How to Fill Out DOJ Form EOIR-26 (w/Examples) + FAQs

You file Form EOIR-26 to appeal an Immigration Judge’s decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals within 30 calendar days of the ruling. Miss that window, and the order becomes final, ICE can deport you, and your right to review under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.38 is gone.

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) rejects thousands of EOIR-26 filings every year for technical defects, late mailing, missing signatures, or unpaid fees. According to EOIR’s FY 2024 Statistics Yearbook, the BIA received over 31,000 case appeals in a single fiscal year, and roughly one in six were summarily dismissed before the merits were ever read.

Here is what you will learn in this guide:

  • 📝 How to complete every box, line, and signature block on Form EOIR-26 without triggering an automatic dismissal
  • ⏰ How the 30-day jurisdictional deadline works under Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386 (1995) and why no extension exists
  • 💵 How to pay the new $975 filing fee or request a fee waiver using Form EOIR-26A
  • 💻 How to file electronically through EOIR’s ECAS portal versus paper filing in Falls Church
  • ⚖️ How to write a “Reasons for Appeal” statement strong enough to survive Matter of Valencia, 19 I&N Dec. 354 (BIA 1986)

What Form EOIR-26 Is and Why It Exists

Form EOIR-26 is the Notice of Appeal from a Decision of an Immigration Judge, the single document that transfers jurisdiction from the immigration court to the Board of Immigration Appeals. The Department of Justice created it under authority granted by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(b) so non-citizens, DHS attorneys, and accredited representatives have a uniform way to challenge merits decisions in removal, deportation, exclusion, rescission, and certain bond-related rulings.

The form exists because immigration court decisions are not automatically appealable. You must affirmatively reserve appeal at the hearing, then perfect the appeal by filing a complete EOIR-26 with the BIA. If you fail to file, the IJ’s order becomes administratively final under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.39, and ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations can issue a bag-and-baggage letter within days.

The plain-English purpose of EOIR-26 is to put the BIA on notice that you disagree, identify exactly which parts of the decision you challenge, and start the briefing schedule. The consequence of leaving the form vague is severe. Under Matter of Valencia, the BIA can summarily dismiss appeals where the reasons are not “meaningfully” stated.

For example, Maria, a Salvadoran asylum-seeker, lost her merits hearing in San Francisco. She filed EOIR-26 writing only “the judge was wrong.” The BIA dismissed her appeal without briefing because the statement failed the 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3(b) specificity requirement.

A common misconception is that filing EOIR-26 freezes deportation forever. It does not. It triggers an automatic stay of removal only while the appeal is pending under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.6(a), and that stay evaporates the moment the BIA rules.

EOIR-26 vs. Other EOIR Appeal Forms

People confuse EOIR-26 with Form EOIR-29 (appeals from USCIS decisions) and Form EOIR-42B (cancellation of removal applications). Using the wrong form means the BIA never receives jurisdiction, and your appeal vanishes.

EOIR-26 is only for IJ decisions. Bond appeals also use EOIR-26, but the rules differ: under Matter of Joseph, bond appeals do not get an automatic stay of the bond order. EOIR-26B, by contrast, is reserved for DHS bond appeals.

The consequence of grabbing the wrong form is that the 30-day clock keeps running. Filing EOIR-29 against an IJ decision will not toll your deadline, and by the time you discover the error, your removal order is final.

Form Purpose Filed With
EOIR-26 Appeal IJ decision BIA
EOIR-26A Fee waiver request BIA, with EOIR-26
EOIR-29 Appeal USCIS denial BIA via local USCIS office
EOIR-33 Change of address Court or BIA
EOIR-42B Cancellation application Immigration Court

The 30-Day Jurisdictional Deadline

The deadline to file Form EOIR-26 is 30 calendar days from the date the Immigration Judge issued the decision, per 8 C.F.R. § 1003.38(b). The BIA must receive the form within that window, not just see it postmarked. The Supreme Court confirmed in Stone v. INS that this deadline is jurisdictional and cannot be equitably tolled by the Board.

If the 30th day falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or federal holiday, the deadline rolls to the next business day under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(b). Beyond that single courtesy, no extensions exist. Hospitalization, attorney malpractice, or postal delay do not save you.

The BIA reaffirmed this rigidity in Matter of Liadov, 23 I&N Dec. 990 (BIA 2006), holding that even FedEx delivery failures do not excuse a late filing. The Board reasoned that respondents control mailing decisions, so the risk of carrier error rests with them.

