or businesses combined, plus (for individuals) any wages you earned. Yes, interestingly, if you have a day job with W-2 wages and a side business, those wages count as “business income” for this purpose, potentially allowing a bigger Section 179 deduction for your side business assets. But crucially, Section 179 cannot create or increase a loss. If after all your other deductions your business side is at a loss, Section 179 will be limited to bring you up to zero and no further. Any disallowed portion due to this can be carried over to future years, where you try again (subject to that next year’s income and limits).

  • Carryover (Carryforward): If you have more Section 179 deduction than you can use (because of the business income limit or because you went over the cap), you don’t lose it forever. The unused amount carries forward to the next tax year. Next year, it’s as if you have an additional Section 179 deduction available (subject to that year’s own limits). This carryover can continue indefinitely until used, but it still remains subject to the income limitation each year. Think of it like “banking” the deduction for a future profitable year. Keep track of any carryover on your tax forms so you remember to use it later.

  • Listed Property: This is a category of assets that the IRS “lists” as having a high potential for personal use, such as cars, SUVs, and any property that could be used for entertainment (like cameras, or even cell phones in the past). For listed property, the IRS requires strict substantiation of business use. If you don’t keep good records, your deduction can be denied. Also, if you use listed property (like a car) for business but then later drop the usage to 50% or less, you may have to recapture (pay back) some of the Section 179 or accelerated depreciation you took. In simple terms: if you claim a big deduction on your work truck, then next year mostly use it for personal trips, expect the IRS to want some of that deduction back via income inclusion. Stay above 50% business use for the asset’s life or be ready to handle recapture calculations.

  • Bonus Depreciation: Often mentioned alongside Section 179, bonus depreciation (IRC Section 168(k)) is another tool to write off asset costs faster. Currently, bonus depreciation allows a percentage of cost to be deducted in the first year for qualifying property, regardless of business income, and even if you don’t elect Section 179 or you’ve maxed it out. For a few years (2018-2022) it was 100% (so basically full expensing, similar to 179). It’s phasing down now (80% in 2023, 60% in 2024, 40% in 2025, etc.). The key differences: Bonus depreciation can create a loss (no income limit), it doesn’t have an annual dollar cap, and you don’t pick and choose assets (it automatically applies to all in a class unless you opt out). Both Section 179 and bonus can be used in tandem. Typically, you apply Section 179 first to the assets you choose, then bonus depreciation on the remaining balance or other assets, then regular depreciation on whatever’s left.

  • MACRS (Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System): This is the standard depreciation system for tax purposes. If you don’t (or can’t) use Section 179 or bonus on an asset, you’ll depreciate it over several years under MACRS. For example, computers are 5-year property, cars 5-year, office furniture 7-year, most machinery 7-year, farm equipment 5-year, etc., with specific depreciation percentages each year. MACRS is the baseline; Section 179 and bonus are like acceleration boosters. Knowing this isn’t crucial for claiming Section 179, but it’s good background. If Section 179 is a one-time shot and bonus is a big first-year chunk, MACRS is the marathon that spreads deductions out. Sometimes businesses intentionally opt to use MACRS for some assets instead of Section 179, to save deductions for future years (particularly if they expect higher income or tax rates later).

Now that you’re fluent in the lingo and rules of Section 179, let’s put this knowledge into a real-world context with some examples.

📊 Section 179 in Action: Detailed Examples and Scenarios

Understanding theory is one thing, but seeing how Section 179 works for actual businesses cements the knowledge. Let’s explore a few real-world scenarios that illustrate who can claim Section 179 and how the limits play out:

Example 1: Fully Utilizing Section 179 for a Profitable Small Business
Imagine Alice, a freelance graphic designer who operates as a sole proprietor. In 2025, her design business is doing well and will net about $80,000 in profit. Alice decides to upgrade her equipment and buys a new high-end graphic design computer and printer for $10,000 in December 2025. Because her business profit ($80k) far exceeds the cost of the equipment, she can deduct the full $10,000 under Section 179 in 2025. Come tax time, Alice files a Schedule C with her Form 1040 and includes a Form 4562 electing the $10k Section 179 deduction for her new gear. This write-off directly reduces her taxable business income from $80k to $70k, saving her perhaps around $2,200 in federal taxes (assuming roughly a 22% tax bracket). She gets the benefit immediately in one year. If she’s in a state that follows federal rules, she’ll see that $10k deduction there too. Alice effectively got a 22% “discount” on her purchase thanks to Section 179. 🎉

