What Really Is a True Trust? – Avoid This Mistake + FAQs
- March 3, 2025
- 7 min read
Confused about what a true trust is? You’re not alone. According to a recent estate planning survey, only 11% of Americans have a trust, leaving most families unprotected and unsure about how trusts really work.
True Trust vs. Myth: Understanding the Real Definition
In everyday language, trust means confidence 🤝. But in law, a trust is a formal legal arrangement with specific parties and duties. A true trust under U.S. law requires a few key elements:
- Settlor (Trustor) – the person who creates the trust and sets its terms.
- Trustee – the person or institution holding the assets and managing them for someone else’s benefit.
- Beneficiary – the person or people who will benefit from the trust assets.
- Trust Property (Corpus) – the assets or property placed into the trust, which the trustee controls for the beneficiaries.
When all these elements come together in a valid trust document (often called a trust deed or trust instrument), you have a true trust.
The settlor transfers ownership of the trust property to the trustee, who must follow the trust’s terms to use those assets for the beneficiaries.
This creates a fiduciary relationship – meaning the trustee has a legal duty to act in the best interest of the beneficiaries at all times ⚖️.
A true trust isn’t just a handshake deal or a verbal promise. It’s usually established through a written document that clearly lays out the rules: who gets what, when, and under what conditions. If a trust is not set up correctly – say, the terms are unclear or assets never actually get transferred into it – the law may decide it isn’t a true trust at all (sometimes calling it a sham trust or simply not recognizing it).
The law only treats an arrangement as a true trust if it meets the formal requirements and the trustee genuinely takes on the duty to manage property for others.
To appreciate how fundamental trusts are, consider their history. The trust concept dates back to medieval England, when knights left for the Crusades and entrusted their land to friends to manage for their families. These early arrangements were the ancestors of modern trusts. Even King Henry VIII tried to curb abuses of these “uses” (old trusts) with the Statute of Uses in 1536, yet the idea proved too useful to disappear.
Trusts evolved and crossed the Atlantic; by the time the United States was founded, trusts were a well-established part of English common law and became embedded in American law.
Federal Rules and State-by-State Twists in Trust Law
Federal Law: Interestingly, there is no single federal “trust law” that tells you how to create a trust. Trusts are creatures of state law – each state has its own rules. However, federal law does step in for certain purposes, especially taxes.
For example, the IRS (Internal Revenue Service) defines types of trusts for federal income tax and estate tax. The IRS doesn’t care about what state your trust is in when it applies these definitions. If your trust is revocable, the IRS treats it as a “grantor trust” (meaning you, the creator, are still the owner of the assets for tax purposes). If it’s irrevocable and you gave up control, the trust might be its own taxpayer (with its own tax ID number).
Federal tax law also distinguishes simple trusts (which must pay out all income annually) from complex trusts (which can accumulate income). In short, on the federal level, trusts are mostly about classification for taxation and ensuring they meet certain definitions (like valid charitable trust rules for tax deductions).
State Law: The heart of trust law lies in the states. Every state (and Washington D.C.) has laws that govern how trusts are formed and operated. Most states have adopted some version of the Uniform Trust Code (UTC) – a standardized set of trust laws intended to harmonize rules across states – but not all states treat trusts exactly the same. This means a “true trust” can have slightly different requirements or effects depending on which state’s law applies.
For instance, the length of time a trust can last varies: Delaware and South Dakota allow dynasty trusts that can continue for generations (they’ve abolished the old Rule Against Perpetuities that limits trust duration), while a state like New York still has stricter limits.
Another example: some states let you create a self-settled asset protection trust, where you can be a beneficiary of a trust you set up for yourself and still shield the assets from creditors. Nevada and Alaska have become popular for these trusts, whereas in many other states, that trick won’t work (your creditors could reach the trust assets).
State laws also differ on things like: default trustee powers and duties, whether a trust needs to register with a court, and how trusts are taxed at the state level.
For example, California taxes trust income if the trustee or a beneficiary is in California, while Delaware imposes no income tax on trusts benefiting out-of-state people. Because of these differences, high-net-worth families often shop around for a friendly state jurisdiction for their trusts. It’s common to see a trust created by someone in one state but intentionally governed by the law of another state known for favorable trust laws (a practice called “trust situs” selection).
The key point is that while the concept of a true trust is consistent – a trustee holding for beneficiaries – the fine print can vary widely from state to state 📍.