For example, Diego, a lawful permanent resident in Houston, received an oral removal decision on March 1. He mailed EOIR-26 on March 28 by USPS Priority Mail. It arrived April 2, three days late. The BIA dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

A common misconception is that filing a motion to reopen with the IJ pauses the appeal clock. It does not. Under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1)(v), filing a motion to reopen with the IJ while the BIA appeal window runs is independent and cannot extend the EOIR-26 deadline.

Counting the Days Correctly

Day 1 is the day after the IJ’s decision. If the judge ruled on May 1, day 1 is May 2, and day 30 is May 31. The BIA Practice Manual Chapter 3.1(b) explains the counting rule in detail.

Written decisions and oral decisions trigger the clock differently. For oral decisions, the clock starts the day after the hearing. For written decisions, the clock starts the day after service, which the IJ records on the decision itself.

The consequence of miscounting is total loss of the appeal. Aisha, a Somali asylum-seeker in Arlington, counted from the day she received the written order in the mail rather than the date stamped on the decision. She filed two days late. Her removal order became final, and ICE arrested her at her work site within a week.

Step-By-Step: Filling Out Every Line of Form EOIR-26

The 2024 revision of EOIR-26 contains nine numbered items on page one, a “Reasons for Appeal” narrative on page two, signature and Proof of Service blocks, and a separate transcript-request box. Skipping any required field is grounds for summary dismissal under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(2)(i)(A). The current version is downloadable from the EOIR forms list.

Use blue or black ink, type the form when possible, and never write outside the boxes. The BIA scans every filing into the Electronic Case Access System (ECAS), and handwriting that bleeds outside the field can be cropped, leaving fields appearing blank.

Always file an original signed form and keep a copy. The copy proves what you filed if the BIA loses the original. Mail the form to the Clerk’s Office, Board of Immigration Appeals, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2000, Falls Church, VA 22041.

Item 1: Respondent/Applicant Name

Enter the exact name that appears on your charging document, typically the Notice to Appear (Form I-862). Use last name, first name, middle name. If the NTA misspells your name, use that spelling here and submit a separate motion to correct.

The consequence of using a different name is mismatched records. The BIA cannot link your appeal to your A-file, and the case sits in limbo while clerks chase the paperwork.

For example, Wei Chen, whose NTA listed him as “Chen, Wei,” wrote “Chen Wei” without the comma. His appeal sat unprocessed for 11 weeks until counsel called the clerk’s office.

Item 2: Alien Registration Number (A-Number)

Write your nine-digit A-number preceded by “A,” with no dashes. If you have multiple A-numbers from prior encounters, list the primary number on the NTA and attach a cover letter listing the others.

A wrong A-number means the BIA cannot retrieve your record of proceedings from the IJ. The consequence is automatic delay and possible dismissal for failure to perfect.

Item 3: Date of Birth and Item 4: Country of Citizenship

Use MM/DD/YYYY format for the date of birth. For citizenship, name the country exactly as listed on your passport or NTA. If you are stateless, write “Stateless” and explain in the Reasons for Appeal.

Misstating citizenship can affect later relief eligibility. The BIA may flag inconsistencies between EOIR-26 and the I-589 asylum application, weakening credibility under Matter of A-S-, 21 I&N Dec. 1106 (BIA 1998).

Item 5: Type of Proceeding Appealed

Check the box matching the proceeding type: removal, deportation, exclusion, rescission, bond, or “other.” Most post-1997 cases are removal proceedings under INA § 240.

Checking the wrong box can route the appeal to the wrong panel. Bond appeals follow accelerated briefing under the BIA Practice Manual Chapter 7, so misclassification slows everything.

Item 6: Location of Immigration Court and Item 7: Date of Decision

Write the city and state of the immigration court (e.g., “Adelanto, California”). The decision date must match the date stamped on the IJ’s written or oral order verbatim.

If you write a different date, the BIA may calculate your deadline incorrectly and dismiss the appeal as untimely even when it was actually on time. Always pull the date from the order itself.

Item 8: Are You Currently Detained?

Check Yes or No and, if yes, list the detention facility’s full name and address. This box determines whether your case is placed on the detained docket, which has faster briefing.

For example, Pedro, held at the Stewart Detention Center in Lumpkin, Georgia, checked “No” because he expected to bond out. He stayed detained, briefing followed the non-detained schedule, and his appeal sat for 14 extra months.

Item 9: Do You Want Oral Argument?

Oral argument before the BIA is rare and granted only on Board motion under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(e)(7). Checking yes signals interest but is almost never decisive. Most cases are decided on the briefs by single-member panels.