Example 2: Section 179 Limited by Income (Carryover Comes into Play)
Now meet Bob, who runs a part-time woodworking business (as an LLC, taxed as a sole proprietor). 2025 was slow; Bob’s net business income is only $5,000. Yet, Bob invested in a fancy new woodworking machine costing $15,000 to prepare for future expansion. He places it in service in September 2025. Can Bob claim Section 179 on the full $15k? He can elect it, but because of the business income limitation, he can only use $5,000 of it to offset his income this year (bringing his taxable business income to zero). The remaining $10,000 of the Section 179 deduction doesn’t vanish—it becomes a carryforward to 2026. In 2026, Bob will add that $10k carryover to any new Section 179 deductions and use it against his business income then. If 2026 is a better year, he can hopefully deduct it. In the meantime, Bob doesn’t get the full immediate benefit, but at least he deducted what he could. If Bob had instead been an employee with $50k of W-2 salary and this $5k business profit, his total “business income” could be considered $55k, and he could have used the full $15k Section 179 (offsetting all $5k of business profit and $10k of his W-2 income, effectively). So the outcome can differ depending on other income. The key lesson: Section 179 can be limited by your profit, but you will get to use it eventually via carryover.

Example 3: Big Investment Hits the Cap and Threshold
Consider Copper Corp, a growing manufacturing company (C-corp) that had a booming year. They have a hefty profit of $5 million in 2025. They decide to invest heavily back into the business by purchasing $4 million worth of new factory equipment and machinery before year-end. Under federal rules, the maximum Section 179 deduction for 2025 is $1.25M, with a phase-out starting at $3.13M. Copper Corp’s spending exceeds the threshold by $(4.00M – 3.13M) = $870,000. This amount above the threshold dollar-for-dollar reduces their maximum Section 179. So instead of $1,250,000, their allowable Section 179 deduction is cut down to $380,000 ($1.25M – $870k). Copper Corp elects to expense $380k of their equipment costs under Section 179. The remaining $3.62 million of equipment cost is still eligible for bonus depreciation (40% in 2025) and regular depreciation. So they might take another $1.448M as bonus (40% of $3.62M) plus depreciate the rest over the assets’ useful lives. Copper Corp gets a huge deduction overall due to bonus, but the key point is they couldn’t Section-179 the full $1.25M because they bought “too much” in one year. Also note, their high profit was not a limiting factor at all here — the income limit wasn’t an issue with $5M profit to absorb deductions, it was purely the spending cap. If Copper Corp had spent, say, $2 million (below the threshold), they could have Section-179’d the full $1.25M (since under cap and threshold, and profit is plenty). When planning big capital expenditures, companies sometimes spread purchases across years to maximize Section 179 each year rather than phasing it out in one year.

We can summarize these scenarios in a quick comparison table:

ScenarioBusiness ProfitEquipment PurchaseSection 179 DeductionOutcome
Small business, profit covers purchase$80,000$10,000 (computer)$10,000 (full deduction)Fully deducted in Year 1; profit $80k drops to $70k taxable.
Low profit, purchase exceeds profit (carryover)$5,000$15,000 (machine)$5,000 used now; $10,000 carryoverDeduction limited to profit; remainder carried to next year.
Large purchase above annual limit (phase-out)$5,000,000$4,000,000 (equipment)$380,000 (reduced by spending cap)Only $380k expensed under §179 due to phase-out; bonus/regular for rest.

These examples cover the major scenarios: a straightforward full deduction, a deduction limited by income, and a deduction limited by the scale of investment. Most small businesses will find themselves in situations like Alice’s or Bob’s, whereas a company like Copper Corp illustrates the upper bounds of Section 179’s usage.