Always check which state’s law governs your trust, and remember that federal rules (like taxes) will apply across the board regardless of which state law you use for the trust’s internal affairs. In essence, think of federal law as setting the stage (especially for taxes and big-picture legitimacy), and state law as writing the detailed script for your specific trust.
Anatomy of a True Trust: Key Roles and Concepts
Settlor (Trustor): The Trust-Maker
The settlor (also called trustor or grantor) is the person who dreams up and creates the trust. Without the settlor, there is no trust – they set the stage. This person provides the initial assets (money, property, etc.) and writes the rules (usually via a trust document).
They decide who the trustee and beneficiaries will be, and what the trustee can or cannot do with the assets. In many cases, the settlor is also the initial trustee (especially in a living trust) and even a beneficiary (for example, you might create a revocable trust, name yourself as trustee and also benefit from it during your life).
But the settlor can also be completely separate – like a grandparent setting up a trust for grandkids. The key is that the settlor’s intent is what brings a true trust into being. They have to have a clear intention to create a trust, not just casually hand something over.
Trustee: The Fiduciary in Charge
If the settlor is the visionary, the trustee is the hands-on manager. The trustee holds legal title to the trust assets and must manage them strictly for the benefit of the beneficiaries (not for themselves). Being a trustee is a serious job – the law calls it a fiduciary duty. This means the trustee must be loyal (no self-dealing or making personal profit off the trust beyond allowed fees) and prudent (invest and manage assets with care, like a reasonable person would).
Trustees can be individuals (like a trusted friend or family member) or institutions (like a bank or trust company). Sometimes multiple trustees serve together (co-trustees). A trustee can resign or be replaced, but whoever wears the trustee hat has the same obligations. If a trustee abuses their power or mismanages assets, beneficiaries can take them to court.
Famous case law like Keech v. Sandford established centuries ago that a trustee can’t take advantage of trust property for themselves – and that principle still holds today.
Beneficiaries: The Ones Who Benefit
The beneficiaries are the reason the whole trust exists 😃. They are the people (or sometimes charities or even pets, in special cases) who will ultimately benefit from the trust assets. Beneficiaries can have current rights (current beneficiaries who may be receiving income or use of assets now) or future rights (remainder beneficiaries who will inherit what’s left later).
For example, you might have an income beneficiary (say, your spouse gets income from the trust during their lifetime) and remainder beneficiaries (your children get whatever is left after your spouse passes away). Beneficiaries have the equitable title to the trust property – meaning they have the right to benefit from it, even though the trustee holds the legal title. Importantly, beneficiaries generally have the right to enforce the trust: if the trustee isn’t doing their job, beneficiaries can go to court to compel the trustee or even get a new trustee appointed.
Trust law, both in statutes and cases, ensures beneficiaries’ interests are protected. For instance, courts can remove trustees who breach their duties, and beneficiaries can demand accountings to see how the trust is being managed.
Legal vs. Equitable Title: Who Owns the Trust Assets?
A unique aspect of any true trust is the split between legal title and equitable title. The trustee holds legal title – meaning, on paper and to outside parties, the trustee is the owner of the assets (e.g., a house deed might list “Alice Smith, Trustee of the Smith Family Trust” as the owner). But the beneficiaries hold equitable title – meaning they have the right to benefit from those assets under the trust’s terms. This division is not just academic; it’s what enables trusts to function. Because the trustee has legal title, they can sign contracts, sell or invest property, and otherwise deal with third parties directly.
But because they are bound by equity (the trust law), they must do it for the beneficiaries’ benefit. If a trustee starts treating the assets as their own, courts will step in. This split ownership concept traces back to those old English courts of equity, and it remains the defining feature of a true trust. It’s why, for example, if you sue a trust, you actually sue the trustee (since the trust isn’t a person or corporation). And for tax purposes or liability, whether something is in your “estate” often depends on whether you hold legal title or only beneficial interest. Understanding this dual ownership is key to understanding how trusts operate.
Not All Trusts Are Created Equal: Types of Trusts Explained
Revocable Trusts: Control and Convenience
A revocable trust (often called a living trust) is a trust you can change or cancel (revoke) at any time as long as you’re alive and competent. Think of it as an extension of yourself during life. You, as settlor, typically also serve as the trustee and beneficiary initially, so you keep full control over the assets. Because it’s revocable, you can take assets back out, change who gets what, or even scrap the whole trust. The main reasons people use revocable trusts are for convenience and estate planning:
- Avoiding Probate: When you die, assets in a revocable trust aren’t subject to the public probate court process, so they can pass directly to your heirs according to the trust terms. This saves time, fees, and keeps things private.