Page 2: Reasons for Appeal

This is the most important field on the form. Write specific, fact-based, law-based reasons. Identify each error, the law it violated, and the evidence in the record supporting your position.

Vague statements like “the judge erred” trigger summary dismissal under Matter of Valencia and Matter of Holguin, 13 I&N Dec. 423 (BIA 1969). Specificity is the rule, not the exception.

A strong example reads: “The IJ erred in finding the respondent not credible because the IJ relied on a perceived inconsistency about the date of the 2019 attack that the respondent explained on cross-examination at Tr. 47-49, contrary to Matter of A-B-, 27 I&N Dec. 316 (A.G. 2018) and the Ninth Circuit’s holding in Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2010).”

Briefing Statement

Indicate whether you will file a separate written brief. Check Yes if you want to submit a full legal brief, which is highly recommended. Failure to file a promised brief is independent grounds for summary dismissal under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(2)(i)(E).

The BIA issues a briefing schedule after receiving your transcript. You then have 21 days (detained) or 21 days extendable to 21 more (non-detained) to brief the case.

Transcript Request

Check the transcript box if your appeal challenges factual findings. Without a transcript, the BIA reviews the IJ’s written or summary order only, which usually favors the government. Transcripts are produced by contract court reporters.

Signature Block

Sign in ink. The signature must be the respondent’s or counsel’s, not a relative’s. Forged or proxy signatures void the filing under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3(c).

If counsel signs, counsel must also file Form EOIR-27, the Notice of Entry of Appearance, simultaneously. Without EOIR-27, the BIA refuses to communicate with the attorney.

Proof of Service

You must serve a copy on the DHS Office of the Chief Counsel at the trial-level immigration court. List the date, method (mail, hand-delivery, or eService), and full address. Without proof of service, the BIA dismisses under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3(a)(2).

Filing the Form: Paper Versus ECAS

You can file Form EOIR-26 on paper to Falls Church or electronically through EOIR’s ECAS Respondent Access portal. Attorneys with EOIR ID accounts must file electronically when ECAS is available for the case. Pro se respondents may file electronically once they register a Respondent Access account.

Paper filing requires the original plus the filing fee or fee-waiver request, mailed or hand-delivered to the BIA Clerk’s Office. Using FedEx or UPS is allowed, but as Matter of Liadov shows, you bear the risk of carrier delay. ECAS filing timestamps automatically and eliminates mailing risk.

The consequence of choosing paper when ECAS is mandatory is rejection. The BIA returns the paper filing unfiled, and the deadline keeps running. Always confirm whether your case is ECAS-eligible by checking the EOIR automated case status hotline at 1-800-898-7180.

For example, Fatou, represented by counsel in New York, mailed EOIR-26 to Falls Church on day 28. Her case was ECAS-mandatory, and the BIA rejected the paper filing on day 33. Her appeal was lost.

A common misconception is that ECAS uploads count when “submitted.” The actual rule is that ECAS filings are timely when successfully transmitted before midnight Eastern Time on the deadline. A failed upload at 11:59 PM is untimely.

The Filing Fee and Form EOIR-26A

The current filing fee under the 2024 EOIR Final Fee Rule, 89 Fed. Reg. 1364 is $975. The fee was raised from $110 to reflect the cost of adjudicating appeals. Pay by check or money order made payable to “United States Department of Justice,” or by credit card through Pay.gov.

If you cannot afford the fee, file Form EOIR-26A with the EOIR-26. The waiver requires you to declare under penalty of perjury that paying would cause financial hardship. Approval is discretionary, but indigence is the standard.

The consequence of unpaid fees and no waiver is rejection. The BIA returns the EOIR-26 stamped “fee deficient,” and the deadline does not pause. Jamal, a delivery driver in Newark, mailed EOIR-26 with a $110 check from a printout of the old form. The BIA rejected the filing on day 32, after his deadline.

Three Common Scenarios and Their Outcomes

The three most common EOIR-26 fact patterns are asylum denial appeals, in-absentia order appeals, and bond appeals. Each carries distinct risks under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.