In practice, Section 179 has proven enormously helpful for small businesses. Accountants often share success stories like Alice’s case, where a timely equipment purchase and Section 179 election saved a client thousands on their taxes. And even in cases like Bob’s, tax advisors might counsel going ahead with a Section 179 election knowing the carryforward will eventually benefit the client when the business income rises. The provision is a key part of tax planning for any business acquiring assets.

Now, let’s step back and look at some evidence of Section 179’s impact and why it’s a beloved tax break among entrepreneurs and CFOs alike.

📈 Evidence of Section 179’s Impact (Why It Matters)

Section 179 isn’t just a niche tax rule—it’s a significant factor in business investment decisions across the country. Here are some telling pieces of evidence about its use and impact:

  • Widespread Adoption: As mentioned in the intro, roughly 78% of small businesses reported using Section 179 to reduce their taxes. That is an astounding majority, indicating that this deduction is one of the most widely used tax incentives for businesses. If so many businesses are using it, that suggests you don’t want to leave yourself out of a potentially money-saving party.

  • Billions in Tax Savings: The federal government’s own analyses show Section 179 costs the Treasury billions (which means billions saved by businesses). For instance, a congressional report once noted that in a single year, businesses claimed over $20 billion in Section 179 deductions collectively. That’s money they didn’t have to pay tax on, freeing up cash for growth, hiring, or just keeping the lights on. This tax break has real, large-scale economic impact, effectively acting as a government incentive for businesses to invest in themselves.

  • Targeted at Small and Mid-Size Businesses: The structure of Section 179 (with the dollar caps and phase-outs) shows that it’s designed to benefit smaller companies the most. And indeed, it does. Most large Fortune 500 companies blow past the limits and can’t use Section 179 beyond maybe a token amount, but small and medium businesses often rely on it heavily. It levels the playing field a bit by giving the “little guys” the chance to get an immediate deduction (where big companies might use other depreciation strategies). For example, a local construction firm might be able to expense all their new equipment in year one, something that was historically out of reach without this provision.

  • Immediate Cash-Flow Benefits: Surveys of business owners and anecdotal evidence from CPAs indicate that Section 179 can improve a company’s cash flow in the year of purchase. Instead of slowly recovering the cost of an asset through depreciation, the tax savings from Section 179 put cash back in the business owner’s pocket right away. This can be critical for small businesses. For example, if a business owner knows they’ll get, say, $20,000 off their tax bill by expensing a big piece of equipment, that might make the difference in whether they can afford the purchase now or have to wait. It essentially acts like an instant rebate from the government on capital expenditures.

  • Encouraging Investment and Growth: Lawmakers have long touted Section 179 (and similar provisions) as a way to spur economic growth. When the economy needs a boost, Congress often increases the Section 179 limits or extends generous bonus depreciation. And when they’ve done so, business investment often ticks up. For instance, when Section 179 limits were temporarily raised in the past or made permanent at higher levels, many industries saw an uptick in equipment sales (farm equipment, construction machinery, technology for offices, etc.), implying that the tax incentive did its job. The continuation of high limits (made permanent in 2015 and indexed for inflation) shows that the government recognizes how crucial this deduction is for planning and confidence—businesses know the rule will be there, so they factor it into their budgets.

  • Supported by Professional Advice: If you consult any small business tax expert or CPA, they will almost universally check if you’re making use of Section 179 where appropriate. It’s considered a fundamental strategy in business tax planning. The fact that it’s a permanent part of the tax code now (not a temporary “extender” as it was in the early 2000s) gives even more certainty. Financial advisors often highlight Section 179 in workshops for entrepreneurs. In short, the experts are using it, and they encourage businesses to use it too.

  • Important Caveat – Bonus Depreciation Phase-Out: While Section 179 itself is stable for now, another similar incentive, bonus depreciation, is currently phasing out through 2026. As bonus depreciation reduces (from 100% a couple years ago down to 40% in 2025, 20% in 2026, and then 0%), Section 179 becomes even more valuable as one of the only ways to fully expense equipment immediately. This means more businesses might turn to Section 179 to fill the gap left by bonus depreciation’s decline. So the number of businesses using Section 179 could grow even higher.