- Incapacity Planning: If you become incapacitated, a successor trustee (whom you named) can step in to manage the trust assets for you without needing a court-appointed guardian. Your financial life continues smoothly.
However, a revocable trust is not a tool for asset protection or tax reduction while you’re alive. Since you can revoke it, the law and IRS basically treat the assets as still yours. That means creditors can potentially reach those assets, and there’s no special tax break – the trust’s income is just your income for tax purposes.
Revocable trusts are all about management and transfer, not about shielding wealth from taxes or lawsuits. Still, they are extremely popular because of the probate avoidance benefit. Many famous individuals – from musicians to former presidents – have used revocable living trusts to keep their estate dealings private (for instance, Elvis Presley’s estate plan made use of trusts).
Irrevocable Trusts: Locked-in Protection
As the name suggests, an irrevocable trust is one that, once you create and fund it, you generally cannot change or revoke (at least not easily). You’re effectively handing over the property for good. Why would anyone do that? Because irrevocable trusts can provide benefits that revocable ones cannot:
- Asset Protection: If done properly, assets in an irrevocable trust are no longer considered yours, so your personal creditors typically can’t reach them. For example, wealthy individuals worried about lawsuits might put assets into an irrevocable trust (sometimes offshore or in states like Nevada) to protect them.
- Estate Tax Reduction: Assets in an irrevocable trust can be kept out of your taxable estate. If you have a large estate, placing life insurance or investments into an irrevocable trust (like an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT) or a family gifting trust) can save heirs from hefty estate taxes. The Walton family of Walmart, for example, famously used trusts to transfer wealth and minimize estate taxes.
- Specialized Trusts: Many special-purpose trusts are irrevocable by nature. For example, a charitable remainder trust provides you income now and a charity gets the remainder – once set up, you can’t take it back. A special needs trust to support a disabled person without affecting government benefits is usually irrevocable to ensure the funds are dedicated to the beneficiary.
Irrevocable trusts trade away flexibility for these protections. When you create one, you must appoint a trustee (not you, often) who will have control according to the trust terms.
Modern trust law does sometimes allow tweaks – for instance, some trusts include clauses for a “trust protector” who can change terms if circumstances really change, or you might be able to decant (pour into a new trust) or modify with beneficiary consent under certain state laws. But as a rule, you should consider them permanent. The benefits can be powerful: asset protection trusts shield assets even if you later face lawsuits, and properly structured irrevocable trusts have been key in some of the largest fortunes staying in family hands over generations.
Living (Inter Vivos) vs. Testamentary Trusts
Another way to classify trusts is by when they are created. A living trust (inter vivos trust) is created during the settlor’s lifetime, as we discussed (revocable living trusts and most irrevocable gift trusts are in this category). In contrast, a testamentary trust is created through a will and only comes into existence when the settlor dies. For example, your will might say “I leave my estate to my children in trust until they turn 25.” That instruction in the will creates a testamentary trust upon your death, and the appointed trustee (overseen by the probate court) will manage those assets for the kids.
Testamentary trusts are always irrevocable (since the person who set it up is now deceased and can’t change it). They are subject to probate (since the will goes through probate), and often ongoing court supervision, which can be more cumbersome. Still, they are useful for scenarios like ensuring minor children or dependents are provided for under structured terms if you pass away unexpectedly. Many parents with young kids use a will that sets up a testamentary trust as a safety net.
Grantor vs. Non-Grantor Trusts (Tax Perspective)
These terms deal with who pays the income tax on trust earnings. A grantor trust for tax means the person who set up the trust (the grantor) is still treated by the IRS as the owner of the trust’s assets. All revocable trusts are grantor trusts by definition – since you can control or revoke it, you’re the owner in the IRS’s eyes.
Some irrevocable trusts are also deliberately set up to be grantor trusts – for example, you give away assets but keep the power to substitute assets or the right to income, causing the trust to be “grantor.” Why do that? It can be a strategy so that the trust assets grow without being reduced by taxes (since you pay the tax from your own pocket, effectively adding to the trust’s value for the beneficiaries). This is sometimes called an intentionally defective grantor trust strategy by estate planners.
A non-grantor trust, on the other hand, is a separate taxpayer. The trust pays its own taxes on income (or passes them to beneficiaries if distributed). Once you relinquish all those control strings that made it a grantor trust, it becomes its own entity for tax.