Scenario 1: Asylum Denial Appeal

Filing Step Resulting Outcome
File EOIR-26 within 30 days, request transcript, brief Automatic stay of removal under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.6
Skip transcript request Factual review limited; BIA defers to IJ
Vague Reasons for Appeal Summary dismissal under Matter of Valencia

Scenario 2: In-Absentia Removal Order Appeal

Filing Step Resulting Outcome
File motion to reopen with IJ first under INA § 240(b)(5)(C) Preserves better record for BIA review
File EOIR-26 directly BIA reviews only legal sufficiency of in-absentia order
Argue lack of notice with proof Possible reversal under Matter of M-R-A-, 24 I&N Dec. 665 (BIA 2008)

Scenario 3: Bond Redetermination Appeal

Filing Step Resulting Outcome
File EOIR-26 marking “Bond” in Item 5 Expedited briefing on detained docket
Request transcript BIA reviews bond hearing record
Fail to serve DHS Summary dismissal under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3

Three Named-Person Examples

Carlos, a Honduran asylum-seeker held at the Otay Mesa Detention Center, lost his hearing on June 5. He filed EOIR-26 on June 20 through ECAS, paid the $975 fee online, and wrote a Reasons for Appeal citing Matter of A-R-C-G-, 26 I&N Dec. 388 (BIA 2014). The BIA accepted the appeal, ordered a transcript, and set a 21-day briefing schedule.

Linh, a Vietnamese lawful permanent resident in Boston, was ordered removed on aggravated felony grounds. She filed EOIR-26 on day 29, requested a transcript, and challenged the IJ’s categorical-approach analysis under Mathis v. United States, 579 U.S. 500 (2016). Her appeal succeeded on remand.

Samuel, a Nigerian student in Dallas, missed his hearing because the court mailed the notice to an old address. He filed a motion to reopen with the IJ and, in parallel, EOIR-26 to preserve the appeal track. The BIA stayed the appeal pending the IJ’s ruling on reopening, then remanded under Matter of M-S-, 22 I&N Dec. 349 (BIA 1998).

Mistakes to Avoid

These are the most common errors that doom EOIR-26 appeals. Each carries a specific consequence under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(2) or related rules.

  1. Missing the 30-day deadline. The BIA loses jurisdiction, and the removal order becomes final.
  2. Writing vague Reasons for Appeal. Triggers summary dismissal under Matter of Valencia.
  3. Forgetting Proof of Service on DHS. Dismissal under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3(a)(2).
  4. Sending the wrong fee amount. The fee jumped to $975 in 2024, and underpayment voids the filing.
  5. Skipping Form EOIR-27 when counsel files. The BIA refuses to recognize the attorney.
  6. Using paper when ECAS is mandatory. Rejected, often after the deadline expires.
  7. Promising a brief, then not filing one. Independent ground for summary dismissal.
  8. Failing to update address with Form EOIR-33/BIA. BIA decisions go to the wrong place, and you miss the next deadline.
  9. Listing the wrong A-number. Records mismatch and the appeal stalls indefinitely.
  10. Not requesting a transcript when factual findings are at issue. The BIA defers to the IJ’s view.

Do’s and Don’ts

Follow these to keep your appeal alive and on the merits.

  • Do file at least 7 days before the deadline to absorb mailing or upload errors.
  • Do keep stamped copies of every page for your own records and any later federal court petition under INA § 242.
  • Do cite specific transcript pages and exhibits in the Reasons for Appeal to satisfy Matter of Valencia.
  • Do file Form EOIR-27 if represented, because the BIA will not communicate with unrepresented counsel.
  • Do check the BIA Practice Manual for current local rules before each filing.
  • Don’t rely on the postmark; the BIA must receive the filing in time.
  • Don’t write “see attached brief” instead of real reasons; the BIA dismisses for lack of specificity.
  • Don’t forget the signature; an unsigned EOIR-26 is treated as not filed.
  • Don’t mail to the immigration court that issued the decision; it must go to the BIA in Falls Church.
  • Don’t assume a fee waiver is automatic; submit EOIR-26A with full financial disclosure.

Pros and Cons of Filing EOIR-26

Filing an appeal has real benefits and real costs. Weigh them before you commit.

  • Pro: Triggers an automatic stay of removal under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.6.
  • Pro: Preserves your right to circuit court review under INA § 242(a), which is otherwise waived.
  • Pro: Allows you to correct legal errors and develop a fuller record.
  • Pro: Buys time to gather new evidence for a separate motion to reopen.
  • Pro: Can result in remand for a new hearing before a different IJ.
  • Con: The $975 fee plus attorney costs are substantial.
  • Con: Time spent in detention may grow during BIA review, which averages over 12 months per the EOIR Adjudication Statistics.
  • Con: A frivolous appeal can lead to attorney sanctions under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.102.
  • Con: Voluntary departure granted by the IJ is forfeited if you appeal and lose, per Dada v. Mukasey, 554 U.S. 1 (2008).
  • Con: The BIA can affirm without opinion under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(e)(4), giving you no reasoning to attack on petition for review.