All this evidence underlines that Section 179 is a cornerstone of business tax strategy. It’s popular, it’s powerful, and it’s something every eligible business owner should be aware of.

Next, let’s compare Section 179 with some other depreciation methods and tax strategies to see how it stacks up and when you might choose one over the other.

⚖️ Section 179 vs. Other Depreciation Options (Comparisons)

When it comes to writing off the cost of business property, Section 179 is one tool in a toolbox that includes bonus depreciation and standard depreciation (MACRS). Each has its place. Let’s compare these options to understand their differences and how they can work together:

Section 179 vs. Bonus Depreciation
These two often get mentioned in the same breath because both allow large first-year deductions on assets:

  • Choice and Flexibility: Section 179 gives you the choice of which assets to expense and how much of each (up to the limit). You can pick specific items to fully expense and not use it on others. Bonus depreciation, on the other hand, is generally all-or-nothing by asset class each year (you either take bonus for all assets in a certain depreciation class or elect out for all of them).
  • Limitations: Section 179 has those annual dollar limits and income requirement. Bonus depreciation has no dollar limit and no income requirement – you could create a huge loss with bonus if you wanted (which can then possibly offset other income or carry to other years as an NOL). So if your goal is to generate a loss to carry back or forward, bonus might achieve that where Section 179 cannot. (Note: Currently, NOL carrybacks are limited for most, but prior to 2021 it was something to consider; and future law changes could bring that strategy back.)
  • Eligible Property Differences: Both cover new and used tangible property now. However, bonus depreciation in recent years has also applied to certain classes of property that Section 179 might not (and vice versa for the specialized improvements, though actually Section 179 and bonus largely overlap on what’s eligible after some fixes to the law). One key difference: Qualified Improvement Property (QIP) – improvements to the interior of commercial buildings – are eligible for bonus depreciation (100% through 2022, now phasing down) and are also eligible for Section 179 (up to the cap). So often you have a choice.
  • State Treatment: As we’ll cover in the next section, states often treat these two differently. Many states disallow bonus depreciation entirely but allow some Section 179. So sometimes, for state tax purposes, you might prefer Section 179 since you might get at least a partial immediate deduction at the state level. Bonus might give you zero state benefit in the first year if the state says “add back the bonus”.
  • Sunset vs. Permanent: Section 179 is permanent law (with inflation adjustments). Bonus depreciation is temporary and is currently scheduled to phase out. So looking ahead, Section 179 will likely be the only game in town for immediate expensing on federal returns after bonus goes away (unless laws change again).

In practice, businesses often use both: First apply Section 179 to the extent it makes sense (pick assets up to the deduction limit or up to income limit), then apply bonus depreciation to everything else automatically. It’s not an either/or in many cases – it’s both/and, in a strategic order.