Non-grantor trusts can still get some tax advantages – for instance, if the trust is established in a state with no income tax, and it’s non-grantor, then the trust’s investment income can avoid state tax that the grantor might have paid. However, note that trusts pay higher federal income tax rates on much lower amounts of income than individuals – the tax brackets for trusts are compressed. So often, trustees of non-grantor trusts will try to distribute income out to beneficiaries (who might be in lower brackets) rather than let the trust accumulate a lot and pay high taxes.
Specialty Trusts: Charitable, Spendthrift, and More
Beyond the basic categories above, there are many specialized trusts each with unique purposes:
- Charitable Trusts: These trusts have a charity as one of the beneficiaries. Two common types are Charitable Remainder Trusts (CRT), where you (or someone) get income for a period and a charity gets what’s left at the end, and Charitable Lead Trusts (CLT), where a charity gets income first for some years and your family gets the remainder later. They provide charitable giving and potential tax deductions or estate tax breaks.
- Spendthrift Trusts: This isn’t a separate kind of trust, but a feature you can add to any trust. A spendthrift clause prevents a beneficiary from selling or borrowing against their future interest in the trust, and stops creditors from seizing that interest before the beneficiary actually receives distributions. Essentially, it protects imprudent beneficiaries from themselves (and from greedy creditors). Spendthrift provisions are recognized in most states (thanks to an old American case, Nichols v. Eaton, which in 1875 upheld the validity of such protections).
- Special Needs Trusts (SNT): This is a trust designed to provide for a disabled beneficiary without disqualifying them from needs-based government benefits (like Medicaid or SSI). The trust can pay for supplemental needs (things government benefits don’t cover) while the beneficiary still qualifies for aid. SNTs have very specific rules to be valid, and are often irrevocable. They’re a lifeline for families with disabled children or adults, ensuring care without sacrificing benefits.
- Constructive/Resulting Trusts: These aren’t planned estate-planning tools but remedies imposed by courts. For instance, if someone fraudulently took your property, a court might declare they hold it in a “constructive trust” for you (meaning they must give it back to the rightful owner). It’s called a trust, but it’s basically the court forcing someone to do the right thing. This is different from a true trust, which is intentionally set up by a settlor.
Even within these categories, there are countless variations and niche trusts (like gun trusts for firearms, pet trusts for animals, or land trusts for holding real estate anonymously). The important thing is: whatever the name or type, if it has the core elements of a trust and follows legal formalities, it falls under the umbrella of a true trust.
True Trusts in Action: 3 Real-World Scenarios
🏠 Scenario 1: A Family Living Trust to Avoid Probate
Situation: John and Jane Doe are a married couple in California with two children. They own a home, some savings, and life insurance. They’ve heard horror stories about lengthy probate and want to keep things simple if one of them passes away. They also worry what happens if one is incapacitated.
Solution: They set up a joint revocable living trust and transfer their home and investment accounts into it. John and Jane are co-trustees, managing everything as before. If one of them becomes incapacitated or dies, the other automatically continues as sole trustee with full access to the assets. When both have passed, a successor trustee (John’s brother, whom they named) will distribute the remaining assets to their children according to the trust instructions, without any probate court involvement.
Aspect | Details |
---|---|
Trust Type | Revocable Living Trust (joint for a married couple) |
Settlors | John and Jane Doe (they created the trust and contributed assets) |
Trustees | John and Jane as initial co-trustees; John’s brother as successor trustee upon their death/incapacity |
Beneficiaries | John and Jane during their lifetimes; after both pass, their two children |
Purpose | Avoid probate and ensure seamless management if one spouse dies or is incapacitated 😌 |
Key Features | Fully revocable/amendable; uses California state law; funded with home, bank accounts, life insurance beneficiary is the trust; no separate tax filing needed while John/Jane alive (grantor trust) |
Outcome | When John and Jane die, their kids receive the trust assets directly as outlined (e.g., split 50/50 at youngest age 25) without going through probate. No court delays, and the family’s financial affairs stay private. |
💼 Scenario 2: An Irrevocable Trust for Wealth Protection
Situation: Sarah is a successful entrepreneur with an estate valued around $10 million, including a $5 million life insurance policy. She’s concerned about estate taxes (which could take 40% of anything over the exemption) and also wants to protect some assets from potential future lawsuits or creditors.