Key Entities Involved

The Board of Immigration Appeals is the highest administrative body for interpreting U.S. immigration law, sitting in Falls Church, Virginia. It has roughly 28 appellate immigration judges who decide cases in three-member panels or as single members.

The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), a component of the DOJ, houses both the BIA and the immigration courts. Its Office of the Chief Immigration Judge supervises trial-level adjudication.

The DHS Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA), through local Offices of the Chief Counsel, represents ICE in proceedings. OPLA receives your Proof of Service copy and files DHS’s responsive brief.

Federal courts of appeals review final BIA orders on petition under INA § 242, with strict 30-day filing deadlines of their own. Without a timely EOIR-26, you have no path to a circuit court.

State and Court-Specific Nuances

EOIR-26 is a federal form, but practical filing differs by court. Detained dockets at Stewart, Adelanto, and Otay Mesa follow accelerated briefing under the BIA Practice Manual Chapter 4.6.

Non-detained dockets in New York, Los Angeles, and Houston experience the longest average delays per the TRAC Immigration data. Filing through ECAS is mandatory for represented respondents in most non-detained courts.

The Falls Church BIA Clerk’s Office accepts paper filings until 4:00 PM ET. Late drop-offs are stamped the next business day, which can blow the deadline. The BIA Practice Manual Chapter 3.1(c) sets out these mechanics.

Recap of Key Rulings

Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386 (1995) held that the BIA appeal deadline is jurisdictional. Equitable tolling by the Board is forbidden, although federal circuits have allowed it for petitions for review.

Matter of Liadov, 23 I&N Dec. 990 (BIA 2006) confirmed that courier delivery failure does not excuse late filings. Respondents own the risk of carrier choice.

Matter of Valencia, 19 I&N Dec. 354 (BIA 1986) requires meaningful specificity in the Reasons for Appeal. Conclusory statements draw summary dismissal.

Dada v. Mukasey, 554 U.S. 1 (2008) preserved the right to withdraw a voluntary departure request when filing an appeal, but only if you act before the voluntary departure period ends.

FAQs

Can I file Form EOIR-26 after 30 days if I have a good reason?

No. The 30-day deadline is jurisdictional under Stone v. INS. The BIA cannot accept a late filing for any reason, including hospitalization, attorney error, or postal delays.

Does filing EOIR-26 stop my deportation?

Yes. A timely-filed EOIR-26 triggers an automatic stay of removal under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.6(a) for the duration of the BIA appeal, unless the IJ ordered expedited removal proceedings.

Is there a fee waiver available for the $975 filing fee?

Yes. File Form EOIR-26A with the EOIR-26, declare your financial hardship under penalty of perjury, and the BIA decides at its discretion based on indigence.

Can I file EOIR-26 electronically?

Yes. Attorneys must use ECAS where available, and pro se respondents may register for Respondent Access to file online. Electronic filing eliminates mail risk under Matter of Liadov.

Do I need an attorney to file EOIR-26?

No. You can file pro se. However, the BIA pro se dismissal rate is materially higher, and counsel dramatically improves your chances of merits review and remand.

Can DHS appeal an IJ decision using EOIR-26?

Yes. DHS attorneys file EOIR-26 to challenge IJ rulings that grant relief, subject to the same 30-day deadline under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.38.

Will the BIA hold oral argument on my appeal?

No. Oral argument is granted only on the Board’s own motion under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(e)(7) and is rare. Most appeals are decided on the briefs by single members.

Does filing EOIR-26 forfeit my voluntary departure?

Yes. Under Dada v. Mukasey, filing an appeal generally forfeits voluntary departure unless you withdraw the VD request before the period ends in writing to the BIA.

Can I add new evidence to my appeal?

No. The BIA reviews the existing record only under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(3). New evidence requires a separate motion to reopen filed with the immigration court or BIA.

Will I lose my appeal if I move during the case?

Yes, if you do not update your address. File Form EOIR-33/BIA within five working days of moving, or BIA decisions go to the old address and you miss the next deadline.

Can I file EOIR-26 to appeal a bond decision?

Yes. Bond appeals use EOIR-26 with “Bond” checked in Item 5, but bond appeals do not get an automatic stay of the bond order under Matter of Joseph.

Does filing EOIR-26 preserve my right to federal court review?

Yes. A timely BIA appeal is a prerequisite to a circuit court petition for review under INA § 242(d)(1). Skipping the BIA waives federal court jurisdiction.