Section 179 vs. Normal MACRS Depreciation

  • Speed of Deductions: Section 179 gives you virtually all of your deduction in Year 1. MACRS spreads it out. For example, a $10,000 machine (5-year MACRS) would give roughly $2,000 depreciation in Year 1 under MACRS, versus $10,000 with Section 179. The trade-off is MACRS gives you deductions in years 2, 3, 4, etc., whereas Section 179 gives nothing in those later years because you already took it.
  • Usefulness of Future Deductions: Sometimes a business might choose to not take Section 179 (or elect out of bonus) on purpose. Why? If they expect to be in a higher tax bracket in future years, or if they simply don’t need the deduction this year (maybe already in a loss, or very low taxable income), they might prefer to have depreciation deductions in upcoming years instead (when they’ll actually save tax). This is a strategic decision. Section 179 is optional on each asset – you could 179 some, and just depreciate others normally to preserve those write-offs for later. It’s all about timing the deductions to when they benefit you most.
  • Simplicity: For very small purchases, sometimes business owners skip Section 179 and just expense things as “supplies” or under the de minimis safe harbor (which allows expensing items under $2,500 without formal depreciation). But for larger assets, Section 179 or MACRS are the way. MACRS is automatic if you do nothing. Section 179 requires an election. But once you decide to 179 something, it actually simplifies your books in future years (no depreciation entry needed for that asset after year 1).
  • Recapture Considerations: If you dispose of an asset early or its use changes, under MACRS you might have remaining basis to deduct (or income to recapture if you sell for more than remaining basis). With Section 179, you’ve taken all benefits upfront, so if you sell the asset, most of the sale price could become taxable gain (since basis may be zero). Also, as noted, for listed property like vehicles, dropping business use below 50% triggers a recapture of Section 179 (basically you have to give back the benefit in part). With MACRS, if you had only depreciated a little so far and then it becomes personal use, the recapture would be less dramatic. However, these scenarios are relatively rare or manageable; the immediate benefit often outweighs them, but it’s good to know.
  • Total Deduction Amount: Either way, Section 179 or MACRS, you’re ultimately deducting the cost of the asset (assuming you use it until fully depreciated or you sell/scrap it). Section 179 just accelerates it. MACRS will eventually give the same total deduction over time (except inflation or changes in business could make future deductions worth more/less in real terms). So Section 179 is largely about timing.

Section 179 vs. Leasing
This is not a direct tax code comparison, but a practical one: If a business leases equipment rather than buys it, how does Section 179 factor in?

  • If it’s a capital lease or lease-to-own (essentially you’re considered the owner for tax purposes), you can still take Section 179 just like a purchase. Many equipment financing agreements are set up this way, so you finance the asset but still get the tax benefits.
  • If it’s an operating lease (true rental, you won’t own it at end), then you don’t own the asset to depreciate or 179 it; instead, your lease payments are deductible business expenses. In such cases, Section 179 isn’t applicable since you’re not the purchaser.
  • Some companies choose a true tax lease to avoid using Section 179, oddly enough. Why? As one strategy, they might prefer to expense the lease payments evenly rather than a big upfront deduction, especially if Section 179/bonus is less valuable to them at the moment. Leasing companies sometimes promote that you can “write off the lease payments” which is true but equivalent to standard expensing.

Section 179 vs. Expense Safe Harbors (De Minimis Rule)
The tax regulations allow businesses to expense items under a certain dollar amount (generally $2,500 per item, or up to $5,000 with an applicable financial statement) without treating them as capital assets. This isn’t Section 179, but it’s another way to instantly expense things.

  • Very small businesses often just rely on this for low-cost equipment (example: you buy a $1,000 laptop, you might just expense it as office expense under the safe harbor rather than capitalize and Section 179 it – both achieve the same immediate deduction, one with less paperwork).
  • Section 179 becomes most useful for larger purchases above those thresholds, where you can’t just expense it as a small tool/supply.
  • It’s worth knowing that if you have an accounting policy for the de minimis rule, you might not even need Section 179 for cheaper assets.

In summary, Section 179 is usually the first line of attack for depreciable asset purchases due to the flexibility and immediate benefit. Bonus depreciation is the powerful ally that kicks in for any remaining balance without many limits (at least until it phases out). Standard depreciation is the fallback for whatever isn’t deducted upfront or for those who choose to spread out deductions. A savvy business will consider all three in their tax strategy:

  • Use Section 179 to maximize immediate write-offs where it makes sense (up to the caps and profit).
  • Use bonus depreciation for the rest when available, unless there’s a reason to opt out.
  • Use MACRS for any leftovers or when deferring deductions strategically.

Now that we’ve tackled federal rules and comparisons, we need to address a wrinkle that often surprises folks: state-level differences. The federal tax code might let you claim Section 179, but your state might not be so generous.