Solution: She establishes an irrevocable trust (in this case, an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust, or ILIT). She transfers ownership of her life insurance policy to the ILIT and names the trust as the beneficiary of the policy. She also gradually gifts a portfolio of stocks into the trust (using her annual gift tax exclusions to avoid gift taxes). Sarah appoints a trusted colleague as the trustee, with her two adult children as the beneficiaries of the trust.
Aspect | Details |
---|---|
Trust Type | Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT) – a type of irrevocable trust specifically for life insurance |
Settlor | Sarah (she creates and funds the trust with her life insurance policy and some investments) |
Trustee | Sarah’s colleague (manages the insurance policy and any trust investments, per the trust’s terms) |
Beneficiaries | Sarah’s two children (they will receive the trust assets upon Sarah’s death, or as specified) |
Purpose | Remove assets from Sarah’s estate to save on estate taxes, and safeguard those assets from any personal lawsuits or creditors 🛡️ |
Key Features | Irrevocable (Sarah cannot reclaim the assets); trust owns the life insurance (so the $5M payout bypasses her taxable estate); may be set up as a grantor trust for income tax (Sarah pays any tax on trust investment income, further reducing her estate). Includes a spendthrift clause to protect the assets for the kids. |
Outcome | When Sarah passes away, the life insurance pays $5M into the trust, which is not counted in her estate – potentially saving her family over $2M in estate taxes. The trustee then manages and distributes the funds to Sarah’s children as the trust directs (for example, paying for college, then giving the remainder at certain ages), all without probate. The trust’s assets are also shielded from any claims by Sarah’s creditors or lawsuits that might have arisen after the transfer. |
♿ Scenario 3: A Special Needs Trust for a Disabled Child
Situation: Mark and Linda have a 10-year-old son, Alex, with severe autism. Alex will likely need support for his entire life, including medical care and assistance with daily living. Mark and Linda are worried about what happens when they’re gone – they want to leave money for Alex’s care, but if they just leave it outright, he could lose eligibility for Medicaid and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits.
Solution: They create a Special Needs Trust (SNT) for Alex’s benefit. In their will (and life insurance policies), they direct that any inheritance for Alex goes into this trust, rather than to him directly. They also put some savings into the trust now. They appoint Linda’s sister as the trustee, with instructions that the trust is to be used only to supplement (not replace) government benefits – paying for things like therapies, a specialized wheelchair van, education, and quality-of-life extras for Alex.
Aspect | Details |
---|---|
Trust Type | Special Needs Trust (Third-Party SNT funded by parents’ assets) |
Settlors | Mark and Linda (they establish the trust and will fund it via their estate and insurance) |
Trustee | Linda’s sister (named to manage the trust assets for Alex’s benefit) |
Beneficiary | Alex (the disabled son) is the sole beneficiary during his lifetime; after his death, any remaining funds will go to Alex’s siblings or a charity per the trust terms |
Purpose | Provide for Alex’s supplemental needs throughout his life without disqualifying him from Medicaid/SSI benefits ❤️ |
Key Features | Irrevocable; contains strict language that distributions are purely discretionary (Alex can’t demand money) and only for supplemental needs not covered by public benefits; includes a spendthrift clause to prevent any creditors from accessing funds; since it’s funded by parents (not Alex’s own money), any leftover funds can go to others (no Medicaid payback requirement) |
Outcome | When Mark and Linda pass, the life insurance payout and estate funds flow into the SNT for Alex. The trustee invests and uses those funds to give Alex a comfortable life – paying for caregivers, medical treatments, recreational activities, etc., without jeopardizing his Medicaid or SSI. The process involves no probate delays for Alex’s inheritance. Throughout Alex’s life, the trust ensures he has extra support. After Alex’s eventual passing, any remaining trust assets are distributed to his siblings as a legacy. |
Beware the Pitfalls: Avoid These Common Trust Mistakes ⚠️
Even with the best intentions, it’s easy to slip up when creating or managing a trust. Here are some frequent mistakes and misconceptions to steer clear of:
- ❌ Not Funding the Trust: A trust only controls assets that are put into it. People often sign a beautiful trust document but then fail to retitle their accounts or property into the trust’s name. The result? At death, those assets still have to go through probate or end up distributed by default rules, undermining the whole point of the trust. Always double-check that your house deed, bank accounts, investment accounts – any asset meant for the trust – are properly titled in the trustee’s name or have the trust named as beneficiary (for things like life insurance or retirement accounts, if appropriate).
- ❌ Choosing the Wrong Trustee: The best-written trust can fail if the trustee is careless, dishonest, or overwhelmed. Picking Uncle Bob just because he’s family might backfire if Bob isn’t responsible or savvy with finances. A trustee should be trustworthy (of course), organized, and ideally financially knowledgeable. In some cases, it might be worth hiring a professional trustee or trust company. And always name successor trustees in case your first choice can’t serve.
- ❌ One-Size-Fits-All Documents: Using a generic form or, worse, a shady “trust kit” sold by unscrupulous promoters can lead to an invalid or ineffective trust. Avoid so-called “pure trust” or “constitutional trust” schemes that promise you’ll pay zero taxes or magically hide assets from all creditors without any change in control. If it sounds too good to be true, it likely is. The IRS actively targets abusive trust arrangements that are basically shams. A true trust needs substance – real transfer of assets and genuine duties for trustees. Stick to legitimate estate planning, and consult an attorney for anything complex.
- ❌ Neglecting to Update: Life changes and laws change. If you set up a trust and then forget about it, you might run into problems later. Births, deaths, divorces, or major asset changes might necessitate updating the trust or writing a new one. Similarly, laws around estate tax or trust rules can change (for instance, the estate tax exemption might drop in the future, making planning more urgent). Review your trust every few years or after major life events to ensure it still accomplishes your goals.
- ❌ Unrealistic Expectations: Finally, avoid misunderstanding what your trust does. A revocable living trust won’t protect your assets from nursing home costs or lawsuits – because you still own them during your life. An irrevocable trust might protect assets, but only the ones you actually put in and relinquish control over (and doing that has trade-offs). Be clear on what type of trust you have and what it can (and can’t) do. If you’re not sure, ask an expert – many an heir has been surprised to find out that Mom’s trust didn’t avoid estate taxes, for example, because it wasn’t designed to.
🔑 The Bottom Line: True Trusts Are Powerful Tools with Proper Planning
True trusts are among the most powerful tools in the legal and financial world for protecting assets, managing wealth, and caring for loved ones. They allow you to dictate what happens to your property in a way that simply handing it over or writing a basic will cannot achieve. But, as we’ve seen, with that power comes complexity. The concept of a “true trust” means meeting legal standards and thoughtfully balancing control with protection. When done correctly, a trust can safeguard your family’s future, preserve your legacy, and even achieve philanthropic goals long after you’re gone.
However, a trust is not a set-it-and-forget-it magic box. It requires careful planning, proper management, and periodic check-ups. Always ensure your trust aligns with current laws and your life situation. And don’t hesitate to get professional guidance – even the experts consult fellow experts when navigating tricky trust issues. In the end, understanding what a true trust is and how it works puts you a step ahead in securing peace of mind and prosperity for you and your beneficiaries. 💙
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: What’s the difference between a will and a trust?
A: A will takes effect at death and usually goes through probate. A trust takes effect immediately, avoids probate, and can manage assets during your life (especially if you become incapacitated).
Q: How is a revocable trust different from an irrevocable trust?
A: A revocable trust can be changed or canceled by the settlor at any time, offering flexibility but no asset protection. An irrevocable trust generally cannot be changed, but it provides asset protection and tax benefits.
Q: Do I need a lawyer to set up a trust?
A: It’s wise. While you can technically draft a trust yourself, trusts are complex. A qualified attorney can ensure your trust is valid, meets legal requirements, and truly accomplishes your goals.
Q: Does a living trust protect my assets from creditors or nursing homes?
A: No, not if it’s revocable. Assets in a revocable living trust are still yours, so creditors or long-term care costs can reach them. Only certain irrevocable trusts may offer asset protection if set up properly.
Q: Who pays the taxes on trust income?
A: If it’s a revocable or grantor trust, the settlor pays taxes on trust income. If it’s a non-grantor trust, the trust itself (or the beneficiaries if income is distributed) pays the taxes.
Q: Are trusts only for the wealthy?
A: While trusts are crucial for high-net-worth estates, even middle-class families use them to avoid probate, provide for minor children or special needs relatives. It depends on your goals, not just wealth.
Q: Can I be the trustee of my own trust?
A: Yes, for a revocable living trust, you typically are your own trustee initially. However, for an irrevocable trust designed to protect assets, you usually appoint someone else to be trustee for it to be effective.
Q: Are trusts public or private documents?
A: Most trusts are private. A living trust isn’t filed with a court, so its details remain confidential. By contrast, a will (and any trust in it) becomes part of the public record.