🗺️ Federal vs. State: Section 179 Deduction Across State Lines

Here’s a crucial fact: Not all states follow the federal Section 179 rules. While you can claim the deduction on your federal tax return, some states have their own limits or disallowances for Section 179 (and/or bonus depreciation). This means your state taxable income might be different than your federal taxable income, even if you claim Section 179 federally. Let’s break it down:

  • Full Conformity States: A majority of states “conform” to the federal tax code on Section 179. This means they allow the same deduction amounts and rules on the state tax return as the IRS does on the federal return. If you’re in one of these states, good news: you don’t have to do anything differently. For example, Texas and Florida have no personal income tax, so no state return to worry about for individuals. But even states with income tax like New York, Illinois, Ohio and many others often conform fully, so your state taxable income also gets reduced by the Section 179 deduction just like federal. Check your state’s tax regulations, but if it conforms, you simply carry over the same Section 179 number to your state forms.

  • Modified Conformity States: Some states conform to an older version of the federal tax code or set their own Section 179 limits which are lower than federal. A common scenario: the state imposes a maximum Section 179 deduction of $25,000 (with a phase-out starting at $200,000 of purchases) — these were the federal limits in the early 2000s. States like California, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Hawaii, Maryland, Minnesota, and Kentucky (among others) historically had lower Section 179 caps in this ballpark. For instance, California currently only allows up to $25,000 of Section 179 deduction, with a phase-out beginning at $200,000 of purchases. If you deducted $1,000,000 on your federal return, for California taxes you’d only get $25k; the other $975k has to be added back to income and then depreciated normally over time on the California return. Ouch! So in these states, you still take the full federal Section 179 (because you want the federal benefit), but you have to maintain records to do a separate calculation for state. Typically, your tax software or accountant will track a “Section 179 add-back” on the state return. The disallowed portion isn’t gone; it’s usually allowed as depreciation spread out in future years for the state. It just means no upfront break at the state level beyond that tiny $25k. The rationale for these states is often budgetary — they didn’t want to give up the immediate revenue, so they never adopted the higher federal limits when they increased.

  • States with No Income Tax or No Corporate Tax: A few states, like Nevada, Wyoming, South Dakota (no personal or corporate income tax), or Washington, Texas (no personal, but Texas has a franchise tax), don’t have a conventional income tax that would even use Section 179. In those places, Section 179 is purely a federal matter unless you’re dealing with some alternative business tax. For example, Texas has a franchise tax based on gross margins, which doesn’t follow the federal taxable income directly, so Section 179 doesn’t factor in there. Florida has no personal tax, but does have a corporate income tax and historically Florida did not conform to bonus depreciation and had its own quirks for Section 179 for corporate filers. The key point: if you’re in a no-tax state personally, you just enjoy the federal deduction with no state return needed.

  • Partial Conformity Nuances: Some states conform to some aspects and not others. E.g., a state might accept the federal $1 million+ Section 179, but disallow bonus depreciation. Or vice versa (though more commonly they limit Section 179 and disallow bonus). Pennsylvania, for instance, at one time had a very low cap (like $25k). Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi and a few others have had their own limits historically. These rules do change over time as states update their conformity. Always check the latest for your state or consult a CPA who knows your state’s stance.

  • What It Means for You: If you operate in multiple states, or just in a state with different rules, be prepared for:

    • Additional bookkeeping: You may need to keep a separate depreciation schedule for state taxes. That means tracking what depreciation you would have taken under state rules so you can claim it in subsequent years. It’s a bit of extra work (usually handled via software nowadays).
    • Add-back on state return: Your state tax return might require you to add back the amount of Section 179 that exceeds the state limit. For example, say you’re in New Jersey (state limit $25k) and you expensed $100k federally. On your NJ tax return, you’d add $75k back to income (so you’re taxed on it for NJ), but then you’d be allowed to depreciate that $75k over the assets’ life on future NJ returns.
    • Tax planning complexity: You might consider the state impact when deciding how much Section 179 to take federally. In some cases, if the state difference is significant, a business might choose to not 179 an asset (even if they could) to keep depreciation consistent, especially if the state tax rate is high. However, most often the federal benefit outweighs the state concern, and you just accept the difference. For example, California has a high tax rate, but even so, taking the big federal deduction and then slowly getting the state deduction is usually still better than not taking the federal one.
    • Opportunity for state incentives: Interestingly, some states have their own bonus depreciation or different expensing rules for certain industries. Always worth looking into local state tax incentives that might complement or replace Section 179 for state purposes.

Example – California vs. Federal: Let’s illustrate: You buy $100,000 of equipment in 2024 for your small business. Federal law in 2024 says you can Section 179 up to $1.22M, so you deduct the full $100k on your federal return. California, however, says “we only allow $25k”. So on your CA return, you claim $25k Section 179. The remaining $75k you will depreciate according to CA’s rules (let’s say it’s 5-year property, you might take $15k a year for 5 years, or use CA’s allowed bonus if any, etc.). For 2024, that means your CA taxable income is $75k higher than your federal on that difference (ouch, higher CA tax), but in the next several years, you’ll have CA depreciation deductions even though for federal you’re done — those state deductions will reduce CA income in future years when you have none left federally. It all evens out eventually but in a deferred way. If you weren’t expecting it, you might be surprised by a higher state tax bill in the year of purchase.

Internal Planning: If your business operates in one of the modified states, be extra careful with tax planning. You might, for instance, set aside some of the tax savings from federal to cover the state tax that you’ll still owe because you couldn’t deduct it there. Or consult a tax professional on whether there’s any strategy to mitigate the difference (sometimes using a different business entity, or timing purchases differently to manage state impact).

Stay Updated: State laws can and do change. For example, over the years more states have gradually increased their Section 179 limits (some moved from $25k to higher, or adopted rolling conformity to always match the current IRC). Always check the latest rules each tax year for your state to know what to expect. The IRS rules might be consistent, but state legislatures can surprise you.

Key takeaway: When asking “Who can claim a Section 179 deduction?”, the answer might depend on where you’re asking. Federally, the universe of eligible taxpayers is broad as we covered. At the state level, any business taxpayer can usually claim it, but how much they can claim might differ. This state nuance is often overlooked until filing time.

❓ FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions about Section 179

Q: Can I claim a Section 179 deduction if I don’t have any business income this year?
No. You need positive business income to claim Section 179. It can only reduce taxable business profit to zero, with any excess deduction carried forward to future years.

Q: Does used equipment qualify for Section 179?
Yes. Both new and used equipment qualify for Section 179, as long as you use it over 50% for business and didn’t buy it from a related party.

Q: Are vehicles eligible for Section 179 deductions?
Yes. Business vehicles can qualify, but luxury auto limits apply. Heavy SUVs (over 6,000 lbs) have about a $28,000 Section 179 cap, and regular passenger cars have much lower first-year deduction limits.

Q: Can I take both Section 179 and bonus depreciation on the same asset?
Yes. You typically use Section 179 first (up to its limits) and then take bonus depreciation on the remaining cost. This combination can often write off an entire asset in the first year.

Q: Do all states allow the full Section 179 deduction like the IRS?
No. Some states don’t fully conform to federal rules. Many follow the federal limits, but others (e.g., CA and NJ) impose low Section 179 caps, so your state deduction can be much smaller.

Q: Can a sole proprietor or single-member LLC claim Section 179?
Yes. Any business entity can use Section 179 (sole proprietors and single-member LLCs included). They claim it on the owner’s tax return (Schedule C or equivalent) against their business income.

Q: If I finance or lease equipment, can I still use Section 179?
Yes. Financing an equipment purchase still qualifies for Section 179. You can deduct the full purchase price when it’s placed in service, even if you financed it or pay in installments.

Q: Can Section 179 create a net operating loss for my business?
No. Section 179 by itself can’t create a net operating loss because it’s capped by your business income. Any unused amount is carried forward to use in a future year.

Q: Is Section 179 going away or changing soon?
No. Section 179 is a permanent part of the tax code. The deduction limit adjusts annually for inflation but there is no expiration date set (bonus depreciation is what’s currently phasing out).

Q: Do I have to depreciate an asset if I can use Section 179 on it instead?
No. If you elect Section 179 for an asset, you expense its cost immediately instead of depreciating it over years. You won’t take regular depreciation on that item after taking the Section 179 deduction.